The Iron Key: Dialectic materialism and Marxist class

B. Helmut Finnis
Department of Sociology, University of Massachusetts, Amherst

Rudolf T. Long
Department of Future Studies, University of Illinois

1. Joyce and subcultural capitalist theory

In the works of Joyce, a predominant concept is the concept of posttextual sexuality. However, any number of deconstructions concerning a capitalist whole may be discovered. Debord uses the term ‘dialectic materialism’ to denote the role of the observer as reader.

“Sexual identity is unattainable,” says Marx; however, according to Wilson[1] , it is not so much sexual identity that is unattainable, but rather the paradigm, and eventually the meaninglessness, of sexual identity. In a sense, the subject is interpolated into a subcultural capitalist theory that includes culture as a totality. Debord’s model of Marxist class states that consciousness is fundamentally responsible for capitalism.

The primary theme of the works of Joyce is the common ground between society and class. Thus, Lyotard suggests the use of the capitalist paradigm of discourse to deconstruct society. The main theme of Brophy’s[2] critique of Marxist class is the rubicon of capitalist truth.

However, the subject is contextualised into a dialectic materialism that includes culture as a paradox. Baudrillard uses the term ‘Marxist class’ to denote the role of the observer as participant.

In a sense, the subject is interpolated into a subcultural capitalist theory that includes reality as a totality. The figure/ground distinction depicted in Joyce’s Ulysses emerges again in A Portrait of the Artist As a Young Man, although in a more mythopoetical sense.

Thus, if posttextual discourse holds, we have to choose between Marxist class and Sontagist camp. Subcultural capitalist theory suggests that the task of the writer is significant form, given that Foucault’s essay on Marxist class is valid.

Therefore, the primary theme of the works of Joyce is the absurdity, and eventually the genre, of structural society. Sontag promotes the use of dialectic materialism to challenge the status quo.

2. Marxist class and the subcapitalist paradigm of narrative

“Sexual identity is unattainable,” says Marx; however, according to Hubbard[3] , it is not so much sexual identity that is unattainable, but rather the fatal flaw, and subsequent economy, of sexual identity. Thus, the main theme of Brophy’s[4] critique of the subcapitalist paradigm of narrative is a cultural whole. D’Erlette[5] states that the works of Spelling are empowering.

“Society is part of the rubicon of sexuality,” says Lyotard. Therefore, Baudrillard uses the term ‘Marxist class’ to denote not, in fact, theory, but posttheory. The absurdity, and thus the paradigm, of the subcapitalist paradigm of narrative intrinsic to Stone’s JFK is also evident in Natural Born Killers.

In a sense, the premise of precapitalist conceptualist theory suggests that class has intrinsic meaning. Lacan suggests the use of dialectic materialism to modify and read sexual identity.

It could be said that Marx’s essay on neocultural socialism states that academe is intrinsically meaningless. Baudrillard uses the term ‘the subcapitalist paradigm of narrative’ to denote a mythopoetical totality.

Therefore, Sontag promotes the use of Marxist class to deconstruct hierarchy. The subject is contextualised into a subcapitalist paradigm of narrative that includes narrativity as a whole.

3. Expressions of genre

In the works of Stone, a predominant concept is the distinction between ground and figure. But if the capitalist paradigm of context holds, we have to choose between the subcapitalist paradigm of narrative and Lacanist obscurity. The premise of dialectic materialism holds that language is used to entrench the status quo.

If one examines Marxist class, one is faced with a choice: either reject the subcapitalist paradigm of narrative or conclude that sexuality is capable of significance, given that art is distinct from language. However, Long[6] suggests that we have to choose between material narrative and subdialectic libertarianism. Dialectic materialism implies that narrativity, paradoxically, has significance.

But Bataille suggests the use of textual desublimation to attack class. Many situationisms concerning the subcapitalist paradigm of narrative exist.

In a sense, Foucault’s analysis of Marxist class states that discourse comes from the collective unconscious. The primary theme of the works of Stone is the role of the participant as reader.

Therefore, if dialectic materialism holds, we have to choose between the subcapitalist paradigm of narrative and the neosemioticist paradigm of narrative. The main theme of la Tournier’s[7] essay on dialectic materialism is the defining characteristic, and eventually the absurdity, of postpatriarchialist sexual identity.

4. Stone and the subcapitalist paradigm of narrative

“Language is part of the futility of sexuality,” says Marx; however, according to Sargeant[8] , it is not so much language that is part of the futility of sexuality, but rather the genre, and some would say the collapse, of language. However, the premise of dialectic narrative holds that government is capable of deconstruction. The primary theme of the works of Madonna is a self-supporting paradox.

In a sense, the subject is interpolated into a subcapitalist paradigm of narrative that includes art as a totality. La Tournier[9] states that the works of Madonna are an example of mythopoetical Marxism.

Thus, dialectic materialism implies that discourse is created by the masses, given that Baudrillard’s model of the subcapitalist paradigm of narrative is invalid. In The Ticket that Exploded, Burroughs examines Marxist class; in Queer, although, he reiterates Lyotardist narrative.

In a sense, Marxist class holds that consciousness is capable of truth. If neotextual dialectic theory holds, we have to choose between the subcapitalist paradigm of narrative and pretextual deappropriation.

5. Realities of meaninglessness

If one examines Derridaist reading, one is faced with a choice: either accept dialectic materialism or conclude that the purpose of the observer is social comment, but only if art is interchangeable with language; otherwise, expression is a product of the collective unconscious. It could be said that the subject is contextualised into a subcapitalist paradigm of narrative that includes culture as a reality. Bataille uses the term ‘capitalist discourse’ to denote the rubicon, and therefore the meaninglessness, of postdialectic sexual identity.

In a sense, Baudrillard promotes the use of dialectic materialism to challenge class divisions. Sartre uses the term ‘Batailleist `powerful communication” to denote the difference between class and sexual identity.

Therefore, the figure/ground distinction prevalent in Burroughs’s The Soft Machine emerges again in Queer, although in a more self-falsifying sense. Lyotard uses the term ‘Marxist class’ to denote not theory, but pretheory.

1. Wilson, V. N. (1980) Libertarianism, presemiotic nihilism and dialectic materialism. University of California Press

2. Brophy, K. ed. (1973) Deconstructing Marx: Marxist class and dialectic materialism. Panic Button Books

3. Hubbard, E. L. (1982) Marxist class in the works of Spelling. And/Or Press

4. Brophy, N. ed. (1999) The Absurdity of Class: Dialectic materialism, Debordist image and libertarianism. Panic Button Books

5. d’Erlette, L. Y. (1983) Marxist class in the works of Stone. University of Georgia Press

6. Long, T. ed. (1977) Discourses of Fatal flaw: Libertarianism, the postpatriarchialist paradigm of expression and dialectic materialism. O’Reilly & Associates

7. la Tournier, V. C. T. (1992) Dialectic materialism and Marxist class. Loompanics

8. Sargeant, S. ed. (1981) Reinventing Socialist realism: Dialectic materialism in the works of Madonna. University of Illinois Press

9. la Tournier, O. D. U. (1973) Marxist class in the works of Burroughs. Oxford University Press

The essay you have just seen is completely meaningless and was randomly generated by the Postmodernism Generator. To generate another essay, follow this link. If you liked this particular essay and would like to return to it, follow this link for a bookmarkable page.

The Postmodernism Generator was written by Andrew C. Bulhak using the Dada Engine, a system for generating random text from recursive grammars, and modified very slightly by Josh Larios (this version, anyway. There are others out there).

This installation of the Generator has delivered 8463179 essays since 25/Feb/2000 18:43:09 PST, when it became operational.

More detailed technical information may be found in Monash University Department of Computer Science Technical Report 96/264: “On the Simulation of Postmodernism and Mental Debility Using Recursive Transition Networks”. An on-line copy is available from Monash University.

More generated texts are linked to from the sidebar to the right.

If you enjoy this, you might also enjoy reading about the Social Text Affair, where NYU Physics Professor Alan Sokal’s brilliant(ly meaningless) hoax article was accepted by a cultural criticism publication.

Both comments and pings are currently closed.