Not civilians, but “traitors” to be executed

July 24, 2011 5:09 pm - Author: Eric

I’m continuing to slog through Anders Breivik’s 1500 page “A European Declaration of Independence” (easy to read Word doc file here), and I think the following speaks for itself in terms of both the motive for the crime and the willingness of the author to kill large numbers of people:

3.44 Traitor – classification system – Category A, B and C traitors

“The nation is divided, half patriots and half traitors, and no man can tell which from which.”

Mark Twain

This classification system is used to identify various individual cultural Marxist/ multiculturalist traitors. The intention of the system is to easier identify priority targets and will also serve as the foundation for the future “Nuremberg trials” once the European cultural conservatives reassert political and military control of any given country.

Any category A, B or C traitor is an individual who has deliberately used his or her influence in a way which makes him or her indirectly or directly guilty of the charges specified in this document: 1-8. Many of these individuals will attempt to claim ”ignorance” of the crimes they are accused of.

Category A traitor

-    Political leaders (NGO leaders included)
-    Media leaders (chief editors)
-    Cultural leaders
-    Industry leaders

Category A traitors are usually any current Heads of State, ministers/senators, directors and leaders of certain organisations/boards etc. who are guilty of charges 1-8. Category A traitors consist of the most influential and highest profile traitors.

10 per 1 million citizens.
Punishment: death penalty and expropriation of property/funds

Category B traitor

Category B traitors are cultural Marxist/multiculturalist politicians, primarily from the alliance of European political parties known as ”the MA 100” (parties who support multiculturalism) and EU parliamentarians. They can be elected and non-elected parliamentarians, their advisors and any public and/or corporate servant who has been and still are indirectly or directly implicated in committing the following acts.

Category B traitors can also be individuals from various professional groups (but not limited to): journalists, editors, teachers, lecturers, university professors, various school/university board members, publicists, radio commentators, writers of fiction, cartoonists, and artists/celebrities etc. They can also be individuals from other professional groups such as: technicians, scientists, doctors and even Church leaders. In addition, individuals (investors etc) who have directly or indirectly funded related activities. It’s important to note that the stereotypical ”socialists”, collectivists, feminists, gay and disability activists, animal rights activists, environmentalists etc are to be considered on an individual basis only. Not everyone who are associated with one of these groups or movements is to be considered as a cultural Marxist/multiculturalist.

Former category A traitors; Heads of State, Ministers/Senators etc., directors and leaders of certain organisations/boards etc. can be re-classified as category B traitors for practical targeting reasons (they have lost influence and will not yield the same target value/effect as current category A traitors).

Certain ANTIFA leaders or organisers related to ANTIFA movements (and other dedicated members) are considered category B traitors. Non-essential members are considered category C traitors. Many professionals such as f. example journalists, influential sociologists or university professors etc. are considered and categorized as category B traitors as we consider them political activists and not merely professionals. They will of course claim ignorance and state that they are a-political. This strategy might work for them until the day where they are visited by a Justiciar Knight – their judge, jury and executioner.

1000 per 1 million citizens.
Punishment: death penalty and expropriation of property/funds. Punishment can be reduced under certain circumstances.

Category C traitor

Category C traitors are less influential and lower priority targets (often individuals who have facilitated category A and B traitors) but who are still guilty of charges 1-8.

10 000 per 1 million citizens.
Punishment: fines, incarceration, expropriation (considered as acceptable indirect casualties in larger operations where WMDs are involved).

Category D individuals

Category D individuals have little or no political influence but are facilitating category B and C traitors and/or MA100 political parties/media companies through various means. They are not guilty of charges 1-8 but work with or for individuals who are. The classification is of relevance when calculating/estimating indirect casualties concerning larger operations where WMDs are involved, as any category D individuals is not considered an innocent “civilian” but rather as a secondary servant/facilitator.

20 000-30 000 per 1 million citizens
Punishment: none (not considered civilian)

Number of Category A and B traitors on Western Europe

There are approximately 400 000 category A and B traitors in Western Europe using the current classification system (1010 per million).

France    65 650
Germany    82 820
United Kingdom    62 216
Netherlands    16 665
Belgium    10 807
Sweden    9393
Austria    7839
Norway    4848
Switzerland    498
Luxembourg    7777
Spain    47 167
Italy    60 600
Portugal    10 807
Denmark    5555
Ireland    6060
Greece    11 312
Finland    5353
Iceland    322
Cyprus    800
Malta    417

3.45 Added or diminished emphasis on flagged targets

This term can be used internally within any conservative military order (not that any cell in Phase 1 should be larger than 2 individuals).

Temporary Immunity (diminished emphasis)

”Temporary immunity” is abbreviated TI and the level of significance ranges from 1-3. F example: TI1 indicates insignificant anti-Islamisation principles implemented, and where TI3 indicates considerable anti-Islamisation principles implemented. This type of temporary immunity can be ”awarded” to cultural Marxist/multiculturalist political parties, organisations and individuals who have shown indications of policy shift.

-    TI1 Insignificant anti-Islamisation principles implemented (TI declined)
-    TI2 Some but minimal anti-Islamisation principles implemented (TI declined)
-    TI3 Considerable anti-Islamisation principles implemented (TI granted)

No attacks should occur on TI3 candidates in phase 1. As for TI1-2 candidates, even though immunity has not been granted, any Justiciar Knight should consider other targets if possible. If there aren’t any equivalent targets which would yield the desired result, then TI-1-2 targets would still be the logical choice.

If the policy shift is significant enough over a long period permanent status change may be applied.

Focus Target (added emphasis)

”Focus Target” is abbreviated FT and indicates targets who will yield added results (high value targets) or can be used to flag ”unforgivable” political parties, organisations or individuals who has or still are committing grave crimes.

-    FT1 Above average crimes or above average target/value
-    FT2 Higher…
-    FT3 Highest…
3.46 Killing women on the field of battle – directly or indirectly

Every female category A, B, C traitor or system protector out there is someone’s daughter, someone’s sister or mother. But then again, so are the victims of the current systems, f example the girl who committed suicide after being gang-raped by Muslims.

War isn’t pretty. It never has been. It is essential to know that approximately 60-70% of all cultural Marxists or suicidal humanist are female and up to 20% of police officers and military personnel (system protectors). Being a Justiciar Knight will involve killing our targets, or any system protector trying to stop us, indiscriminately. You will face women in battle and they will not hesitate to kill you. To them, you are just another armed criminal nut case as they will not know your true political agenda until after you have been slain or are apprehended. If you hesitate as much as a second due to the fact that your opponent is female you will fail. You must therefore embrace and familiarise yourself with the concept of killing women, even very attractive women.

It is not a secret that the average cultural conservative is a lot more chivalrous than the average person. After all, extreme feminism is a Marxist concept. As such, anti-Marxists usually have more traditional values and have been taught to revere women as they are the ones who will carry our offspring, the next generations. While being chivalrous is a good thing in ordinary day-to-day life, it will undoubtfully be fatal in any armed confrontation. If you are unable to think and act pragmatically and cynically you will most likely get yourself killed or arrested. Hesitation and doubt will lead to confusion which will severely endanger yourself and your operation. You have no choice but to use logical cynicism on the field of battle.

If you are unwilling or incapable of killing women due to the principles of chivalry you should probably steer away completely from the armed resistance movements and should probably consider creating yet another right wing blog instead.

On a personal level though; had it been up to me, women would not be encouraged to become system protectors at all – police officers nor military personnel. Females on average (of course; there are always exceptions) are physically and mentally inferior (aprox 20-30%) on a field of battle. I am not comfortable with the concept of killing females as they are simply too valuable to be put in harm’s way. However, we have little choice under the current regimes as they are encouraged and even positively discriminated against when applying to become system protectors in many countries.

In any case, all armed resistance fighters really have no choice but to get used to the idea.

Little choice but to execute women. Remember, he is talking about civilians here.

He goes on to specifically discuss the use of fertilizer bombs as well as shooting attacks at barbeques and festivals where the category B traitors might congregate.

Example:

Literature conferences and festivals

This is where many cultural Marxist/PC authors (the disgusting cultural Marxist and traitorous bourgeois elite – the Marxist-Leninists’ of the 68 generation (or sympathisers of this group) meet and socialise.

Prioritised target groups make out the bulk of the participants who attend certain literature conferences and festivals:

•    Writers (90%+ of these individuals support multiculturalism and usually portray their world view through their works)
•    Editors and journalists in cultural Marxist/multiculturalist publications
•    A majority of individuals related to various “cultural Marxist/politically correct” cultural settings and organisations.

Pretty damning stuff.

And, like the fanatic he was, he celebrates the possibility of martyrdom:

You will forever be celebrated by your people as a martyr for your country, protecting your culture and fighting for your kin and for Christendom. You will be remembered as a conservative revolutionary pioneer, one of the brave European Crusader heroes who said; enough is enough, it is time to take back our countries before our multiculturalist traitor elites actually manages to finalize their agenda and sell us all into Muslim slavery. Your sacrifice will be a great source of inspiration for generations of Europeans to come. You will become a role model for hundreds, perhaps thousands of new emerging martyrs fighting the good fight, our fight. And when we seize political and military power in Europe within a few decades, it will be pioneers and historical pioneers like you who will be celebrated with reverence. Revolutionary patriots like the Justiciar Knights will then be celebrated as destroyers of Marxism and the slayer of tyrants; the fearless and selfless protectors of Europe, The Perfect Knights. For there is no greater glory than dying selflessly while pro-actively protecting your people from persecution and gradual demographical annihilation.

I hate people who commit mass murder in order to build a better world. The guy even designed his tombstone!

The front side of the tombstone may be decorated with the following text:

BORN INTO MARXIST SLAVERY ON XX.XX.19XX. DIED AS A MARTYR FIGHTING THE “WESTERN EUROPEAN COUNTRY” MARXIST CRIMINAL REGIME. SIR KNIGHT “FULL NAME”, A JUSTICIAR KNIGHT COMMANDER (or operative) FOR THE PAUPERES COMMILITONES CHRISTI TEMPLIQUE SOLOMONICI, KNIGHTS TEMPLAR AND A LEADER (or member/operative) OF THE ARMED NATIONAL RESISTANCE MOVEMENT, DIED AS A MARTYR FIGHTING FOR THE FREEDOM OF HIS PEOPLE AND THE SOVEREIGNTY OF HIS FATHERLAND ON XX.XX.2XXX. ALL FREE EUROPEANS ARE IN YOUR ETERNAL DEBT.

Back side of the tombstone

The back side of the tombstone has a motif or sculpture of a knight’s armour (this may also be replaced with a shield) displaying three numbers, three significant years marking the two most important battles of Europe (732 and 1683) and includes a prophecy of the third (2083). The back side may be decorated with the following text:

MARTYRDOM BEFORE DHIMMITUDE! NEVER SURRENDER!

The quote “never surrender” is from a statement made by Winston Churchill.

IHSV or IN HOC SIGNO VINCES means “under this sign, you will conquer” and was coined by the first Christian Roman emperor Constantine I  in 312 AD.

What a supreme egomaniacal wackjob.

Incidentally, he claims that abortion too is Cultural Marxism, which justifies a “proportionate” response.

3.24 Principle of Proportionality

The principle of proportionality should be adhered to by those carrying out the armed struggle against the multiculturalist elites of Europe. This means that we should under normal (optimal) circumstances not exceed (per 2010) aprox.
45 000 dead and 1 million wounded cultural Marxists/multiculturalists in Western Europe. The numbers reflect the equivalent number of victims they, themselves, have on their conscience, the results they have inflicted on their own populations due to implementation of the EU’s Eurabia project/European multiculturalism. If you include the total amount of Serb soldiers that died due to the NATO attacks, the numbers will be higher. In addition, approximately 10 000-20 000 Europeans have been killed in Northern Africa, Rhodesia and South Africa due to the cultural Marxist/multiculturalist post-1950 policies. The total number of Europeans the “category A and B traitors” of Western Europe have killed are totalling approximately 100 000 based on these estimates. If you include wider parameters (such as Christian Maronites, Copts, Azyrians) the numbers will range in the hundreds of thousands. Western European regimes chose to ignore the call from one of our protectorates (Christian Lebanon) and tens of thousands died (and are still dying) as a result. If we include global Jihadi genocides of Christians, such as in Sudan (where the Western European regimes have refused to assist the call of our Christian allies due to appeasement of the Islamic regimes) the numbers will range in the millions.

End note: Many conservatives (especially Christian conservatives), however, would insist that the total number of aborted individuals are added as well as direct casualties of the cultural Marxist ideology which totals aprox: 2 million + individuals in Western Europe since the beginning of 1950 until today.

There’s plenty more, including anthrax, nukes, video game references, the best music to inspire Justiciar Knight warriors, what to wear, how to blend in, etc. He really seems to believe he was creating something important, and (again, assuming the screed is his) probably saw the massacre in Norway as a way to both kill “traitors” and draw attention to himself.

Late in the manifesto, he gets into sex. He claims that sexual immorality, promiscuity, hedonism, STDs, and AIDS are all products of Cultural Marxism. However, in an interesting twist, he argues that because people like sex, the sexual revolution should be embraced, and used against the Cultural Marxists:

3.85 The political significance of sex in a cultural conservative future

Sex is probably the most powerful and under analyzed motivator for man on earth. Had it not been for the some abstract illusions of sex, Leiv Eiriksson or Christopher Columbus would probably not have discovered America, Muhammad’s armies would not have conquered much of the world (ref: 72 virgins is a good incentive for martyrdom, wouldn’t you say?), and the cultural Marxists would not have successfully managed to take control of our societies. During the sexual revolution in the 70s, the Marxists managed to infiltrate and claim this liberal concept, enabling them to exploit the sexual revolution for their own benefit.

So how do we preach chastity to a mob who wants unlimited access to free sex? The answer is that we don’t. Instead, we must copy the Marxist strategies by integrating or at least offer any and all liberals the freedom of unlimited sex in a future scenario. We must present concepts that are credible and ensures all aspects of individualism for those who seek it (with the exception of hate-ideologies like multiculturalism, Islam etc). This does not mean that our future societies will end up as anarchies which is what pure liberalism is.  The only difference is that we are at the same time presenting concepts of chastity and chivalry at the same time. So how is this possible, how can we ensure that both conservatives and liberals are happy? The solution is liberal zones segregated from the rest of the society, a more thorough implementation of the US “liberal zone” model. Consider it as a doctrine of “Las Vegasism”. The concept of “Sex and the city lifestyles” will not be glorified as it is today but restricted to our future Las Vegas zones giving everyone who truly desires this form of lifestyle the opportunity to pursue his or her definition of happiness while at the same time protecting the rest of society from social and moral break down. We must never make the mistake of confusing liberal concepts with Marxist concepts. Individualism and the sexual revolution is not a Marxist concept but rather a liberal one. Yes, the cultural Marxists managed to infiltrate various organisations and took credit for the sexual revolution although that is another discussion. Isolated, “sex and the city lifestyle” is relatively harmless, but if you glorify it and ram it down the throat of mainstream society like we see today it becomes a lethal and destructive societal force as we are witnessing which eventually leads to a complete breakdown of moral/ethics, the nuclear family model and a sustainable fertility rate which again is leading us to the extinction of Europeans.

These liberal zones must be completely “ideologically” cut off from the rest of society to avoid cultural contamination. By focusing on this middle way we are respecting the wishes of the conservatives and the liberals. This should be a compromise we can live with.

If we however fail to compromise and instead contribute to ram a puritan and deeply conservative way of life down the throat of everyone we will only defeat ourselves. Unwillingness to reason with the individualists/liberalists will only be counter-productive and will prevent us from ever seizing political power.

Using the sexual revolution to our advantage will contribute to our success.

But later, in somewhat of a contradiction, he proposes cracking down on promiscuity:

An anti-promiscuousity mentality should be included in a future secular social reform agenda and should be spearheaded through the restriction of media rights (restriction in the availability of pro- promiscuous material) and the reform of school curriculums.

The idea and illusion of romantic love should be challenged and deconstructed. Excessive sexuality is a kind of addiction resulting in both physical and social effects, and contributes to disrupt relationships and causes people to lie and cheat to achieve the pleasure of sexual gratification.

Read the whole thing if you are interested as there’s a lot more. I am excerpting from a 1500 page monstrosity. (It’s long enough to be a congressional bill!)

Fascinatingly, he is not only an environmentalist, but (after blaming Cultural Marxists for overpopulation) he calls for reducing the earth’s population:

PCCTS, Knights Templar and a future European Federation must propagate a global population cap of 2,5 billion (1950-level)

Well, there you go. I’d say their work is cut out for them. Breivik didn’t even make a dent in the surplus population.

No wonder the environmentalists aren’t speaking out to defend him.

Enough. I am tired of reading his declaration. This man is not only an egomaniac, he’s a boring windbag.

I wonder whether he killed people because they didn’t want to listen to him.

Seriously, the fact is that this uninteresting mediocrity only got my attention because he killed people. I’d hate to think that wanting to make people read his tedious manifesto might have been a primary motive, but what if it was?

spacer

UPDATE: I may be pointing out the obvious, but the shooting of young people at a Labour Party camp is totally consistent with Breivik’s calls for execution of “traitors.”

The second attack occurred less than two hours later at a youth camp organized by the youth organization (AUF) of the Norwegian Labour Party (AP) on the island of Utøya in Tyrifjorden, Buskerud. An armed gunman disguised as a policeman opened fire at the campers, killing at least 86 attendees,[7][8][9] including personal friends of Prime Minister Jens Stoltenberg and the stepbrother of Norway’s crown princess Mette-Marit.[10]

This massacre was evil and twisted behavior, but the assertion that anti-Cultural Marxism ideology is responsible (or that it is a “consequence” of such ideology) simply does not follow. Any more than the idea that “the world is overpopulated” would be responsible for some maniac unleashing a devastating virus intended to kill off billions.

spacer Print spacer PDF
spacer
Categories: Uncategorized 8 Comments

8 Comments until now

Classical Values » “82 days per killing” July 25th, 2011 (#):

[...] I am.  Considering what he said in his manifesto about the need to kill large number of “traitors,” I think they’d be nuts to ever let him out, no matter what he says or how full of [...]

spacer
Leon Haller July 25th, 2011 (#):

There is nothing wrong with executing those race traitors who have imposed first, coercive racial integration, and second, mass nonwhite immigration, on white nations. We did not vote for this. We did not want these invasions. When CA/USA voters tried to end welfare benefits for illegal aliens in 1994, a Pakistani federal judge simply nullified their votes. That is tyranny, raw.

There is a concerted, intentional effort to extirpate Western civilization and the white race which alone created it. Murdering a bunch of young whites, even if leftists, was evil and tactically stupid. Outside of actual, declared war, killing persons for their opinions cannot be morally justified. And Breivik was hardly a model Occidental nationalist – though he was also extremely intelligent, as far as I can tell.

But someday, the white West may well rise up in righteous rebellion against those who have dispossessed us and tried to destroy us. If we are victorious, there will be widespread de-marxification, much of it violent and impromptu, exactly as was the case wrt de-nazification following WW2. As I have long advocated, it is useful for Occidental patriots to begin compiling lists of race traitors (“cultural marxists”) for future punishment.

spacer
Eric July 25th, 2011 (#):

There is nothing wrong with executing race traitors?

Really? Who is in charge of the “executions”?

And what is a “race traitor”? A “cultural Marxist”?

Are you threatening to kill people, or do you just think murder is OK?

Tell me more. I am intrigued.

Any chance you’re the proud racist who commented here?

majorityrights.com/index.php/weblog/comments/the_white_genocide_evidence_project/

Classical Values » We get annoying comments July 26th, 2011 (#):

[...] a commenter calling himself “Leon Haller” said this earlier: There is nothing wrong with executing those race traitors who have imposed first, coercive [...]

spacer
Leon Haller July 27th, 2011 (#):

Eric July 25th, 2011 (#):
There is nothing wrong with executing race traitors?

Really? Who is in charge of the “executions”?

And what is a “race traitor”? A “cultural Marxist”?

Are you threatening to kill people, or do you just think murder is OK?

Tell me more. I am intrigued.
—————————–
You are insincere.

It should go without saying that I am speaking ethically, not politically or legally. This should be clear to anyone with a basic command of English. Where did I threaten anybody? If someone says “rapists should be executed”, whom is he threatening?

What is your agenda?

I personally would never be involved with anything unlawful. I overpay my CPA just to make sure I don’t violate even the slightest tax law. I obey every law, even ones I strongly believe are themselves immoral.

But I would not condemn Breivik had he executed only national traitors (say the Norwegian immigration minister responsible for allowing Muslim immigration into white, Christian Norway). I condemned him for killing the innocent: that is, young people who had no power to have done anything.

This is about ETHICS, not LEGALITY.

spacer
Eric July 27th, 2011 (#):

You have repeatedly made it very clear that murdering people you consider traitors is philosophically OK.

In another comment, you opined that I am a race traitor.

I think you are a troll and a waste of time.

spacer
Leon Haller July 27th, 2011 (#):

Really? And what exactly is a “troll”? Someone patriotic, as you are not? Or more intelligent than you (multitudes)?

spacer
Leon Haller July 27th, 2011 (#):

Oh, and where did I call you a race traitor? You may well be – I did say you are obviously a hater of white people – but I have no idea of your race. Frankly, you sound Jewish by your method if argumentation (ie defame rather than engage).

Why do you call your site “classical values” anyway? There is nothing classical in it. It reads like a bunch of historically ignorant, PC-libertarians.

Add your Comment!

Name*: Mail Adress*: Blog: Comment*:

Tweets

  • No public Twitter messages.

Subscribe

Subscribe

Email

escheie [AT] yahoo [DOT] com

Links

spacer

Alphecca
spacer

spacer
Puff R.I.P.

spacer
spacer
Middle East Media Research Institute
spacer
Gay Libertarian Site
The Bitch Girls
Join the NRA!
spacer
spacer
SECOND AMENDMENT VIDEO!
Tammy Bruce
Gun Owners of America
spacer
spacer
spacer
spacer
spacer
Hell In A Handbasket
Matt Welch
The Volokh Conspiracy
Virginia Postrel
The Light of Reason
Anger Management
Dustbury.com
Rachel Lucas
JustOneMinute
Boone Country
Catallarchy
spacer
Agenda Bender
Mike Silverman
Steven Malcolm Anderson
Walter in Denver
Impearls
Donald Sensing
Howard Owens
Loco Parentis
spacer
Colby Cosh
VodkaPundit
Radley Balko
Dean's World
baldilocks
The Moderate Voice
Begging to Differ
Kesher Talk
Jeff Jarvis
Doc Searls
Little Green Footballs
Captain Ed
Oh, That Liberal Media!
ICANNfocus.org
God of the Machine
Sandefur's Freespace
Wizbang
Robert Prather
LawPundit
spacer The Anti-Idiotarian Rottweiler
Amygdala
bilious young fogey
why dave bergman is neat
Clowning Glory
Dispatches from the Culture Wars
Anti-Socialist Tendencies
Of Interest
Setting The World To Rights
doubleplusgood infotainment
Scrutineer
Nick Danger, International Man of Mystery
TRITICALE
Random Jottings point2point
Shark Blog
Gene Healy
Six Foot Pole
Andrew Ian Dodge
Lex Talionis
Mind Of Mog
Say Uncle
CAMPVS MAWRTIVS
Annika's Journal & Poetry
A :{FRUSTRATED}: ARTIST
Yet another weird SF fan