Will FCoE architecture replace Fibre Channel?

Carrie Higbie, Network Infrastructure expert
  • E-mail
  • Print
  • A
  • AA
  • AAA
  • LinkedIn
  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • Share This
  • RSS
  • Reprints

Do you think the Fibre Channel over Ethernet (FCoE) protocol will replace Fibre Channel any time soon?

    Requires Free Membership to View

    Login

    By submitting your registration information to SearchNetworking.com you agree to receive email communications from TechTarget and TechTarget partners. We encourage you to read our Privacy Policy which contains important disclosures about how we collect and use your registration and other information. If you reside outside of the United States, by submitting this registration information you consent to having your personal data transferred to and processed in the United States. Your use of SearchNetworking.com is governed by our Terms of Use. You may contact us at webmaster@TechTarget.com.

spacer

Do you have a question for our experts?

Submit your question directly to our editors at editor@searchnetworking.com

FCoE architecture will not replace Fibre Channel anytime soon, in my opinion. Fibre Channel over Ethernet shipped under 2 million ports in 2012, according to a study I recently read, while Fibre Channel shipped over 4.5 billion. Fibre Channel is familiar and works like a champ. It is a very low-overhead protocol, whereas with FCoE, you are forced to rely on a high-overhead Ethernet packet. Fibre Channel now ships 16 Gbps and the Ethernet counterpart, at least today, is stuck at 10.

Read more about FCoE architecture

FCoE network convergence will start at the edge but move to the rack

End-to-end FCoE for network convergence won't work!

What's more, while they say Ethernet saves on the number of ports, cables, etc., the last time I checked, the power required for the converged adapter was higher than separate Fibre Channel and Ethernet ports. Cables typically carry a 90-day warranty as opposed to a 20-year warranty that you would get with a structured cabling system. Reducing the number of switches required (which is very easy with 10GBASE-T) also reduces the number of required uplink ports.

I'm not saying FCoE architecture will never be used, but that the hype is just that -- hype.

More News and Tutorials

  • Articles

    • Fibre Channel over Ethernet (FCoE) implementation
    • FCoE: Is your data storage infrastructure ready?
    • Opinion: advantages of fibre channel over Ethernet
    • FCoE storage: Fibre Channel over Ethernet explained
    • Cisco expands Fibre Channel over Ethernet support; adds multihop FCoE

    • Fibre Channel over Ethernet Special Report for enterprise data storage professionals
    • Cisco, NetApp and VMware combine for 'end-to-end' FCoE storage
    • FCoE (Fibre Channel over Ethernet)
    • Cisco buys Nuova, launches FCoE-compliant switch
    • SearchStorage FAQs
  • Related glossary terms

    Terms for Whatis.com - the technology online dictionary

    • MDI/MDIX (medium dependent interface/MDI crossover)
    • 802.3
    • Ethernet Glossary
    • Quad FastEthernet (QFE)
    • 10BASE-2
    • coaxial cable (illustrated)
    • Power over Ethernet (PoE)
    • Ethernet point-of-presence (EPOP)
    • DVMRP (Distance Vector Multicast Routing Protocol)
    • 1000BASE-T

This was first published in July 2012

Join the conversationComment

Share
Comments

    Results

    Contribute to the conversation

    All fields are required. Comments will appear at the bottom of the article.
    Back to top
    gipoco.com is neither affiliated with the authors of this page nor responsible for its contents. This is a safe-cache copy of the original web site.