CCSD Superintendent Dwight Jones warned that an unelected, unaccountable arbitrator from California rewarding the Clark County Education Association's stall tactics would lead to 1,000 pink slips, and here they are. Via the Las Vegas Review-Journal:
This led to a couple of unintentional hilarious tweets from the Nevada State Education Association, including this one.
This is funny, because emphasizing the number of layoffs and ignoring vacancies and unfilled positions mitigating those layoffs is exactly what union bosses do during legislative sessions to ratchet up pressure for increasing education funding.
Also, NSEA has just said or at least implied that reducing 1,015 positions is a scare tactic, even though eliminating 1,015 positions means larger class sizes! The implication being that NSEA thinks there's no reason to be scared of larger class sizes.
And on this, NSEA would be right — even though I don't think that's what the NSEA union bosses intended — because eliminating CCSD's 1,015 worst teachers would be a boon to student achievement.
Why?
Because a teacher is the most important school-controlled factor in student achievement. Students with an excellent teacher learn 18 months of material in one year; students with an ineffective teacher learn 6 months of material in one year. Some people want "smaller classes," but the most important school-controlled factor in student learning is teacher quality, not class size.
Unfortunately, CCEA union bosses prevented this from happening, because they ensured that after 32 teachers were laid off for disciplinary reasons, layoffs will occur based on seniority.
So CCSD's seven best new teachers will be rewarded with pink slips, students will lose two to four months worth of learning next year and the dance of the lemons will continue. All because union bosses succeeded in protecting ineffective teachers that harm the learning of your children.
If you like this system, thank the union bosses at the NSEA and CCEA.
If you want a better system, the need to eliminate or, at least, seriously reform collective bargaining for public-sector unions and to offer school choice for all parents has never been clearer.
Class sizes will increase and more than 1,000 teachers will be laid off if the Clark County School Board adopts its proposed budget tonight.Now, as Agenda co-host Elizabeth Crum noted today when I was a guest on her show, 1,015 layoffs doesn't mean that those 1,015 employees won't have a job in CCSD next year. Pink slips will be given to 1,015 CCSD workers, but after teachers retire or leave, some or all of those teachers will be hired back, although there will be 1,015 fewer positions next year.
The School District must cut $60 million in spending. Officials had planned on saving that money by freezing teacher pay. But the Clark County Education Association, the teacher's union, fought that plan. An arbitrator ruled in the union's favor.
As a result, according to a memo sent out Wednesday, 1,015 teacher positions will be eliminated. This will result in classes increasing by about two or three students each.
This led to a couple of unintentional hilarious tweets from the Nevada State Education Association, including this one.
This is funny, because emphasizing the number of layoffs and ignoring vacancies and unfilled positions mitigating those layoffs is exactly what union bosses do during legislative sessions to ratchet up pressure for increasing education funding.
Also, NSEA has just said or at least implied that reducing 1,015 positions is a scare tactic, even though eliminating 1,015 positions means larger class sizes! The implication being that NSEA thinks there's no reason to be scared of larger class sizes.
And on this, NSEA would be right — even though I don't think that's what the NSEA union bosses intended — because eliminating CCSD's 1,015 worst teachers would be a boon to student achievement.
Why?
Because a teacher is the most important school-controlled factor in student achievement. Students with an excellent teacher learn 18 months of material in one year; students with an ineffective teacher learn 6 months of material in one year. Some people want "smaller classes," but the most important school-controlled factor in student learning is teacher quality, not class size.
Unfortunately, CCEA union bosses prevented this from happening, because they ensured that after 32 teachers were laid off for disciplinary reasons, layoffs will occur based on seniority.
So CCSD's seven best new teachers will be rewarded with pink slips, students will lose two to four months worth of learning next year and the dance of the lemons will continue. All because union bosses succeeded in protecting ineffective teachers that harm the learning of your children.
If you like this system, thank the union bosses at the NSEA and CCEA.
If you want a better system, the need to eliminate or, at least, seriously reform collective bargaining for public-sector unions and to offer school choice for all parents has never been clearer.
1 comments:
I spoke with a friend of mine the other day whose daughter is in sixth grade and she used to absolutely love school and make good grades until she got her current teacher whom, he says, basically yells at the students all day. He has witnessed this, the principal has witnessed this, and this lady has been a teacher for over 20 years. He was told that the only solution is for his daughter to switch classes. She went from loving school to faking sick so she would not have to go to school and the best that can be done, even though everyone knows this woman behaves poorly as a teacher, is a move of the young girl. What about all of the other students? What about all of the kids that have already passed through this torture seat? It has become clear to me that when layoffs occur based on seniority, they only thing that happens is that the excited, fresh-eyed teachers get sent away, and we lose an opportunity to revitalize the spirit of learning in our kids.
What do you think a solution to this would be? How can we make it so that teachers are retained based solely on performance (and not grade-based performance?) and is it true that even when a teacher gets removed for bad behavior, they are still paid?
Post a Comment