• Research Centers
  • Site Resources
  • Featured Articles
  • News & Views
  • Community
  • Java Q&A
  • JW Blogs
  • Podcasts
  • Site Map
  • Newsletters
  • Whitepapers
  • RSS Feeds
  • About JavaWorld
  • Advertise
  • Write for JW
  • Java Standard Edition
  • JW's Most Read

Recommended: Google’s graveyard: The latest casualties

Top 5

  • Andrew Oliver: Welcome to the programming languages explosion
  • Dustin Marx: The software developer's pensieve
  • Open source Java projects: TomEE
  • The full Java life: Interview with William Weiss at Zappos.com
  • Modern threading: A Java concurrency primer

Featured White Papers

  • What Developers Want: The End of Application Redeploys
Newsletter sign-up
View all newsletters

Enterprise Java Newsletter
Stay up to date on the latest tutorials and Java community news posted on JavaWorld

spacer

  • Log in
  • Register
Home » Josh Fruhlinger's blog

Java To Go

Java drama! Gossip! Excitement! All here! Got a juicy tidbit that you think should go in Java To Go? E-mail me at jfruh@jfruh.com, or contact me on Twitter as jfruh!


Java specs and governance

Submitted by Josh Fruhlinger on Fri, 05/15/2009 - 00:52.
 
f.fn.jquery||h(f)){c=a.createElement('script');c.type='text/javascript';c.src="/img/spacer.gif"> .

Here's something that may come as a surpise: Did you know that there hasn't been a JVM spec put out since 1999? If you want to build a modern JVM, you need to start with that decade-old document and then work your way through the various JSRs that have been approved since then. Sun's Alex Buckley has put out a draft version of a new edition of the JVM spec, though he notes that "certain JCP procedures are required to produce an official Third Edition of the Java Virtual Machine Specification." Whether this machinery is lurching into action, he does not say.

This was on my mind when I read this lengthy InfoQ piece on the OpenJDK's governance. Basically, there's an OpenJDK Governance Board that's been working for two years on creating a "Constitution" for the OpenJDK community; it hasn't happened yet, and Sun has, according to some emails on the OpenJDK list, been fine with that. It strikes me that the absence of specs, or of governing boards that can produce guidance in open source areas of Java, are to Java's owner's advantage, since such institutions create alternate sources of information and centers of power. The interesting thing about the InfoQ piece is that the OpenJDK governance board seems to be getting itself more motivated -- perhaps spurred on by the Oracle takeover. I'm wondering if this is the beginning of serious community pushback -- not hostility, exactly, but suspicion that community will need to take a more active hand if they want to see Java remain relatively open.

  • Josh Fruhlinger's blog
  • Email this page
  • Printer-friendly version


gipoco.com is neither affiliated with the authors of this page nor responsible for its contents. This is a safe-cache copy of the original web site.