PR people: you’re not blocked, but do your homework
Chris Anderson rants about the woeful life of being the editor of a large publication who receives an endless torrent of spammy-smelling PR email from “lazy flacks” — all stuff about which I’ve zero knowledge. (Actually, I’m sure that’s probably where the comparisons end between our jobs — but who knows.) He then leapfrogs the next few traditional steps (namely, hitting the delete key, hitting the unsubscribe link, quickly replying to these people, or even having his assistant call their bosses) and openly publishes the names and email addresses of hundreds of PR people for spammers to have their way with. Um, okay. Chris, it’s not the same.
Let’s cut to the chase: yes, unfortunately most PR people don’t do their homework. They get their target’s email address (from that target’s site, Google, a media list like Bacon’s, or wherever else) and add X editor to whatever blast they’re cooking up because — as you probably know — many of these “flacks” are paid (extra) for results (read: stories in the media about their company / client). Yes, the resulting PR spam is ridiculously irritating and, when ignored, often leads to embarrassingly clueless and time-wasting followup calls.
But these people aren’t out to make our lives harder, and many of them are just doing what they can with what’s become a severely broken system between media relations and the media. For all our communications tools PR often reminds editors more of telemarketing than valued outreach. Can these firms and companies do a better job at targeting the most relevant publications (and editors therein)? No doubt, so in that sense Chris’s post is founded in the right reasons. PR people simply need to do a cursory amount of relationship-building to know who to get in touch with instead of just spamming the top of the food chain in the hopes of a trickled-down story. But I’m still not sure how lofty disinterest and spoon-feeding spam databases is the correct response to a broken system.
(For reference, this is the same problem faced by editors of publications large and small. Personally, I’ve dealt with it for years with some combination of ignoring / deleting, replying with a template, verbally rejecting calls, or in some cases telling the completely misguided ones only to call / email back when they actually grok Engadget and have something directly relevant to our coverage. Ask around, I’m not shy about doing this — it’s better for both parties, so far as I can tell. I even wrote a post about it.)
PR strategists interested in making real changes about this whole process should feel free to get in touch to discuss further. And don’t you dare add my personal email address to any lists! (Joking. But not really.)
Comments (8)
-
Oct 30, 2007 PermalinkBlueBlog: PR Tips For Startups: How To Get And Keep The Media Attention:
[...] timing that on a day when Alex posts this article Chris Anderson opens up on traditional PR (read the comments, some are hilarious: “Hey! I’m on that [...]
-
Oct 31, 2007 PermalinkChris Anderson is Mad as Hell:
[...] Block from Engadget also has some interesting thoughts on this little [...]
-
Nov 2, 2007 PermalinkConducting PR in the Million-channel Blogiverse:
[...] SiliconValleyWatcher Topaz Partners How to Split an Atom Mobhappy IPDemocracy Behind the Buzz Ryan Block Geoff [...]
-
Feb 6, 2008 PermalinkAnn Shea:
Hi Chris,
I enjoyed this post, and discovering your blog. I WOULD like to hear more from editors and PR people about ides to control the glut of emails and misdirected press releases. I hope that other readers who might have some good ideas will share in a forum here.
I can speak from the side of a press release writer and the person tasked with the onerous job of trying to get those releases in the hands of the right people to review them.
I don’t have access (yet) to Bacon’s, so I generally resort to Googling the type of publication/industry I’m targeting and then trying to find the specific person who is in charge to press releases relevant to the topic. It would be great if publications would indicate specifically what topics they are interested in, and what they are NOT interested in. Perhaps I’m a dreamer, like John Lennon…
Anyway, being respectful of over-crammed in boxes, I usually try to ASK an initial contact who is the CORRECT person to direct an email/press release attachment to, and respect feedback and re-direct instructions. One recommendation I’ve heard that makes sense to include a very clear SUMMARY of the topic in the body of the email, and then attach the release as both a Word document and a PDF, though I’m not sure the use of the PDF…thoughts, anyone?
As any job seeker who’s sought the right fit through the internet, Quality trumps Quantity, and the more finely targeted a publication or regionally relevant the news is, the better. Finally, I’m sure I’m singing an old song, but management who insists everything is press worthy doesn’t help!
I’d love to hear constructive thoughts,
Ann Shea
-
Jul 23, 2008 PermalinkStop arguements with your flatmates with expensure | Indie Startups:
[...] * www.ryanblock.com/2007/10/pr-people-youre-not-blocked-but-do-your-homework/ [...]
-
Jun 24, 2009 PermalinkLost! » Blog Archive » Direct PR Is More Like Spam…:
[...] Applications?). One thing caught my eye – the learning experience that Marcus had when he found a PR posting that Ryan Block wrote. I’ve read it before, but not when I was having Ryan’s [...]
-
Jun 25, 2009 PermalinkPodtrapper developer on BlackBerry development, pricing and marketing | BlackBerry Cool:
[...] benefit themselves in knowing about my app (podcasters, tech bloggers, etc). Then I stumbled upon Ryan Block’s (of engadget fame) message to PR people (definitely worth a read). I realized these people probably get inundated with tons of crap like my “Hey you may be [...]
Leave a comment
Co-founder of gdgt. Critic of technology. Fighter of entropy. More here.
[...] Block of Engadget talks about how PR folks can better work with bloggers: “Let’s cut to the chase: yes, unfortunately most PR people don’t do their [...]