spacer
  • Hardware News
  • Forums
  • Discussions
  • Links

spacer
  • Home
  • CPU
  • Mainboards
  • Memory
  • Graphics
  • Storage
  • Multimedia
  • Cooling
  • Cases/PSU
  • Monitors
  • Networking
  • Mobile
  • Other
  • Search
  • Newsletter
  • Services
  • RSS
  • PDA | Mobile

Real-time Pricing and Availability:
XFX FX-787A-CNFC Radeon HD 7870 Core Edition Video Card 2048MB GDDR5 PCI-Express 3.0 x16 2x DVI Mini DisplayPort 1x HDMI DirectX 11 Dual-Slot CrossFireX Eyefinity Buy is your one source for the best
  • spacer - $244.99
  • spacer - $249.99
  • spacer - $299.99
  • spacer - $244.99

  • Top Stories
  • Commented
  • Featured
  • Kepler for the Masses: Nvidia GeForce GTX 660 Ti from Zotac Review
  • PowerColor Unleashes the Devil: World's First Dual-GPU Radeon HD 7990 Graphics Card Launched
  • True GeForce GTX 680: MSI N680GTX Lightning 2 GB Graphics Card Review
  • OCZ Agility 4 Solid State Drives: 128 GB and 256 GB Models Reviewed
  • IBM to Takeover Designer of High-Performance Solid-State Storage Solutions
Articles: Graphics
spacer  

spacer

(39) 
spacer

2 Fast, 2 Furious: ATI Radeon X1900 XT CrossFire Review

[02/26/2006 05:17 PM | Graphics]
by Alexey Stepin , Anton Shilov

The Radeon X1900 XTX – the fast and the furious – is currently among the fastest graphics cards for consumers available. But sometimes even more speed is desired for unbelievable quality and realism. Introducing the review of the too fast and too furious tandem of two Radeon X1900-series graphics cards: the 96 pixel shader processors show themselves in all their glory in 21 benchmarks.

Table of Contents

  • The Power of 96 Pixel Shader Processors
  • ATI CrossFire: The Third Incarnation
  • Testbed and Methods
  • Performance in First-Person 3D Shooters
    • Battlefield 2
    • The Chronicles of Riddick
    • Call of Duty 2
    • Doom 3
    • Far Cry
    • F.E.A.R.
    • Half-Life 2
    • Half-Life 2: Lost Coast
    • Project: Snowblind
    • Quake 4
    • Serious Sam 2
    • Unreal Tournament 2004
  • Performance in Third-Person 3D Shooters
    • Splinter Cell: Chaos Theory
  • Performance in Simulators
    • Colin McRae Rally 2005
    • Pacific Fighters
  • Performance in Strategy Games
    • Age of Empires 3
    • Warhammer 40000: Dawn of War
  • Performance in Semi-Synthetic Benchmarks
    • Aquamark3
  • Performance in Synthetic Benchmarks
    • Futuremark 3DMark03
    • Futuremark 3DMark05
    • Futuremark 3DMark06
  • Conclusion
Pages: [ 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 | 12 | 13 | 14 | 15 | 16 | 17 | 18 | 19 | 20 | 21 | 22 ]

Multi-GPU technologies, including the mature scalable link interface (SLI) from Nvidia Corp. and CrossFire technology from ATI that only begins to gain market acceptance, are intended for relatively small group of enthusiasts who desire tomorrow’s performance today. The enthusiasm towards high-peformance multi-GPU systems is akin to interest in luxurious sports cars: hundreads dream of Ferraris, but end up with Fiats.

Graphics chip companies present multi-GPU technologies as a way to get next-generation speed out of the currently existing hardware and as an option of upgrading later without need to get rid of the current graphics card. Both theories have a right to exist, but you should remember that future graphics cards will bring in a new feature-set; while in case you won’t sell your graphics board tomorrow, but install a similar one, you’ll need to sell already two boards the day after tomorrow.

Indeed, multi-GPU is generally needed for high-end computers, in fact, they do bring a lot of benefits for their owners: ability to play in high resolutions, ability to enable more advanced full-screen anti-aliasing methods compared to single-GPU setups, generally higher speed and some others. Keeping in mind both these advantages as well as somewhat debatable ritorics of graphics chip suppliers, it is clear that there is a need for ultra high end ьber-performance graphics solutions for those who demand it at any cost.

For about a year Nvidia’s SLI was the only option for those who would to have the highest speed: the Radeon X850 CrossFire arrived too late and was still slower compared to Nvidia’s offerings, the Radeon X1800 CrossFire arrived just weeks before the Radeon X1900 and also had some performance issues when compared to the highest-end dual-GeForce 7800-series setups. Today we try to find out whether two of the Radeon X1900 XT graphics cards deliver the unbeatable performance and really represent a too fast and too furious tandem.

spacer

 
Next Page >
Pages: [ 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 | 12 | 13 | 14 | 15 | 16 | 17 | 18 | 19 | 20 | 21 | 22 ]
Tweet

Discussion

Comments currently: 39
Discussion started: 02/27/06 12:12:25 AM
Latest comment: 08/25/06 07:37:05 AM

View comments

Add your Comment

[Login] [Forgot password?] [Registration]




Our Sponsors

spacer spacer
  • Contacts
  • Advertising
  • About us
  • Terms & Conditions
spacer
gipoco.com is neither affiliated with the authors of this page nor responsible for its contents. This is a safe-cache copy of the original web site.