Skip to posts

Advocacy For Animals

  • Home
  • About Us
  • Comment Policy
  • Contact Us

Browsing Posts in Legal Issues

A Man, a Dog, and a Lawless 12-Hour Journey

July 20, 2012 No comments

by Liza Franzetta

Our thanks to the Animal Legal Defense Fund (ALDF) for permission to republish this post, which originally appeared on the ALDF Blog on July 13, 2012. Franzetta is the ALDF’s Director of Communications.

Dog lovers across the political spectrum have been barking mad all election season over the now-infamous tale of Mitt Romney’s family road trip with his Irish Setter, Seamus, strapped to the roof of his car. The Animal Legal Defense Fund’s new infographic about Mitt’s very own “Crate-Gate” depicts not only the down-and-dirty details of Seamus’ terrifying 12 hour trip—it outlines the anti-cruelty laws in each of the jurisdictions the Romneys passed through that would clearly prohibit such a rooftop journey. As Lanny Davis wrote for Fox News, “This is the ultimate Purple Issue — it cuts across Republicans, Democrats, blue states, red states, liberals and conservatives.”

Thanks to our friends at Datagram Design for creating this infographic!

spacer spacer spacer continue reading…

Legal Issues, Partner Blogs, Pets and Companions, Posts Animal cruelty, Crate-Gate, Dogs, Mitt Romney
Read more

Action Alerts from the National Anti-Vivisection Society

July 19, 2012 Comments off

spacer

Each week the National Anti-Vivisection Society (NAVS) sends out an e-mail alert called “Take Action Thursday,” which tells subscribers about current actions they can take to help animals. NAVS is a national, not-for-profit educational organization incorporated in the State of Illinois. NAVS promotes greater compassion, respect, and justice for animals through educational programs based on respected ethical and scientific theory and supported by extensive documentation of the cruelty and waste of vivisection. You can register to receive these action alerts and more at the NAVS Web site.

This week’s Take Action Thursday reviews bills concerning animals and the military, as well as a novel Rhode Island law allowing animals to have their own advocates in court. continue reading…

Advocates for Animals, Legal Issues, Posts Animal advocacy, Lawyers, Veterans
Read more

Phony Front Groups the Only Chickens in Hen Debate

July 18, 2012 No comments

by Michael Markarian, president of the Humane Society Legislative Fund

Our thanks to the HSLF Animals & Politics blog for permission to republish this post, which first appeared on their site on July 13, 2012.

It’s not uncommon for Washington lobbying groups to set up phony organizations that sound like they are advocating in the public interest, rather than for corporate special interests. spacer Now there’s a new group inside the beltway with the altruistic sounding name “Keep Food Affordable,” set up by the pork industry to attack members of Congress who are backing legislation to improve the treatment of egg-laying hens and provide a stable and secure future for U.S. egg farmers.

So who is this shadowy front group? In this interview, videotaped this summer at the World Pork Expo in Des Moines, a board member of the National Pork Producers Council (NPPC) said “it’s funded mainly by NPPC.” And why would the pork producers care about legislation that only deals with laying hens, when they have no involvement in egg production, processing, or sales? Because they have among the worst records on animal welfare—with many large, industrialized operations confining sows in small cages, and producing enormous volumes of waste that pollute the environment. In fact, just this week, The Humane Society of the United States served notices to 51 pig confinement operations in the top pork-producing states for unreported releases of the hazardous pollutant ammonia.

The actual stakeholders involved in egg industry issues agree that Congress should pass S. 3239 and H.R. 3798, the Egg Products Inspection Act Amendments of 2012. This legislation has the backing of animal welfare groups, the egg industry, veterinary groups, and consumer groups. continue reading…

Advocates for Animals, Food and Farm Animals, Legal Issues, Posts Eggs, Front groups, Hens, National Pork Producers
Read more

Action Alerts from the National Anti-Vivisection Society

July 12, 2012 Comments off

spacer
Each week the National Anti-Vivisection Society (NAVS) sends out an e-mail alert called “Take Action Thursday,” which tells subscribers about current actions they can take to help animals. NAVS is a national, not-for-profit educational organization incorporated in the State of Illinois. NAVS promotes greater compassion, respect, and justice for animals through educational programs based on respected ethical and scientific theory and supported by extensive documentation of the cruelty and waste of vivisection. You can register to receive these action alerts and more at the NAVS Web site.

This week’s Take Action Thursday takes a look at chimpanzees used in research, better protection for companion animals in retail pet stores and puppy mills, and the role of science in federal agency rulemaking. continue reading…

Legal Issues, Posts none
Read more

Love and Despair

July 11, 2012 No comments

by Nicole Pallotta

Our thanks to the Animal Legal Defense Fund (ALDF) for permission to republish this post, which originally appeared on the ALDF Blog on July 9, 2012. Pallotta is the ALDF’s Animal Law Program Student Liason.

Can we realistically expect judges to render trail-blazing pro-animal decisions in the afternoon when they dined on animals’ flesh in the morning?

So asks ALDF senior attorney Matthew Liebman in an article recently published in the Animal Law Review.

spacer

Teagan---courtesy ALDF Blog.

“Who the Judge Ate for Breakfast: On the Limits of Creativity in Animal Law and the Redeeming Power of Powerlessness” applies a legal realist and critical legal studies perspective to the question of how far litigation can take us on behalf of animals; more specifically, Matthew addresses the limits of creativity in the courtroom. Creativity is essential given the profound substantive and procedural hurdles to protecting animals through litigation; because of these obstacles, animal protection lawyers must “search for new and innovative interpretations of existing statutes and precedent to promote the interests of animals.” This strategy has worked in a number of instances, and ALDF (and the animal protection movement more broadly) has won legal victories for animals. While recognizing and lauding these successes, Matthew cautions:

We have to recognize that the success of our creativity hinges on forces beyond ourselves and beyond our control… Adjudication is not done in an academic vacuum by unbiased arbiters, but rather by human beings, by judges reared on the ideologies of a legal system, and a society, that is profoundly speciesist … Judicial interpretation is never an objective deduction of plain meaning or congressional intent, but rather the interplay of normative judgments, biases, and subjective values.

continue reading…

Advocates for Animals, Animal Experimentation, Animals as Commodities, Food and Farm Animals, Legal Issues, Partner Blogs, Posts none
Read more
  1. Page 1 of 69
  2. 1
  3. 2
  4. 3
  5. ...
  6. 69
  7. Next Page
spacer

Browse by Date

July 2012
S M T W T F S
« Jun    
1234567
891011121314
15161718192021
22232425262728
293031  

Archives

  • 2012
    • January
    • February
    • March
    • April
    • May
    • June
    • July
  • 2011
    • January
    • February
    • March
    • April
    • May
    • June
    • July
    • August
    • September
    • October
    • November
    • December
  • 2010
    • January
    • February
    • March
    • April
    • May
    • June
    • July
    • August
    • September
    • October
    • November
    • December
  • 2009
    • January
    • February
    • March
    • April
    • May
    • June
    • July
    • August
    • September
    • October
    • November
    • December
  • 2008
    • January
    • February
    • March
    • April
    • May
    • June
    • July
    • August
    • September
    • October
    • November
    • December
  • 2007
    • January
    • February
    • March
    • April
    • May
    • June
    • July
    • August
    • September
    • October
    • November
    • December
  • 2006
    • November
    • December

Who Am I?

    spacer
    See the answer

Categories

  • Advocates for Animals
  • Animal Experimentation
  • Animal Rights
  • Animals as Commodities
  • Animals in Art and Entertainment
  • Animals in the News
  • Environment and Habitat
  • Food and Farm Animals
  • Hunting, Fishing, and Trapping
  • Legal Issues
  • Mental, Emotional, and Social Life
  • Organizations
  • Pets and Companions
  • Religion and Animals
  • Threatened and Endangered Animals
  • Working Animals
  • Zoos and Captivity

In the News

  • Antigua and Barbuda ignores protests, backs whaling again: The Antigua & Barbuda government has defended its membership in the International Whaling Commission (IWC) and has again backed the Japanese commercial whaling bid.
  • Australia mulls end to ban on great white shark fishing after surfer killed: The brutal mauling of a 24-year-old surfer in the waters off Western Australia over the weekend has local officials pondering an end to a ban on killing great whites.
  • Thousands of turtle eggs destroyed in excavation: Conservationists are blaming the government of Trinidad and Tobago for the loss of as many as 20,000 leatherback turtle eggs after excavation crews overran a beach long considered one of the endangered species’ most important nesting grounds.
  • South Korea says it may scrap plan to conduct research whaling: South Korea says it may scrap research whaling plans that have been widely criticized. Fisheries official Kang Joon-suk said Wednesday that Seoul may drop the plans if it finds ways to study whales without killing them.
  • South Korea to follow Japan and start 'scientific' whaling: South Korea plans to start whaling through a loophole that allows the killing of whales for scientific research.

Recent Comments

  • U.S. Senate Passes Animal Fighting Amendment (6)
    • PETA -- Phonies in the Enterprise of Terrorizing Americans: I commend Sen. Sessions of Alabama, Sen. Rubio of Florida, Sen. Paul of...
    • PETA -- Phonies in the Enterprise of Terrorizing Americans: Correct. Some religions — such as Orthodox Judaism — prohibit the...
    • Administrator: The Free Exercise clause applies to religion.
    • PETA -- Phonies in the Enterprise of Terrorizing Americans: That would be a violation of the First Amendment’s Free Exercise clause.