- September 29, 2009
A commenter on my blog the other day (
mentioned a distinction that I found really interesting between intent generation and intent harvesting. This distinction is critical for understanding how internet advertising works and why it is broken. It also helps explain why sites like the newspapers, blogs, and social networks are getting unfairly low advertising revenues.Today’s link economy is built around purchasing intent harvesting. (Worse still, it’s all based on last click intent harvesting- but that is for another blog post). Most of this happens on search engines or through affiliate programs. Almost no one decides which products to buy based on Google searches or affiliate referrers. They decide based on content sites – Gizmodo, New York Times, Twitter, etc. Those sites generate intent, which is the most important part of creating purchasing intent, which is directly correlated to high advertising revenues.
But content sites have no way to track their role in generating purchasing intent. Often intent generation doesn’t involve a single trackable click. Even if there were some direct way to measure intent generation, doing so would be seen by many today as a blurring of the the advertising/editorial line. So content sites are left only with impression-based display ads, haggling over CPMs without a meaningful measurement of their impact on generating purchasing intent.
All of this has caused a massive shift in revenues from the top to the bottom of the purchasing funnel – from intent generators to intent harvesters. Somehow this needs to get fixed.
Pingback: Stickiness is bad for business cdixon.org – chris dixon's blog
Pingback: Display Advertising and SEO | Blind Five Year Old
I really think that the change is on the way. Google Adwords can play a major part in that as it allows upper-end funnel publishers to get compensated when flagging a user for retrargeting.
www.yanivnizan.com/2010/03/google-adword…
Pingback: Stickiness is bad for business | Igniting Startups - nPost
Pingback: Calculated Crunch News » Blog Archive » A massive misallocation of online advertising dollars
Pingback: Calculated Crunch News Rls » Blog Archive » A massive misallocation of online advertising dollars
Pingback: Facebook is about to try to dominate display ads the way Google dominates text ads cdixon.org – chris dixon's blog
Pingback: How Facebook Plans to Dominate Display Advertising | Startups
Pingback: Display Ad Spending « Digital Marketing & Technology
Pingback: Vocanic » Why the Facebook-Amazon.com integration is bigger than you think
Pingback: Facebook partners with Amazon: Measuring the value of social recommendations | Josh Klein's Blog
Pingback: cdixon.org – chris dixon's blog / Google’s social strategy
Pingback: How Google Can Go After Facebook – And Why Google Needs To Do It « Startups
Pingback: SEO & Internet Marketing Automation Tool