FOSSology: Activity

Support #3687 (New): Ignore containers in Show

2012-11-15T00:18:21+00:00

[16:46] <sutula> I also have a specific feature request: Clicking on a "Show" for specific licenses generates a bunch of places where that license is found. It would be nice to have the option of not seeing "containers"...in fact, maybe we should always only see the individual files that caused those containers to be in the "show" list.
[16:47] <sutula> I ask because at least in our review use, the only thing we care about is the files with the license, not the containers.
[16:48] <sutula> a) We have to manually look at and ignore the containers, and this means that typically, a single file generates maybe 5 license "hits".

Bug #3537 (Feedback): Change order for checking BSD and Apache licenses

2012-11-14T07:49:35+00:00

larry shi wrote:

ls RedHat/RedHat.tar.dir/RedHat/ksh-20040229-8.src.rpm.unpacked.dir/ast-ksh.2004-02-29.tgz.dir/ast-ksh.2004-02-29.dir/
lib ------------ NOTICE -- LICENSED SOFTWARE -- SEE README FOR DETAILS ------------ README src

FATAL nomos.c.706: "RedHat/RedHat.tar.dir/RedHat/ksh-20040229-8.src.rpm.unpacked.dir/ast-ksh.2004-02-29.tgz.dir/ast-ksh.2004-02-29.dir/------------" is not a plain file
FATAL nomos.c.706: "NOTICE" is not a plain file

Bob,

when I did testing for nomos, find this issue, do you think we have to fix it? this file name is very special.

Bug #2517 (Resolved): A few problems in the automation/makefiles

2012-11-14T07:34:35+00:00

all the issues this task mentioned are fixed till svn 6262.

also I did a little changes on Unit Test job on jenkins.

anyone who will verify/close this task, if you are not sure how to verify this task, please contact with Larry.

Bug #3681 (New): can not get files under selected folder except Software Repository on Delete Upl...

2012-11-14T01:38:24+00:00

Bug #3537 (In Progress): Change order for checking BSD and Apache licenses

2012-11-13T08:46:23+00:00

ls RedHat/RedHat.tar.dir/RedHat/ksh-20040229-8.src.rpm.unpacked.dir/ast-ksh.2004-02-29.tgz.dir/ast-ksh.2004-02-29.dir/
lib ------------ NOTICE -- LICENSED SOFTWARE -- SEE README FOR DETAILS ------------ README src

FATAL nomos.c.706: "RedHat/RedHat.tar.dir/RedHat/ksh-20040229-8.src.rpm.unpacked.dir/ast-ksh.2004-02-29.tgz.dir/ast-ksh.2004-02-29.dir/------------" is not a plain file
FATAL nomos.c.706: "NOTICE" is not a plain file

Bug #1185: can not move one upload from one folder to 'software repository'

2012-11-13T06:25:05+00:00

increase the priority of this task.

Bug #2517: A few problems in the automation/makefiles

2012-11-13T06:15:37+00:00

2. What are the lib-php-Xunit tests that show up in the unit test report? We couldn’t readily find them in >the source

Sorry, after some investigation, I can not get it work, will try to get help from mark.

fixed in svn 6261 and 6260.

Document: Agenda and Minutes for November 12/13 Meeting

2012-11-12T23:44:43+00:00

Agenda¶

Individual updates

Attendees¶

Mary
- Focused on bring up new fossology server. Siteminder PRO installed today. Dan is debugging a problem with the private network. This is the last thing that needs to be fixed before we switch servers.
- I’ve been trying to help 2 fossology users on the mailing list.
  - Valerie: Delagent selection window empty
  - Michael: Scheduler will not start; Error is “./fo_scheduler: symbol lookup error: ./fo_scheduler: undefined symbol: g_thread_create”

Vincent
- Update wiki page about using project builder.
- Finishing up package install testing.

Larry
- Will try to have bug #2517 resolved today.
- Will work on bug #3537 : change order for checking bsd & apache licenses.
- Larry see if Michael’s problem is due to running FOSSology for FC17 on a FC15 system.

Bob
- still working on user permissions scheme
- taking FTO Tuesday afternoon

Antelink describes FOSSology source install

2012-11-12T22:28:10+00:00

Our friends at Antelink publish their instructions for installing fossology 2.1 from source.

www.antelink.com/blog/how-install-your-own-fossology-instance.html

Bug #3675 (New): UI - API confusion

2012-11-08T18:04:44+00:00

Both license and copyright one-shot can be accessed both as a UI and http API. However, they are inconsistent. The license one-shot is an API, the copyright one-shot is a UI. We need both UI's and API's.
We must leave the license one-shot URL as is since PTS depends on it. So we either need another plugin to implement the UI, or we need a new URL parameter to execute the UI code. Larry, implemented this UI not long ago but the code had to be reverted since it broke the API. We need that code back but in a way not to break the API.

Here is a diff to convert the copyright one-shot into an api:

24d23
< 
32,34c31,33
<   public $Dependency = array(
<         "view",
<         "copyrightview" 
---
>    public $Dependency = array(
>  //      "view",
>   //      "copyrightview" 
36c35,36
<   public $NoHTML = 0;
---
> 
>   public $NoHTML = 1;
38,39c38,39
<   // public $DBaccess   = PLUGIN_DB_NONE;
<   // public $LoginFlag  = 0;
---
>   public $DBaccess   = PLUGIN_DB_NONE;
>   public $LoginFlag  = 0;
42,43c42,43
<   public $DBaccess = PLUGIN_DB_ANALYZE;
<   public $LoginFlag = 1;
---
>   // public $DBaccess = PLUGIN_DB_ANALYZE;
>   // public $LoginFlag = 1;
55c55
<     $View = & $Plugins[plugin_find_id("view") ];
---
>    // $View = & $Plugins[plugin_find_id("view") ];
76c76
<         //print $Line;
---
>         print $Line;
82c82
<           $View->AddHighlight($match['start'][0], $match['end'][0], $colors[$match['type'][0]], '', $match['content'][0],-1);
---
>      //     $View->AddHighlight($match['start'][0], $match['end'][0], $colors[$match['type'][0]], '', $match['content'][0],-1);
89,90c89,90
<       $View->SortHighlightMenu();
<       $View->ShowView($Fin,$ModBack, 0,0,NULL,True, False); // do not show Header and micro menus
---
>       ///$View->SortHighlightMenu();
>       //$View->ShowView($Fin,$ModBack, 0,0,NULL,True, False); // do not show Header and micro menus

Bug #3663 (Closed): Create new VMs for building packages of ubuntu-12.10

2012-11-08T17:00:01+00:00

nightly build now produces packages for ubuntu 12.10

Bug #3669 (Closed): get Unit and Functional test work again

2012-11-08T16:57:57+00:00

All tests passing successfully again.

Bug #3669 (Resolved): get Unit and Functional test work again

2012-11-08T10:11:57+00:00

fixed in svn 6258, but the new unit/functional test need more time to complete.

Bug #3663 (Resolved): Create new VMs for building packages of ubuntu-12.10

2012-11-08T07:07:22+00:00

ubuntu-12.10 package build added to nightly build.

Bug #3537: Change order for checking BSD and Apache licenses

2012-11-05T15:50:20+00:00

Hi Larry, I can't agree with Raino's patch until it is tested out to make sure it doesn't break any other signatures. This is what RedHat.tar is for. Raino does an excellent job with his patches but he depends on us for more complete testing to make sure the patch doesn't break something else.