Traditional
Chinese | Simplified Chinese
If you have a question that hasn't been answered
below, or if you have a good answer to a common
question, please send
it our way. For answers to questions specifically
about Vegan Outreach, our About
section.
Animals
- Why should
we care about animals?
- What about free
range?
- What
about kosher? (external link)
- What about honey; or insects
killed by pesticides or during harvest?
- Do
you think it is wrong to keep an animal for a pet?
- What
about animal experimentation?
Health and Nutrition
Ethics and Religion
- Why
is it wrong to eat meat?
- Does
religion play a role in the vegan community?
- Doesn't
the Bible say we should eat meat?
- What
do you think about abortion?
- Plants feel
too.
Going Vegan
- Isn't
it hard to go vegan?
- Isn't
being vegan expensive?
- 99% Vegan?
- What
are some hidden animal ingredients?
- Is
refined sugar vegan?
- What about
organic?
- What
about honey and silk?
Vegan Advocacy and Activism
- How
can I get involved in vegan advocacy?
- Why focus on
vegan outreach?
- Why not
change the laws?
- What
are the pros/cons of economic sabotage?
- How
can I get a job with Vegan Outreach / another animal
organization?
- How
can I start a group at my college / in my area?
Animals
Why
should we care about animals?
Most people believe that unnecessary
suffering is bad. Other animals -- particularly
vertebrates -- suffer physical pain and
even emotional stress in much the same
way humans do. Because of this, we should
take animals' suffering seriously. Because
animal products are not a necessary part
of our diet, becoming vegan is one of
the most effective ways to reduce animals'
suffering.
For more, see Beyond
Might Makes Right and Animal
Liberation by Peter Singer.
Why should people sacrifice convenience,
cravings, and cost for the sake of an
animal?
We claim to be moral beings who do not
act merely to satisfy hedonistic impulses.
We would not want to live in a society
where people were free to satisfy all
their cravings freely, where the strongest
could cause suffering for the weaker if
they wanted to do so. Likewise, how can
we justify satisfying all our cravings
for animal products, when animals must
suffer in order to provide them?
Happily, there is nothing inherently
less satisfying or more expensive in a
vegan diet. Beans and rice are less expensive
than beef or pork; heating up a Boca Burger
is less expensive than buying a Big Mac;
and most people find vegan food to be
as tasty as non-vegan food. Even if this
were not the case, most vegans don't consume
animals or animal products because they
do not want to be the cause of needless
suffering, regardless of the convenience,
taste, or cost. Living an ethically consistent
life is more important.
Won't the animals just die
anyway? And if we don't eat the animals, won't they
overrun the world?
We don't just happen to kill and eat
animals to save them from dying a natural
death. We breed more than 9 billion farm
animals in the U.S. each year because
of the consumer demand for animal products.
If we stop buying animal products, animal
industries will have no incentive to keep
breeding these animals.
Why should
I concern myself with non-human animal
suffering when there are so many people
suffering in the world?
We each have limited time, energy, and
money to offer. The causes and cures of
human suffering are complex, often distant,
and difficult to address, especially by
an individual. The causes and cures of
animal suffering are often simpler and
all around us. Making the choice to adopt
a vegan diet can have a far-reaching effect
on reducing suffering in the world.
Peter Singer writes in Animal Liberation:
Among the factors that make it difficult to arouse
public concern about animals, perhaps the hardest
to overcome is the assumption that "human beings
come first" and that any problem about animals
cannot be comparable, as a serious moral or political
issue, to the problems about humans. A number of
things can be said about this assumption. First,
it is in itself an indication of speciesism. How
can anyone who has not made a thorough study of
the topic possibly know that the problem is less
serious than problems of human suffering? One can
claim to know this only if on assumes that animals
really do not matter, and that however much they
suffer, their suffering is less important than the
suffering of humans. But pain is pain, and the importance
of preventing unnecessary pain and suffering does
not diminish because the being that suffers is not
a member of our species. What would we think of
someone who said that "whites come first"
and that therefore poverty in Africa does not pose
as serious a problem as poverty in Europe?
It is true that many problems in the world deserve
our time and energy. Famine and poverty ...all are
major issues, and who can say which is the most
important? yet once we put aside speciesist biases,
we can see that the oppression of nonhumans by humans
ranks somewhere along with these issues. The suffering
that we inflict on nonhuman beings can be extreme,
and the numbers involved are gigantic ... [and]
should cause at least as much concern, especially
since this suffering is so unnecessary and could
easily be stopped if we wanted to stop it. Most
reasonable people want to prevent war, racial inequality,
poverty, and unemployment; the problem is that we
have been trying to prevent these things for years,
and now we have to admit that, for the most part,
we don't really know how to do it. By comparison,
the reduction of the suffering of nonhuman animals
at the hands of humans will be relatively easy,
once human beings set themselves to do it.
In any case, the idea that "humans come first"
is more often used as an excuse for not doing anything
about either human or nonhuman animals than as a
genuine choice between incompatible alternatives.
For the truth is that there is no incompatibility
here ... there is nothing to stop those who devote
their time an energy to human problems from joining
the boycott of the products of agribusiness cruelty.
It takes no more time to be a vegetarian than to
eat animal flesh. In fact ... those who claim to
care about the well-being of human beings and the
preservation of our environment should become vegetarians
for that reason alone. They would thereby increase
the amount of grain available to feed people everywhere,
reduce pollution, save water and energy, and cease
contributing to the clearing of forests; moreover,
since a vegetarian diet is cheaper than one based
on meat dishes, they would have more money available
to devote to famine relief, population control,
or whatever social or political cause they thought
most urgent. ... [W]hen nonvegetarians say that
"human problems come first," I cannot
help wondering what exactly it is that they are
doing for human beings that compels them to continue
to support the wasteful, ruthless exploitation of
farm animals."
Nobel Laureate, Romain Rolland wrote in Jean
Christophe: To one whose mind is free, there
is something even more intolerable in the suffering
of animals than in the sufferings of humans. For with
the latter, it is at least admitted that suffering
is evil and that the person who causes it is a criminal.
But thousands of animals are uselessly butchered every
day without a shadow of remorse. If any person were
to refer to it, they would be thought ridiculous.
And that is the unpardonable crime. That alone is
the justification of all that humans may suffer. It
cries vengeance upon all the human race. If God exists
and tolerates it, it cries vengeance upon God.
What about
free range?
A growing number of people are looking to "free-range"
products as an alternative to factory farmed animal
products. Eggs (and poultry) may be labeled as "free-range"
if they have USDA-certified access to the outdoors.
No other criteria, such as environmental quality,
size of the outside area, number of birds, or space
per bird, are included in this term.
The Associated Press reported on March
11, 1998:
Free-range chickens conjure up in some
consumers minds pictures of contented
fowl strolling around the barnyard,
but the truth is, all a chicken grower
needs to do is give the birds some access
to the outdoorswhether the chickens
decide to take a gambol or stay inside
with hundreds or thousands of other
birds, under government rules growers
are free to label them free-range.
As all free-range animals are still
viewed as objects to be killed for food,
they are subject to abusive handling,
transport, and slaughter. Free-range
animals, like all animals used for their
milk and eggs, are still slaughtered
at a fraction of their normal life expectancy.
For more information, see this
page and visit Compassion
Over Killing
What about honey
/ insects killed by pesticides or during
harvest?
What is a vegan? The general definition
of a vegan is "someone who does not
use animal products." And one reason
to avoid these products is to prevent
pain and suffering. But it is not clear
which organisms are considered animals,
nor which organisms can experience pain
and suffering.
The behavior of animals is probably the
criterion most people use to base their
opinions on whether animals feel pain.
Most people agree that cats, dogs, and
other mammals feel pain. In fact, when
some people say 'animal,' they mean 'mammal'.
Even the Merriam-Webster Dictionary lists
mammal' as a synonym for 'animal.'
It is not as easy for everyone to agree
if birds, reptiles, fish, and invertebrates
feel pain. On the other hand, many people
seriously claim that plants feel pain.
Therefore, defining 'animal' by what people
generally believe is not going to be productive.
An alternative way to define 'animal'
is to use a scientific definition. But
even a scientific definition of 'animal'
has problems:
Constructing a good definition of animals
is not as easy as it might first appear.
There are exceptions to nearly every
criterion for distinguishing an animal
from other life forms.
Biology, 3rd Ed, Campbell, 1993
If vegans are going to follow a technical
or scientific definition of the word 'animal,'
then sponges (Porifera) are included.
Though considered animals, sponges lack
true tissues and have no nervous system.
They cannot feel pain or suffer any more
than plants. So what would be the point
of including sponges in a vegan definition
of 'animal'?
Instead of trying to define 'animal,'
we should simply try to avoid products
that cause suffering and harm to nonhuman
organisms by figuring out as best we can
which feel pain.
It is possible to understand what goes
on in certain portions of the human brain,
and then compare the human brain to the
brains of animals that are closely related
to the animals from which humans have
evolved. In so doing, all vertebrates
(i.e., fish, amphibians, reptiles, mammals,
and birds) appear to have what is necessary
to feel certain types of pain. Vertebrates
are also the animals involved in most
of the practices to which vegans object.
Invertebrates (such as insects, mollusks,
crustaceans, and silkworms) are different
because their evolutionary history diverged
from ours long before the evolution of
fish, the oldest vertebrates. In fact,
we are more closely related to starfish
(invertebrates with no brain) than to
cephalopods (squid and octopi), who have
the largest brains of all the invertebrates.
Since their nervous systems developed
along a different path, it is very hard
to know what they do and do not feel.
Bivalves (a class of mollusk; including
oysters, clams, mussels, and scallops)
are much more complex than sponges. They
don't have a brain, but rather very basic
nerve ganglia (bunches of nerves). It
is doubtful that their nervous systems
are developed enough to be conscious of
pain. Because they have nervous tissue,
there is an argument to be made for avoiding
products that may have harmed bivalves.
Insects (including bees) do have brains.
But their brains are not highly developed,
and they are likely not large enough to
facilitate the consciousness
of pain.
So is honey vegan? Our best answer is
"We don't know." If one is concerned
about doing harm to insects, it's not
clear that the production of honey involves
any more pain for insects than the production
of most vegetables or alternative sweeteners,
since the harvesting and transportation
of all crops involves some insect deaths.
How should vegans treat this issue publicly?
We tend to think that making an issue
about honey allows people to marginalize
vegans as being in favor of insect rights.'
Most people won't yet face the pain and
suffering involved in meat. Equating meat
with honey probably makes the vegan case
nonsensical to the average person.
Saying that honey is a significant ethical
issue brings in a range of other issues
that people can easily dismiss veganism,
reducto ad absurdum. Can't eat honey?
Can't kill cockroaches? Can't swat mosquitoes?
Squashing flies with your car is the same
as eating veal?
At this point in history, the obvious
and undeniable issues should receive our
focus. We should probably cut people some
slack when it comes to insects, even if
we ourselves see value in the avoidance
of harming them.
And this brings us back to the original
question of what is a 'vegan'? Perhaps
instead of defining a vegan as "someone
who does not use animal products,"
we should define a vegan as "someone
who reasonably avoids products that cause
suffering to nonhumans."
This might upset some people who feel
that without a dogmatic approach (i.e.,
a governing body making rules for everyone
else), veganism will become meaningless
as people will be rationalizing all sorts
of behavior. But as the situation stands
now, veganism's dogmatic overtones not
only
drive people away, but make them not
even consider giving up many animal products.
If we allowed people to call themselves
'vegan' and let them decide what is reasonable,
we could then try to convince them using
reason, rather than dogma. How can we
scare people away by telling them to do
what they think is most reasonable? We
think the animals would be much better
off with this approach both in the short
and long run.
Do
you think it is wrong to keep an animal
for a pet?
In terms of reducing suffering, there
is nothing inherently wrong in living
with another animal. In terms of the specifics,
it depends. If you were to take an animal
from a shelter, you would be giving that
individual a happy home and a good life
(assuming you would be good to them).
If you were to get an animal from a pet
store, you would be supporting and expanding
the breeding of animals for pets -- which
would, most likely, increase the overall
suffering in the world.
Vegan Outreach does not take a position on whether
dogs and, especially, cats should be vegan. People
who have tried vegan diets with their pets have provided
us with information indicating that, if appropriately
planned, many (and possibly most) dogs and cats may
do well on a vegan diet -- but some cats do not. See
also this
book review.
What
about animal experimentation?
Two Vegan Outreach philosophy pieces
touch on this: Beyond
and Theory.
You are not required to be anti-vivsection
to stop eating meat. Regardless of one's
views on this or any other issue, you
can reduce the amount of suffering in
the world by ceasing to eat meat.
Health and Nutrition
Is a vegan
diet healthy?
As with any diet, a vegan diet requires
planning. However, when properly planned,
a vegan diet can be considerably healthier
than a traditional American diet. In its
1996 position paper on vegetarian diets,
the American Dietetic Association reported
that vegan and vegetarian diets can significantly
reduce one's risk of contracting heart
disease, colon and lung cancer, osteoporosis,
diabetes, kidney disease, hypertension,
obesity, and a number of other debilitating
conditions.
Cows' milk contains ideal amounts of
fat and protein for young calves, but
far too much for humans. And eggs are
higher in cholesterol than any other food,
making them a leading contributor to cardiovascular
disease.
Vegan foods, such as whole grains, vegetables,
fruits, and beans, are low in fat, contain
no cholesterol, and are rich in fiber
and nutrients. Vegans can get all the
protein they need from legumes (e.g.,
beans, tofu, peanuts) and grains (e.g.,
rice, corn, whole wheat breads and pastas);
calcium from broccoli, kale, collard greens,
tofu, fortified juices and soymilks; iron
from chickpeas, spinach, pinto beans,
and soy products; and B12 from fortified
foods or supplements. With planning, a
vegan diet can provide all the nutrients
we were taught as schoolchildren came
only from animal products.
For more information, see our Health
section; specifically, Staying
Healthy on Plant-Based Diets
Ethics and Religion
Why
is it wrong to eat meat?
It's not a question of being "right"
or "wrong." If one wants fewer
animals to suffer and die, then one can
stop supporting such practices by not
eating animal products.
Does
religion play a role in the vegan community?
Some vegans find that their religious
views support their ethical commitment.
For other vegans, religion has nothing
to do with their commitment.
For more, visit the Biospirituality
site and the Christian
Vegetarian Association
Doesn't
the Bible say we should eat meat?
Nowhere in the Bible does it say that
we are required to eat animals. Just because
the Bible doesn't explicitly forbid something
doesn't make it right. For example:
When your brother is reduced to poverty
and sells himself to you, you shall
not use him to work for you as a slave....
Such slaves as you have, male or female,
shall come from the nations round about
you; from them you may buy slaves. You
may also buy the children of those who
have settled and lodge with you and
such of their family as are born in
the land. These may become your property,
and you may leave them to your sons
after you; you may use them as slaves
permanently.
Leviticus 25: 39-46
There are many different interpretations
of the Bible. Among them is the view that
Eden was the state-of-being that God desired
for humanity, and in this state, Adam
and Eve ate no animal products.
There are plenty of devout Christians
and Jews who are vegetarian and vegan,
and most theologians would agree that
a benevolent God is not going to condemn
someone for being compassionate to animals.
For a collection of religious perspectives,
visit The
Christian Vegetarian Association and
Religion
and Vegetarianism
What
do you think about abortion?
Whatever our opinion on abortion, each
one of us can reduce suffering by not
buying meat, eggs, and dairy.
Plants feel
too.
This statement is often made by people
trying to rationalize that since plants
feel pain, it must be okay to kill animals.
They usually never make the similar leap
of saying that since plants feel pain
it must be okay to kill humans.
For plants to feel physical pain, they
must have some sort of organized tissue
which, upon stimulation, would activate
a structure in the plant that is conscious
and could perceive the stimulation as
painful. There are no structures within
plants that are analogous to the pain
receptors, neurons, and pain-perceiving
portions of the brains of vertebrate animals.
Animals, being mobile, benefit from their
ability to sense pain; but plants simply
have no biological or evolutionary need
for the experience of pain. Even if, contrary
to all evidence, plants did feel pain,
it would still be preferable to be vegan.
More plants are killed in non-vegan diets,
as more plants must be harvested to feed
animals.
Going Vegan
Isn't
it hard to go vegan?
It can be, especially if you hold yourself
to too
high a standard. But the important
thing is to make changes you feel comfortable
with, at your own pace. While reducing
your consumption of animal products completely
may be ideal, any reduction is a step
in the right direction. The vegan lifestyle
is an ongoing progression. Everyone should
go at their own pace and remember that
all steps towards veganism are positive.
It is most important to focus on avoiding
the products for which animals are bred
and slaughtered. Animal by-products will
exist as long as there is a demand for
primary meat and dairy products. When
it comes to avoiding items that contain
small amounts of by-products, vegans must
decide for themselves where to draw the
line. Some vegans will adjust their level
of abstinence according to the circumstances.
For example, as a consumer, you might
make sure the bread you buy is not made
with whey; but as a dinner guest, you
may accept bread without asking to see
the ingredients. These types of compromises
can actually hasten the spread of veganism,
in that they help counter the attitude
that it's very hard to be vegan.
Isn't
being vegan expensive?
There is nothing inherently more expensive about
a vegan diet. If a person wants to replicate his/her
previous diet with animal analogous, then yes, it
can be more expensive to buy veggie burgers, prepared
seitan, Rice Dream Supreme, etc. But pasta, beans,
potatoes, breads, fruits and vegetables are all generally
less expensive than the animal products of similar
nutritional value.
I want to be vegan, but how can I give
up the taste of milk, cheese, and ice
cream?
There are a lot of good milk substitutes.
To start off, try Silk
or Better Than Milk. These two have a
taste and consistency most like dairy
milk. There are also several good ice
cream substitutes. Try Soy Delicious or
Tofutti. As for going to the local ice
cream shop, they usually have sorbet,
which is usually vegan (fruit sorbet is
vegan, but chocolate is not). Sherbet
is not vegan. There are a few cheese substitutes,
but most are somewhat lacking. Soymage
makes a cheddar block that is very good.
Tofutti makes American cheese slices that
are a dead ringer for the real thing,
and even melt well for sandwiches. Tofutti
also makes a vegan cream cheese that is
great on bagels. There are even a few
vegan yogurts now. Whole Soy yogurts are
excellent. Experiment with the offerings
in your supermarket or natural foods store
and see what you like.
Keep in mind that veganism is not so
much about 'purifying yourself' as it
is about reducing animal suffering and
environmental harm, as well as improving
our health. I know people who say that
they could never give up cheese, so they
don't do anything. It seems to me that,
even if they didn't give up cheese entirely,
if they started using rice milk instead
of regular milk, than that is a step in
the right direction.
99% Vegan?
Sometimes a product will be labeled as
vegan but also be labeled as "99% dairy
free." What is usually going on here
is that this product is being made on
machines that are also used to make products
with dairy. Thus there might be residual
dairy on the machinery. Because some people
have severe allergies to milk, the company
cannot claim that the product is dairy-free.
The alternative is for them to steam-clean
their machinery before running the carob
chips. This would not do anything to advance
the cause of veganism -- no fewer animals
would be exploited. To the contrary, it
would increase the costs of the chips,
making the vegan product appear less appealing
to the general consumer.
See also On Living
With Compassion and Activism
and Veganism Reconsidered: Personal Thoughts at the
New Millennium
What
are some hidden animal ingredients?
In general, we recommend that vegans
concentrate their attention on the most
obvious animal ingredients, instead of
getting bogged down by reading lists for
every possible animal-derived ingredient.
Our experience has been that many vegans
burn out because they are worn down by
the details, missing the true
meaning of veganism.
See also Activism
and Veganism Reconsidered: Personal Thoughts
at the New Millennium
Is refined
sugar vegan?
It depends on how you define 'vegan.'
Refined sugars do not contain any animal
products, and so by an ingredients-based
definition of vegan, refined sugar is
vegan. However, some refined sugar is
processed with animal bone char. The charcoal
is used to remove color, impurities, and
minerals from sugar. The charcoal is not
'in' the sugar, but is used in the process
as as a filter. Thus by a process-based
definition of vegan, refined sugar may
not be considered vegan. For those who
would prefer not to use refined sugar,
there are several alternatives: raw, turbinado,
beet sugar, succanat, date sugar, fructose,
barley malt, rice syrup, corn syrup, molasses,
and maple syrup.
However, if one accepts a process-based
definition of vegan, then many other familiar
products would also not be considered
vegan. For instance, steel and vulcanized
rubber are produced using animal fats
and, in many areas, groundwater and surface
water is filtered through bone charcoal
filters. So, is a box of pasta that contains
no animal products, but has transported
to the store in a steel truck on rubber
wheels and then cooked in boiling water
at your home, vegan? Under a process-based
definition, possibly not. But according
to such a definition, it would be difficult
to find any product in this country
that is "vegan."
There is another point about definitions
that comes to mind. Perhaps, in the above
example, the pasta maker also makes an
egg pasta. The same machinery is used,
and traces of egg are in the 'vegan' pasta;
would the pasta not be vegan?
Again, we recommend that vegans concentrate
their attention on the most obvious animal
ingredients and the true
meaning of veganism. In our experience,
concentrating on processing or on trace
ingredients can make a vegan diet appear
exceedingly difficult and dissuade people
from adopting it.
What about
organic?
Although 'organic' foods may be preferred
for many of the same reasons that vegan
foods are (animal welfare, environmental
quality, and health), a food is usually
considered vegan regardless of whether
or not it is organic.
What
about honey and silk?
Again, it depends on one's definition
of vegan. Insects are animals, and so
insect products, such as honey and silk,
are often not considered vegan. Many vegans,
however, are not opposed to using insect
products, because they do not believe
insects are conscious of pain. Moreover,
even if insects were conscious of pain,
it's not clear that the production of
honey involves any more pain for insects
than the production of most vegetables
or other sweeteners, since the harvesting
and transportation of all crops involves
insect deaths. The question remains a
matter of scientific debate and personal
choice. When cooking or labeling food
for vegans -- particularly vegans you
don't know -- it's best to be on the safe
side and not include honey. As for vegan
advocacy, we think it's best to avoid
the issue as a defining one.
For more, see What
about insects?
Vegan Advocacy & Activism
How
can I get involved in vegan advocacy?
There's lots you can do. See our Tips
for Vegan Advocacy for ideas.
Why
focus on vegan outreach?
99% of the animals killed in the U.S. are farm animals.
Each year more than 9 billion animals are raised in
factory farms and killed for food in this country.
While animal agriculture is certainly not the only
form of animal abuse, it is by far the largest. If
5% of Americans were to stop eating animals, far more
suffering would be prevented than if we completely
abolished every other form of animal exploitation
in the U.S. As Gary Francione of the Rutgers Animal
Law Clinic has said, "If you can help ten people to
go vegetarian in a year, you have done more good than
most animal rights organizations. Moreover, promoting
veganism has the potential additional benefits of
reducing human disease and environmental problems.
For more, see Chart depicting
number of animals slaughtered for human use.
Why not change the law?
See this page.
What
are the pros/cons of economic sabotage?
For our perspective, see Activism
and Veganism Reconsidered: Personal Thoughts
at the New Millennium.
How
can I get a job with Vegan Outreach /
another animal organization?
At this time, VO does not have any employment opportunities.
A list of job openings in the animal rights movement
can be found on-line, including PETA,
PCRM,
and HSUS.
Before you decide to work with an animal
rights group, you might want to ask yourself,
"What would I do with my life if
there were no animal suffering?"
If you can answer with a career that holds
your interest and that you would like
to do, then I would follow whatever path
is needed to pursue that career and do
animal advocacy in your free time. If
your gut feeling is that nothing holds
your interest but working for animal rights
full-time, then by all means pursue a
job within the movement.
Many people contact us because they've
had enough of the business world and want
to be able to help the animals full time
and make a difference in their career.
The animals nee
|