Advertisement
Writers Wanted
Front, Kernel, Security, Distributions, Development.
See your byline here on LWN.net.
Advertise here
Not logged in
Log in now
Create an account
Subscribe to LWN
Recent Features
LWN.net Weekly Edition for September 7, 2012
LinuxCon: funding development
Improving Ubuntu's application upload process
LWN.net Weekly Edition for August 30, 2012
Look and feel lawsuits, the second time around
Printable page
|
Weekly edition |
Kernel |
Security |
Distributions |
Contact Us |
Search |
Archives |
Calendar |
Subscribe |
Write for LWN |
LWN.net FAQ |
Sponsors |
| |
|
Users and maintainers
Users and maintainers
Posted Nov 19, 2009 22:39 UTC (Thu) by dmarti (subscriber, #11625)
In reply to: Who might use Chromium OS? by drag
Parent article: Chromium OS source released
Users and buyers aren't necessarily the same. If you're the Family Computer Person, having your web-centric users on a machine that won't run malware or p2p takes a burden away from you. "I know I promised you a computer for your birthday, but after your brother got us fifteen viruses, two identity thefts, and an RIAA lawsuit, you're getting a Google box."
(Log in to post comments)
Users and maintainers
Posted Nov 19, 2009 22:53 UTC (Thu) by drag (subscriber, #31333)
[Link]
Maybe.
I am just not convinced. In order for this to have merit it's going to have
to be hella slick. It's going to have to be so nice and so intuitive that
people are not going to want to run familiar software they already know and
understand.
It's going to be exceptionally difficult for them to pull this one off.
Users and maintainers
Posted Nov 19, 2009 23:46 UTC (Thu) by anselm (subscriber, #2796)
[Link]
I don't think that, realistically, Google's goal is to replace every
single PC in existence with a machine running Chromium OS. (They probably
wouldn't mind if that happened but hey, I'd like a pony, too.)
There are still loads of people around who haven't touched a computer for
their entire lives so far, and so have no preconceived notion of how
software should look like and behave. If Google manages to rope in just
an appreciable fraction of those they'll be more than comfortable for a
user community.
Also, people are moving in droves from their local mail programs to Google
Mail in a browser already. As it turns out, Google Mail is kinda
slick. And if e-mail and web surfing are the main things they do on their
computer, which again holds true for a fairly significant number of
people, Google's approach will probably be just fine for them.
kids today
Posted Nov 20, 2009 0:41 UTC (Fri) by dmarti (subscriber, #11625)
[Link]
These kids today are riding bikes with only one gear, using the one-channel Twitter instead of IRC, drinking PBR -- why not a one-application computer?
Users and maintainers
Posted Nov 20, 2009 20:45 UTC (Fri) by asherringham (subscriber, #33251)
[Link]
I don't think the bar is that high really.
My mum is very computer illiterate and has trouble with the concept of a "window" or "desktop" and finds the trackpad and keyboard hard. I have to repeatedly remind her how to use the "Enter" key ("the BIG key!") to break up long lines.
But guess what? She runs Linux!
This is an older laptop - web browsing and web mail only. She really doesn't need anything else and I don't have to worry about viruses, trojans and assorted malware. No need for slick - just very basic functionality.
Alastair
|
|
|