Who's Lobbying Hardest Against Sequestration?
Groups urge Congress to lower cap on contractor pay
- By Kellie Lunney
- November 13, 2012
- Comments
- Print this article
- Email this article
- Decrease size Reset Increase size
Top NIST employees could see smaller bonuses in 2013
June 18, 2012 commentsWhite House reopens debate over contractor pay
January 31, 2012 commentsFinal Defense bill contains key contractor provisions
December 14, 2011 commentsSenate-passed Defense bill would cap contractor pay
December 2, 2011 comments
Federal employee unions and other groups on Tuesday called on lawmakers to lower the current compensation cap on non-Defense Department contractors to $400,000.
The letter to the leadership of the House and Senate Financial Services committees urged lawmakers to change the maximum allowable limit on reimbursable contractor pay from $763,029 to $400,000. The Senate’s fiscal 2013 financial services appropriations bill contains a provision lowering the cap to the president’s current annual salary, which is $400,000.
“Due to concerns about both fiscal responsibility and fairness, we believe it is important to reduce the compensation priced and/or reimbursed under U.S. government prime and subcontracts to federal contractor employees,” the letter stated. The coalition that sent the letter included officials from the American Federation of Government Employees, National Treasury Employees Union, Economic Policy Institute, Project on Government Oversight and OMB Watch.
A similar letter was sent in October urging lawmakers on the Armed Services committees to lower the cap on executive compensation for Defense contractors from $763,029 to $230,700.
The Office of Management and Budget in April announced the new statutory cap of $763,029 on contractor pay, a 10 percent hike over the previous limit of $693,951 for the top five employees. The new cap was based on a formula set in 1997.
“Private firms are of course free to pay their employees whatever they deem that they are worth, but the pricing and/or reimbursement provisions of government contracts should not allow such exorbitant rates to be paid by the American people,” the Nov. 13 letter said.
By using this service you agree not to post material that is obscene, harassing, defamatory, or otherwise objectionable. Although GovExec.com does not monitor comments posted to this site (and has no obligation to), it reserves the right to delete, edit, or move any material that it deems to be in violation of this rule.