Beyond Budget-Cut Criminal Justice: The Future of Penal Law

Mary D. Fan American criminal justice is experiencing a perfect storm of budget-cut criminal justice reform and the awakening of courts to the role of checking penal severity.  A wave of reforms is sweeping the states as budgetary shortfalls are leading to measures once virtually impossible or very difficult to enact such as expanded early release, conversion of felonies to misdemeanors and scaling down sentences.  On the judicial front, the Supreme Court has… READ MORE

READ MORE | 90 N.C. L. Rev. 581 (2012)

Culture Clash: Special Education in Charter Schools

Robert A. Garda, Jr. Charter schools and special education for disabled students are based on conflicting education reforms and agency oversight principles. Charter schools operate in a culture of regulatory freedom and flexibility. They arose out of the modern era of accountability reform, in which student outcomes are the primary measure of school success and the driving engine of agency oversight. In stark contrast, special education laws were conceived in the civil rights era… READ MORE

READ MORE | 90 N.C. L. Rev. 655 (2012)

The Earned Income Tax Credit and the Administration of Tax Expenditures

Jonathan S. Schneller The field of tax expenditure analysis has generally assumed a binary choice between tax expenditures and direct outlays. Because tax expenditures have multiple traits that are said to render them a suboptimal spending mechanism, scholars have tended to argue that they should be eliminated outright, or that they should be recast as direct expenditures. But despite such arguments, tax expenditures have proven to be a resilient (and politically popular) part… READ MORE

READ MORE | 90 N.C. L. Rev. 719 (2012)

Flag on the Play: The Ineffectiveness of Athlete-Agent Laws and Regulations — and How North Carolina Can Take Advantage of a Scandal To Be a Model for Reform

Timothy G. Nelson In January 2010, fans of the University of North Carolina’s (“UNC”) football program received unexpected, fantastic news. Star defensive tackle Marvin Austin announced on his Twitter account that he planned to return to Chapel Hill for his senior season, rather than—as many predicted he would—forego his final year of collegiate eligibility for the fame and fortune of the National Football League (“NFL”): “I will be a Tar Heel for 2010!… READ MORE

READ MORE | 90 N.C. L. Rev. 800 (2012)

Unwarranted Discrepancies in the Advancement of Animal Law: The Growing Disparity in Protection Between Companion Animals and Agricultural Animals

Elizabeth Ann Overcash In August of 2009, Lashawn Whitehead was at home with his baby, his mother, and his girlfriend’s three-month-old puppy, Susie. Susie, a German shepherd-pit bull mix, jumped onto the couch where Whitehead’s baby was resting. According to Whitehead’s mother, when Susie jumped onto the couch, Whitehead became enraged. He grabbed Susie by the fur, took her outside, and dripped lighter fluid over her. Whitehead then held her down and beat her for about fifteen… READ MORE

READ MORE | 90 N.C. L. Rev. 837 (2012)

The “Substantial Uncertainty” of the Viability of Woodson Claims After Valenzuela v. Pallet Express, Inc.

Leah D'Aurora Richardson Two decades ago, the Supreme Court of North Carolina, compelled to discourage egregious employer misconduct, carved out an important exception to the exclusive remedy provision of the North Carolina Workers’ Compensation Act (the “Act”) which generally limits an employee’s recovery for work-related injuries and precludes common law remedies. A claim based on this exception, commonly called a Woodson claim, is a cause of action for employees’ injuries resulting from an employer’s intentional… READ MORE

READ MORE | 90 N.C. L. Rev. 884 (2012)

The Dark Side of Unattributed Copying and the Ethical Implications of Plagiarism in the Legal Profession

Cooper J. Strickland Plagiarism is an intriguing subject. Though support for this statement is not likely needed—it is undoubtedly common knowledge—a simple example puts this widely accepted opinion into context. In 1988, during the Democratic Party’s campaign for the presidential nomination, one of the candidates made the following statement in a speech before a gathering of the California Democratic Party: “ ‘Few of us have the greatness to bend history itself. But each… READ MORE

READ MORE | 90 N.C. L. Rev. 920 (2012)
Addendum

Parenthood by Estoppel? Assessing Boseman v. Jarrell and North Carolina’s Child Custody Standard

Andrew D. Brown While North Carolina’s legal standards in the area of parental rights are generally consistent with the standards set forth by federal constitutional jurisprudence, the Supreme Court of North Carolina’s most recent venture into child custody analysis demonstrates that the state’s custody standard has gradually deviated in a subtle, yet significant way from federal constitutional requirements. In Boseman, the court effectively terminated the parental rights of a fit, legal parent by granting… READ MORE

90 N.C. L. Rev. Addendum Addendum 180 (2012)

Cybercrime in the Securities Market: Is U.C.C. Article 8 Prepared?

Christina Parajon Skinner Today, over ninety percent of stock trades are done electronically through financial institutions, exchanges, and brokerage houses. Paper transactions—effectuated by the transfer of a physical stock certificate—are rare and, for that matter, outdated. And as a result of industry efforts to phase out the stock certificate, many investors today can no longer reify their stock ownership with a paper certificate. Yet despite attempts to modernize the commercial law governing investment securities to account… READ MORE

90 N.C. L. Rev. Addendum Addendum 132 (2012)

A Better Balancing: Reconsidering Pre-Conviction DNA Extraction from Federal Arrestees

Kevin Lapp & Joy Radice In a 2004 en banc decision, the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals upheld as reasonable under the Fourth Amendment the congressionally mandated extraction of DNA from certain federal offenders who were on parole, probation, or supervised release in United States v. Kincade. This reversed the panel opinion, marking the first time a federal court had permitted compulsory DNA extraction from non-incarcerated federal offenders. In dissent, Judge Reinhardt predicted that the majority’s… READ MORE

90 N.C. L. Rev. Addendum Addendum 157 (2012)

News

  • Announcing the Volume 91 Board!
  • 2011 Symposium Video Available
  • Volume 90, Issue 1 Available
  • Volume 90 Masthead
  • New Fall Addendum Articles Published

Forthcoming

  • The Not-So-Extraordinary Case of Aikens v. Ingram: Rule 60(B)(6) Relief from Final Judgments in the Fourth Circuit
  • Frederick Johnson
  • The Federal Arbitration Act and Testamentary Instruments
  • David Horton
  • Clearly Established Enough: The Fourth Circuit’s New Approach to Qualified Immunity in Bellotte v. Edwards
  • Daniel K. Siegel
  • United States v. Rodriguez and Carachuri-Rosendo v. Holder: Shedding Light on the Maximum Potential Term Issue in United States v. Simmons
  • Christopher R. Detwiler
  • Refusing To Compare Apples and Oranges: Why the Fourth Circuit Got It Right in United States v. Divens
  • Tziporah Schwartz Tapp
  • Judging-Lite: How Arbitrators Use and Create Precedent
  • W. Mark C. Weidemaier
  • The Jurisdictional “Haze”: An Examination of Tribal Court Contempt Powers Over Non-Indians
  • Joseph Chilton
  • The Geography of Sexuality
  • Yishai Blank & Issi Rosen-Zvi
Subscribe to the North Carolina Law Review
gipoco.com is neither affiliated with the authors of this page nor responsible for its contents. This is a safe-cache copy of the original web site.