Home
Search
Browse
Submit
Subscribe
Shopping Cart
My Briefcase
Top Papers
Top Authors
Top Institutions
SSRN Blog
Abstract
Download This Paper
|
Share |
Email |
Add to Briefcase
Facebook
|
Twitter
|
CiteULike
|
Permalink
Using the URL or DOI link below will
ensure access to this page indefinitely
Based on your IP address, your paper is being delivered by:
New York, USA
Processing request.
Illinois, USA
Processing request.
Brussels, Belgium
Processing request.
Seoul, Korea
Processing request.
California, USA
Processing request.
If you have any problems downloading this paper, please click on another Download Location above, or view our FAQ File name: SSRN-id2134465. ; Size: 218K
You will receive a perfect bound, 8.5 x 11 inch, black and white printed copy of this PDF document with a glossy color cover. Currently shipping to U.S. addresses only. Your order will ship within 3 business days. For more details, view our FAQ.
Quantity:Total Price = $9.99 plus shipping (U.S. Only)
If you have any problems with this purchase, please contact us for assistance by email: Support@SSRN.com or by phone: 877-SSRNHelp (877 777 6435) in the United States, or +1 585 442 8170 outside of the United States. We are open Monday through Friday between the hours of 8:30AM and 6:00PM, United States Eastern.
Citizens United, Corporate Personhood, and Corporate Power: The Tension between Constitutional Law and Corporate Law
Susanna Kim Ripken
Chapman University School of Law
August 22, 2012
Chapman University Law Research Paper No. 12-10
Abstract:
In Citizens United v. Federal Election Commission, the Supreme Court invalidated strict federal campaign finance laws and upheld the First Amendment right of corporations to use general treasury funds to support or oppose candidates in political elections. Shortly after the case was decided, a grassroots popular movement began calling for an amendment to the Constitution to establish that money is not speech and that human beings, not corporations, are the only “persons” entitled to constitutional rights. The concept of corporate personhood entered the national debate, causing many average Americans to question the legitimacy of corporations’ legal personhood status. Federal and state lawmakers have introduced several bills proposing a constitutional amendment to abolish corporate personhood, and hundreds of cities nationwide have passed municipal resolutions supporting such an amendment. Progressive groups that oppose corporate influence in politics disagree on whether the push for a constitutional amendment is a good idea. This article identifies several problems with the amendment strategy and suggests that the focus on personhood is misplaced. Legal history shows that the personhood label has long been arbitrarily applied in constitutional law cases, and, as a practical matter, personhood is largely indeterminate and sometimes irrelevant. More significantly, corporate personhood and power do not find their origin exclusively in constitutional law, but in long-standing corporate law doctrines and deeply entrenched norms. An attempt to curb corporate power in the political realm through a constitutional amendment does not address the systemic features of corporate law that allow corporate entities to amass great economic and political power. To ignore the tensions that corporate law raises in this regard is to miss the deeper source of corporate ascendance in the modern world.
Number of Pages in PDF File: 46
Keywords: corporate personhood, constitutional personhood, corporate First Amendment rights, free speech, political speech, campaign finance, Citizens United, constitutional amendment, Move to Amend, social movement, popular movement,
JEL Classification: K20, K22, M14
working papers series
Download This Paper
Date posted: August 22, 2012
Suggested Citation
Ripken, Susanna Kim, Citizens United, Corporate Personhood, and Corporate Power: The Tension between Constitutional Law and Corporate Law (August 22, 2012). Chapman University Law Research Paper No. 12-10. Available at SSRN: ssrn.com/abstract=2134465 or dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2134465
Contact Information
Susanna Kim Ripken (Contact Author)
Chapman University School of Law ( email )
One University Drive Orange, CA 92866-1099 United States
Feedback to SSRN (Beta)
What type of feedback would you like to send?
please choose one
Feedback to SSRN (Beta)
Paper statistics
Abstract Views:
534
Downloads:
139
Download Rank:
95,545
People who downloaded this paper also downloaded:
1.
Insider Trading via the Corporation
By
Jesse Fried
2.
Regulating Insider Trading in the Post-Fiduciary Duty Era: Equal Access or Property Rights?
By
Stephen Bainbridge
3.
The Extraterritorial Application of U.S. Securities Fraud Prohibitions in an Increasingly Global Transactional World
By
Joan Heminway
More >
People who downloaded this paper also downloaded:
1.
Insider Trading via the Corporation
By
Jesse Fried
2.
Regulating Insider Trading in the Post-Fiduciary Duty Era: Equal Access or Property Rights?
By
Stephen Bainbridge
3.
The Extraterritorial Application of U.S. Securities Fraud Prohibitions in an Increasingly Global Transactional World
By
Joan Heminway
4.
The Silent Role of Corporate Theory in the Supreme Court’s Campaign Finance Cases
By
Stefan Padfield
5.
An Overview of Insider Trading Law and Policy: An Introduction to the Insider Trading Research Handbook
By
Stephen Bainbridge
6.
Corporate First Amendment Rights after Citizens United: An Analysis of the Popular Movement to End the Constitutional Personhood of Corporations
By
Susanna Ripken
7.
Executive Compensation: Where We are, and How We Got There
By
Kevin Murphy
8.
Fencing Fiduciary Duties
By
Larry Ribstein (deceased)
9.
Flawed Assumptions: A Corporate Law Analysis of Free Speech and Corporate Personhood in Citizens United
By
Anne Tucker
10.
Journeys in Revlon-Land with a Conflicted Financial Advisor: Del Monte and El Paso
By
Robert Miller