PhD
Do “Liberation Technologies” Change the Balance of Power Between Repressive StateS
AND CIVIL SOCIETY?
Dissertation Committee:
Dan Drezner, Larry Diamond, Clay Shirky, Carolyn Gideon
Do new information and communication technologies (ICTs) empower repressive regimes at the expense of civil society, or vice versa? For example, does access to the Internet and mobile phones alter the balance of power between repressive regimes and civil society? These questions are especially pertinent today given the role that ICTs played during the recent uprisings in Tunisia, Egypt and beyond. Indeed, as one Egyptian activist stated, “We use Facebook to schedule our protests, Twitter to coordinate and YouTube to tell the world.” But do these new ICTs—so called “liberation technologies”—really threaten repressive rule? The purpose of this dissertation is to use mixed-methods research to answer these questions.
The first half of this doctoral study comprises a large-N econometric analysis to test whether “liberation technologies” are a statistically significant predictor of anti-government protests in countries with repressive regimes. If using the Internet and mobile phones facilitates organization, mobilization and coordination, then one should expect a discernible link between an increase in access to ICTs and the frequency of protests—particularly in repressive states. The results of the quantitative analysis were combined with other selection criteria to identify two country case studies for further qualitative comparative analysis: Egypt and the Sudan. The second half of the dissertation assesses the impact of “liberation technologies” during the Egyptian Parliamentary Elections and Sudanese Presidential Elections of 2010. The analysis focused specifically on the use of Ushahidi—a platform often referred to as a “liberation technology.” Descriptive analysis, process tracing and semi-structured interviews were carried out for each case study.
My dissertation is available for download here in PDF.
Main Contributions and Highlights:
Here are my latest blog posts on my dissertation findings:
* Theorizing Ushahidi: An Academic Treatise
* How Egyptian Activists Kept Their Ushahidi Project Alive Under Mubarak
* Analyzing Election Monitoring Reports from Egypt Using U-Shahid
* ICTs, Democracy, Activism & Dictatorship: Comprehensive Literature Review
* Impact of ICT on Democracy & Activism: Findings from Statistical Studies
98 Responses to PhD
Pingback: Global Voices Summit: Tor and Blocking-Resistance « iRevolution
Pingback: Beating the Chinese Censors: da Vinci redux « iRevolution
Pingback: Tactical Tech’s new Mobile-in-a-Box « iRevolution
Intriguing topic, Mr. Meier. Just curious: have you looked at Foucault’s notion of the Panopticon to negotiate this relationship between authoritarianism and social resistance? In terms of monitoring information flow, recent national security trends in several countries come close to a kind of Panopticon, an ultimate “I” if you will.
Thanks for your comments, Pete, much appreciated!
Yes indeed, Foucault’s Panopticon was an important contributing factor in my decision to pursue this research topic. I made a reference to it in this blog entry:
irevolution.wordpress.com/2008/04/30/netting-war-criminals-using-web-20/
Thanks again for your comments!
Pingback: Social Web: An Empirical Analysis of Networked Political Protests « iRevolution
Pingback: Gene Sharp, Civil Resistance and Technology « iRevolution
Pingback: Impact of ICTs on Repressive Regimes: Findings « iRevolution
Pingback: Smart Mobs » Blog Archive » Impact of ICTs on Repressive Regimes
Pingback: Impact of ICTs on Repressive Regimes: Findings by Patrick Philippe Meier « Remixing the Web for Social Change
Pingback: Democratic Effects of the Internet: Latest Findings « iRevolution
You may be interested in Paul Sturges’ (2004, 2005) liberation struggle information model. Robert Hayes (1993) article on Measurement of information may be invaluable, especially in delineating fact, data, information, understanding, knowledge and decisions. I used these sources to examine the use of sanctioned and clandestine radio broadcasting in pre- and post-independent Zimbabwe
Thanks for theses excellent references, Dr. Wachanga, I really appreciate it!
My name is Mira Nabulsi, I am a Palestinian researcher & I would like to write my PhD thesis on social media and socio-political change in the Arab world, I think your research is really interesting ..
As I am still in the process of preparing my research proposal, I wonder if you can provide me with the list of literature brought up in this summery, or any that you think can be useful .. I still did not decide what my exact focus will be (I might write specifically on Palestine) yet I think finding literature is not an easy task :S
I hope you don’t mind assisting !
Hi Mira, I’d be happy to help, please send me an email: patrick.meier at tufts.edu
Patrick -
great topic, very much looking forward to reading this work. One suggestion: you phrased the research question in an objectivist mode. consider approaching this from a design science perspective.
The objectivist framing pretends you don’t care who wins this war. But you do, we know you do, and you can’t avoid that. So put it upfront.
It also assumes there is a clear-cut answer irrespective of the asker. Which we also know is wrong.
In a way, the only honest answer to your question is “it depends”. It depends on what you call winning and how you go about measuring it.
Rephrasing this as a design science questions would be more like: “How can the right side win?” to answer this, you will have to start from answering the first question, in a modest way, and then move on to clarify who you think should win and why, what actions could help, and experiment with these propositions.
email me if you want to discuss this further. yishaym at gmail
p.s. please tell Mira Nablusi I would also be happy to help her, I have personal vested interests in her research.
Many thanks for your comments, Yishaym.
On objectivity, I got very different guidance from my dissertation committee. They actually suggested I pitch the question the other way, ie, are repressive regimes empowered at the expense of resistance movement. In other words, they will definitely not except my asking “How can the right side win.” Instead they want me to make a case for why the regimes are likely to gain as opposed to the other way around. And of course, “it depends” will always factor in, there’d be no raison d’etre for academia otherwise
Patrick, interesting project. I, however, share Yishaym’s concerns.
“Does the information revolution empower the coercive control of repressive regimes at the expense of social resistance movements, or vice versa? ” Not sure it’s an easy yes-no answer (and depending on how empowerment is defined and what contexts we are talking about). Plenty of literature suggests (I’m more familiar with China) that the interaction between the resistance movement and repressive regimes is not a zero-sum game. Both are getting smarter and more sophisticated as we speak. I’d be really interested in learning how empowerment is operationalized, measured, and how the pluses and minuses are calculated in your project (So I will definitely read your work
ummm. On your right, a dissertation committee. On your left, some bloke from the left. Who do you choose?
Someone once told me the most important thing to remember about your phd is to get it done. Whatever doesn’t fit, leave it for later. If it itches too bad, well, you always have your blog.
Btw, I never said who the right side is, but it seems you, me, your dissertation committee – we all know who the goodies and the baddies are. Personally, I think its more scientific to acknowledge our values and biases, since they will taint our research whether we like it or not. but I’m not necessarily mainstream.
typo: “some bloke from the net”
I should have said – good luck! I’m sure you’ll do a good job.
Hi Meier:
Please contribute a paper for this workshop.
www.iitd.ac.in/events/ICTD2010/
Regards,
Vignesh.
Hello. Great work on all fronts. I am the lead for the pursuit of a City TLD for Ottawa, Canada, i.e. www.protests.ottawa.
I am interested in the role/situation of developing regional portals being developed in the public interest and the negotiations that must take place to ensure common access.
I am curious what you think about Ushahidi and other points in your dissertation and City TLDs.
Cheers
Pingback: Twitter vs. Tyrants: Summary of Congressional Briefing « iRevolution
Pingback: Twitter vs. Tyrants: Remarks by NDI « iRevolution
Pingback: Empirical Study on Impact of Global ICT Use on Democratic Tendency « iRevolution
Pingback: Twitter, Iran and Ping Pong: Mind the Gap « iRevolution
Pingback: Why Dictators Love the Web or: How I Learned to Stop Worrying and Say So What?! « iRevolution
Pingback: Digital Activism and the Puffy Clouds of Anecdote Heaven « iRevolution
Patrick, a friend just pointed me to:
www.cyberdissidents.org/
They maintain a directory of dissident bloggers in the middle east, including those currently imprisoned.
Good deal, many thanks Yishay!
Pingback: Repression 2.0 vs Resistance 2.0 « iRevolution
Pingback: Interview: Patrick Meier über die freie Crisis-Mapping-Software Ushahidi : netzpolitik.org
Pingback: Cyberconflict and Global Politics: New Media, War, Digital Activism « iRevolution
Pingback: Blog Recommendation: iRevolution « On War and Words
Pingback: From Clinton to Ushahidi-Haiti to Digital Repression and Back « iRevolution
Pingback: links for 2010-02-23 « Communications for Development
Pingback: Developing ICT to Meed Social Needs « iRevolution
Pingback: My TEDx Talk: From Photosynth to ALLsynth « iRevolution
Pingback: Is Ushahidi a Liberation Technology? « iRevolution
Hello,
I am shiva, Iranian reaeascher.
I am so interested about your topic. would you please help me to find some references?
Would you mind supplying further details for the above citation – ‘Walker 2007′? I’m keen to reference/further explore this but have been unable to locate any further bibliographic info on the website. Thanks
Hi Sean, it was an MA Thesis by Chris Walker at The Fletcher School. I only have a hard copy.
pingback patrick impact ushahidi social
for its contents. This is a safe-cache copy of the original web site.