Twentieth Anniversary of the American Green Movement
Twenty years ago, on August 10-12, 62 people came together in St. Paul,
Minnesota on the campus of Macalester College, to found the United States'
first national
Green organization, the Green Committees of Correspondence. The meeting
brought
together activists from New York City, New England, the Missouri Ozarks,
California,
and other areas. Participants divided into groups of three to imagine what a
future green
society would be like. Words such as "empowerment", "neighborliness", "connectedness
with the earth" and "community" emerged from this exercise. A shared vision
seemed
evident, but also differences; some which would later become major issues
among
American Greens.
The official report from the St. Paul conference notes that "Several
people thought
we needed to work towards an independent political process,
though many others argued third parties are a dead-end --."
Thus the 'split' between
"movement and party", between an activist and a ballot box oriented American Green
movement, was present from the beginning.
The name "Committees of Correspondence" was chosen intentionally
to "recall the network established by grassroots democrats in the struggle
for
Independence --". It was also stated that "The Committees of Correspondence
will
maintain gender balance and move towards racial, ethnic and class
inclusiveness." The
meeting ended at 3:00 p.m., Sunday, August 12, 1984.
One interesting aspect of this first meeting is the participants' attempt
to define
"Greenness". The following draft definition ends the meeting's official
report:
"Green" politics interweaves ecological wisdom,
decentralization of economic and political power
wherever practical, personal and social responsibility,
global security, and community self-determination
within the context of respect for diversity of heritage
and religion. It advocates non-violent action,
cooperative world order, and self-reliance."
Here can be seen the earliest form of today's well known Ten Key Values; a
statement of principles which reflected the diverse origins of the American
Green
movement.
Mark Satin has posted (radicalmiddle.com/ten_key_values.htm),
that the Ten Key Values grew out of a late night session at St. Paul led by
grassroots
activist Jeff Land and himself. West coast author and feminist activist
Charlene Spretnak
and members of Murray Bookchin's New England Institute for Social Ecology
were also
primary contributors. After this session, an East coast, West coast dialogue
went on for
several months, which ended in the release of a final version at the end of
1984
superseding the paragraph quoted above.
Greens today still debate the exact meaning of the Ten Key Values: which
today
are generally listed as Ecological Wisdom, Grassroots
Democracy, Decentralization, Community-based Economics, Feminism, Respect for
Diversity, Personal and Global responsibility, and Future
Focus/Sustainability.
Never-the-less, whatever any one Greens' individual
interpretation, there can be no doubt that underlying the ten principles is a
vision of
definitely radical implication; no less than the creation of a new world from
the shell of the old!
(Reprinted from Green Politics, Fall 2004)
The Greens, Past, Present and Future
Two opposed images of reality struggle for acceptance today. One is the
world of
happy, wealthy, zestful consumers, projected daily from corporate controlled
TV
screens. The other is the violence, emotional isolation, job insecurity,
environmental
pollution, global climate change, and resource depletion we experience-either
directly
or indirectly-in our actual lives. More than anything else, the Green
movement is a
movement to help people recognize the falseness of the first image. Once
this has
happened, people will began more and more to work together to change reality
to become
the kind of world they really want it to be. However, for the Green movement
to
succeed it is important that Greens themselves have a clear image of who they
really
are. One of the best ways to do this is to understand Green history, the
story of the
Green movement past and present.
Past: As the article above explains, the United States Green movement
began 20 years ago with the Green Committees of Correspondence (GCoC),
founded in
August 1984. The GCoC did not represent any one political philosophy;
generally,
however, it emphasized activism, education, and community organizing over
electoral
politics. Looking critically at the American politic system, the majority of
the GCoC felt
that until much grassroots organizing had been done-as an early Green
pamphlet put it,
until there were "active Green groups in every neighborhood and town in the
country"-a
Green electoral party could be no more than symbolic. These early Greens
also envisioned
the Green movement as working for a radical, overall change in American
society, not just
reforms. The organizational form adopted to reach this goal was a network of
dues
paying members, grouped in multi-state Regions and connected through a
national
Clearinghouse.
By the beginning of the 1990s, however, some Greens were becoming
impatient
with the GCoC's strategy of radical, slow, long-term organizing. These
Greens-mostly
members of the GCoC-called for the immediate creation of state Green parties,
and some
for a national Green party. Because of this, two factions began to compete
inside the
GCoC. One, a "movement" faction, supported the GCoC's original strategy of
activism
and community organizing; the other, a "party" faction, called for a turn to
electoral
politics. In 1990, state Green parties were organized in Alaska and
California. In 1991, in
order to resolve the conflict between movement and party factions, the name
of the GCoC
was changed to The Greens/Green Party USA (TG/GPUSA). Organizationally, this
meant that The Greens would remain an activist ("movement") party based on
dues paying
members, but that it would include a place for the affiliation of state Green
parties.
In 1996, several state Green parties came together to form the
Association of State
Green Parties (NASGP) outside The Greens/Green Party USA. In 2000, Ralph
Nader
was nominated by the NASGP as a Green presidential candidate; his campaign
was also
endorsed by TG/GPUSA. In July 2001, the NASGP changed its name to the Green
Party
of the United States (GPUS).
Present: As a result of the above history, there are two Green parties in the
US today.
One, The Greens/Green Party USA traces its beginning to 1984. The other, the
Green
Party of the United States, can trace its roots to the formation of the ASGP
in 1996, and is
essentially a split of more politically conventional Greens from the GCoC and
TG/GPUSA. This year, the GPUS is running David Cobb as its candidate for pres
ident;
Ralph Nader is running as an independent; and at the recent Green Congress in
Chicago,
The Greens/Green Party USA reaffirmed it commitment to the mission of the
original
American Greens, long-term activist organizing for true democracy and a Green
society.
Such a vision of radical hope is one of the most valuable resources any party
can offer
society.
Future: As the global ecology continues to deteriorate, the gulf between
rich and poor
widens, and the US government settles into what appears will be a permanent
militarized
economy, Greens everywhere will face fundamental questions about how to
proceed, as
ordinary' ( non-activist ) citizens. Will America's traditional
once-each-four-years
trip to the polls politics be sufficient in times such as these; or is a more
activist approach
to politics necessary? What can be done to assure a secure future for
family, children and
grandchildren in the difficult times which are no doubt ahead? These are
questions each
Green and each American can only answer for her or himself. One thing is
certain
however: the Green Party USA and the principles guiding it will be a
significant part of
whatever future unfolds.
(Reprinted from Green Politics, Fall 2004)
back to top
|