The extent of Mike Daisey’s lies

Sunday ~ March 18th, 2012 in Uncategorized | by Adam Ozimek

I get the sense that one reply to the Mike Daisey scandal is that “well, he may not have seen what he says he saw, but those things are happening and well documented”. But Daisey did not just take the reality conveyed in other accurate reporting and pretend that he saw it with his own eyes. No, because the stories he tells aren’t just made up, they also fail to characterize the situation correctly. You can see this importantly in how widespread and obvious he makes underage workers at Foxconn look. Here is how Daisey reported it in the monologue portion used in This American Life:

And I say to her, you seem kind of young. How old are you? And she says, I’m 13. And I say, 13? That’s young. Is it hard to get work at Foxconn when you’re– and she says oh no. And her friends all agree, they don’t really check ages. I’m telling you … in my first two hours of my first day at that gate, I met workers who were 14 years old, 13 years old, 12. Do you really think Apple doesn’t know?

This is not just a story about Daisey meeting underaged workers, but a claim about how easy it is to find them. And as you can see in the transcript from the retraction episode of TAL, Daisey’s claims are in contrast to what his translator says:

Rob Schmitz: Do you remember meeting 12 year-old, 13 year-old, and 14 year-old workers here?

Cathy Lee: No, I don’t think so. Maybe we met a girl who looked like she was 13 years old, like that one, she looks really young.

Rob Schmitz: Is that something that you would remember?

Cathy Lee: I think that if she said she was 13 or 12, then I would be surprised. I would be very surprised. And I would remember for sure. But there is no such thing.

Ira (narrarating): She’d be surprised, because she says in the ten years she’s visited factories in Shenzhen, she’s hardly ever seen underage workers.

As TAL reports, Apple has been aggressive about underage workers and they are rare:

In fact, underage workers are sometimes caught working at Apple suppliers.  Apple’s own audit says in 2010 when Daisey was in China, Apple found ten facilities where 91 underage workers were hired … but it’s widely acknowledged that Apple has been aggressive about underage workers, and they’re rare.  That’s 91 workers out of hundred of thousands.  Ira asked Mike about this on the This American Life broadcast, and he admitted it might be rare, but he stuck by his story

This is not consistent with anyone being able to walk up to Foxconn and within two hours be talking to underage workers. The story Daisey tells is one where Apple is negligent to an obvious and easily solved problem, whereas the facts TAL reports are of a company trying to stop underage workers and failing on relatively rare occasions. This kind of lie is not telling the story of the truth through a fictional narrative, but creating a fictional narrative that contradicts the bigger truth.

There are opposing narratives about the Apple, and Chinese labor and manufacturing. One sees the issue as black and white, simple, and easily solveable. Another sees it as a complex issue with no easy solutions, and that requires real tradeoffs. The former is how Mike Daisey tried to portray things, and the latter is how people like Adam Minter see it. In fact on an episode of On Point with Warren Olney, Adam Minter argues:

“….you’ve got a far more, far more complicated story than what is being presented in just the new york times and especially the This American Life Story”

In contrast, Mike Daisey appears on that same show and says “Lets stick a knife in this whole complicated thing for starters, because this isn’t actually that complicated”. That is the biggest fiction Mike Daisey was selling.

Share this:

  • StumbleUpon
  • Digg
  • Reddit
  • Facebook
  • LinkedIn
  • Twitter
  • More
    • Email
    • Print

    Like this:

    Like
    Be the first to like this post.

    Follow Modeled Behavior on Twitter

    • That tweet needed a link: Zuckerberg's 20,000 cows explained here t.co/REJ95VFi 16 minutes ago
    • Keep getting cow math wrong 17 minutes ago

    Recent Posts

    • Should people who want higher taxes donate to the government?
    • Can’t We All Get Along: Haidt and Gray, Edition
    • The Two Dogmas of Foodies
    • Daniel Kuehn on Secular Morality
    • Douthat on Secular Morality

    Categories

    • Babble
    • Bias and Rationality
    • Data Release
    • Economics
    • Event of the Century
    • Futurism
    • Global Warming
    • Health Care
    • Just Wow
    • Law
    • Modeled Behavior
    • obesity
    • politics
    • Regulation
    • Robots
    • Science
    • Society
    • Teaching
    • Uncategorized
    • Urbanism
    • World

    Archives

    • April 2012
    • March 2012
    • February 2012
    • January 2012
    • December 2011
    • November 2011
    • October 2011
    • September 2011
    • August 2011
    • July 2011
    • June 2011
    • May 2011
    • April 2011
    • March 2011
    • February 2011
    • January 2011
    • December 2010
    • November 2010
    • October 2010
    • September 2010
    • August 2010
    • July 2010
    • June 2010
    • May 2010
    • April 2010
    • March 2010
    • February 2010
    • January 2010
    • December 2009
    • November 2009
    • October 2009
    • September 2009
    • August 2009
    • July 2009
    • June 2009

    Tags

    Arnold Kling bias bubbles China demand economic growth economics education Fed Federal Federal Reserve gdp Growth health health care house prices housing illegal immigration immigration Inflation Kevin Drum Krugman labor economics labor markets markets Matt Yglesias minimum wage Monetary Monetary policy Money morality NGDP occupational licensing paternalism policy real estate economics Recession regulation Reserve science Taxes Tyler Cowen Unemployment unions Will Wilkinson
    NetworkedBlogs
    Blog:
    Modeled Behavior
    Topics:
    Economics, Politics, Rationality
     
    Follow my blog

    2 comments

    Comments feed for this article

    Sunday ~ March 18th, 2012 at 5:25 pm

    Jeff

    spacer

    This is a really incisive post. Two quotes capture the ideas here:

    “The story Daisey tells is one where Apple is negligent to an obvious and easily solved problem, whereas the facts TAL reports are of a company trying to stop underage workers and failing on relatively rare occasions.”

    Daisey wants to argue that his ‘theater’ is in service of a larger, emotional truth. However, the following sentence gets right to the flaw in that argument:

    “This kind of lie is not telling the story of the truth through a fictional narrative, but creating a fictional narrative that contradicts the bigger truth.”

    Daisey is a liar. It’s as black-&-white, and as simple as that.

    Reply

    Monday ~ March 19th, 2012 at 7:27 pm

    Daisey, Daisey… « Party and State

    [...] The extent of Mike Daisey’s lies (modeledbehavior.com) [...]

    Reply

    Leave a Reply Cancel reply

    Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

    spacer
    spacer

    You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. ( Log Out / Change )

    spacer

    You are commenting using your Twitter account. ( Log Out / Change )

    spacer

    You are commenting using your Facebook account. ( Log Out / Change )

    Cancel

    Connecting to %s

    gipoco.com is neither affiliated with the authors of this page nor responsible for its contents. This is a safe-cache copy of the original web site.