Washington Report on Middle East Affairs, April 2004, pages
32-33
Special Report
Breaching Another Barrier for PalestineThis One in
the U.S. Peace Movement
By Sara Powell
|
|
Leslie Cagan of United
for Peace and Justice (l), and Elias Rashmawi of FPA and ANSWER,
author of the Arab- and Muslim-American community’s“open
letter” to the anti-war movement (staff photos S. Powell). |
|
|
AS MANY ADVOCATES for Palestinian justice are aware, U.S. activists
to the left of center have failed to really push the issue to the
forefront of the peace movement. Literally for decades, in fact,
activists concerned for Palestinian rights have been consistently
marginalized by their peers. From the shameful refusal of anti-nuclear
activists to address what was happening in Sabra and Shatila at
their million-strong rally in New York City in June 1982, to the
two demonstrations held April 20, 2002 in Washington, DCone the
largest demonstration for Palestinian rights ever in the U.S., the
other a smaller anti-war demonstrationthe organizers of which initially
declined to participate in a unified march and rally to include
the Palestinian issue. The latter group eventually merged with the
larger march against Israeli Prime Minister Ariel Sharons vicious
assault on the West Bank. Through the decades, however, leading
American activists have tried to keep Palestinian voicesand the
voices of those supporting themfrom being heard.
The post-9/11 U.S. war on Afghanistan, and especially the pre-emptive
war on Iraq, led to a renaissance of the peace movement in this
countrybringing hundreds of thousands of Americans from all walks
of life into the streets, time and again, to challenge U.S. Middle
East policy. Two large coalitionsInternational ANSWER (Act Now
to Stop War and End Racism) and UFPJ (United for Peace and Justice)took
center stage as organizers of the movement. Those who demonstrated
heard a variety of messages about colonial domination around the
world, the need for equality and justice at home, and the misuse
of funds for warfare when so many of their fellow citizens are hungry
and homeless. The protestors even heard something about the Israeli
occupation of Palestine with U.S. funds, arms, and diplomatic protection.
On Oct 25, 2003, ANSWER and UFPJ cosponsored a large demonstration
in Washington, DC demanding to Bring the troops home now. Early
last November, ANSWER issued a public call for a March 20 protestto
be held on the first anniversary of the U.S. invasion of Iraq. Soon
after, UFPJ followed suit. Both formed coalitions with other like-minded
groups, and applied for permitsthe work of organizing was underway.
By early December ANSWER had approached UFPJ with a proposal for
a unified demonstration, and by January an extensive, somewhat detailed,
proposition was on the table.
Along with the Palestine Right to Return Coalition (Al Awda),
the Muslim Students Association (MSA), the Free Palestine Alliance-USA
(FPA), the Muslim American Society, Freedom Foundation (MAS), the
National Lawyers Guild (NLG) and the Arab Muslim American Federation,
ANSWER called for the March 20 mobilization to protest all colonial
occupationsspecifically including Palestine.
On Jan. 12, the Arab- and Muslim-American community issued an
open letter to the anti-war movement. Among the letters main points
were that the struggle in Palestine was central to any peace and
justice mobilization, that the rights of return and self-determination
are key anchors of the Palestinian struggle, and that the decades-long
marginalization and tokenization of Arab and Muslim voices is racist
and unacceptable. Justice is neither selective, nor partial or
conditional, the letter concluded.
To date almost 300 organizations, as well as many individuals,
have signed the letter. Among the signatories are 10 Palestinian
refugee camp institutionsincluding The Forum of Palestinian NGOs
Working on Refugee Camps of Lebanon (an umbrella group of 18 non-governmental
organizations), The Palestinian NGO Network of 92 Palestinian NGOs
based in Palestine, and the Right of Return Congress Internationaland
four South African solidarity groups, including the Anti-War Coalition
South Africa, which comprises 70 organizations. (For a complete
list of signers see the ANSWER Web site, <www.internationalanswer.org>).
Immediately, UFPJ and the other members of its coalition, the
March 20 Mobilizing Committee, attempted to reshape the program.
Once again, American activists split over the issue of Palestine.
This time, however, the March 20 National Coalition, which included
ANSWER, Al Awda, MSA, FPA and others, drew a line in the sand and
refused to compromise or back down from their insistence that Palestine
be a major focus of the demonstration.
In the past, other political differences within and between the
various coalitions had proven secondary to the pressing issues of
war. The issue of Palestinian rights, however, always had crumbled
in the face of supporters of Israelfrom hard-line Zionists to sympathizers
with Holocaust victimsall apparently unable to acknowledge the
injustice perpetrated on the people of Palestine. As ANSWER had
stood with Arab and Muslim Americans in April 2002, however, so
it was determined to do again on March 20.
Throughout the country, heated meetings took place between the
various groups. Al Awdas Dr. Jess Ghannam, of the University of
San Francisco, said that one UFPJ leader, reportedly from Tikkun,
told him personally that the group was worried about a Palestinian
taking the stage to discuss the Right of Return. The peculiar tendency
to embrace all other just causes while pretending (at best) that
Palestinians do not exist, or blaming Palestine for its occupationor
even vilifying Palestinians as evil terrorists who have no right
to the land they have lived on and cultivated for centurieswas
exposed as lying deep within groups whose raison detre ostensibly
was peace and justice.
During one conference call seeking to create a unified demonstration,
the March 20 Mobilizing Committee tried to change the focus of the
march while still allowing Palestinians to speak. At the conclusion
of the call, according to sources, those representing the March
20 National Coalition stated, one by one, that they would not compromise
on the demand to include Palestine as an integral focus.
Finally, on Feb. 6, after many tense negotiations, the Mobilizing
Committee agreed on Feb. 6 to issue a joint statement with the National
Coalition. The call went out for a united demonstration in New York
City, to march for an end to the occupation and corporate control
of Iraq and to bring the troops home now [and to]...march for an
end to the occupation of Palestine...
On Feb. 7, ANSWER issued the call on behalf of the National Coalition;
several days later, UFPJ issued the call on behalf of the Committee.
However, U.S. Labor Against the War (USLAW), Bring the Troops Home
Nowa coalition of Military Families Against the War, and Veterans
for Peace no longer are listed on the UFPJ Web page as being among
the members of the March 20 Mobilizing Committee. UFPJs San Francisco
chapter, moreover, declined to be part of the Bay Area demonstration.
In contrast, New York City Labor Against the War (NYCLAW) fought
for the inclusion of Palestine.
Nonetheless, it does seem that the Palestinian cause might be
on its way to achieving political correctness among U.S. activists.
One hopes that, as a result, Americans realization of Palestinians
legitimate demands will spread more quickly among those who profess
to stand for justice.
Sara Powell is the Washington Reports administrative
and public relations director. |