About

RSS feed

  • spacer

Search this site

  • -->


Comments Policy

  • Updated policy; please read.

Categories

  • a1. National Debt
  • a2. Economics in Plain Talk
  • c1. Words of Wisdom
  • Current Affairs
  • e1. General
  • f1. Good Books

Suggestion box

  • My email
Add me to your TypePad People list

« FQ.06.46: Favorite Quote for This Week | Main | Where Have All the Statesmen Gone? »

New policy: Comments are on

spacer UPDATED, 3/4/08:  Comments are on; I get an email notification of each one.  High-integrity people are more than welcome here.  Not welcome here are smart-alecs, trolls, or (especially) people who refuse to reveal their real names and backgrounds to me when I ask privately. As you compose your comments, the best approach is to assume that I will ask you for those.  That information, if given, will be kept private; refusal to give the information will tell me just about everything I need to know. 

Because of a new constraint on the time I have for managing this blog, I've had to develop the habit of swiftly banning low-integrity cowards -- and it has been working well.  I wish I'd implemented that policy sooner. 

Anonymous commenters have been and will continue to be ignored.

Aside from the usual things that get commenters banned (profanity, etc.), one of my pet peeves is the ad hominem attack, also know as the personal attack.  It’s when somebody finds it more difficult to address the topic than to attack the person who raised the topic, and even college professors have displayed a startling immaturity by resorting to it (... "so-and-so is the stupidest person on the planet" or "dumbest person alive", etc.).  At several other blogs it has pretty much ruined things for objective commenters, but I won’t let that happen at my blog.  Also, if you want to call me names, feel free, but please use email instead of comments.  It’s easy; my email is undisguised (thanks to gmail’s excellent spam filter).

UPDATE, 3/30/07:  Also, if you want to preach, or to argue solely by quoting others, feel free to put that stuff in a private email to me, instead of posting it as a public comment. 

Posted on 18 November 2006 | Permalink

TrackBack

TrackBack URL for this entry:
www.typepad.com/services/trackback/6a00d83451c0c869e200d8346876b969e2

Listed below are links to weblogs that reference New policy: Comments are on:

Comments

Great site , enjoy your work immensely

Posted by: tt | 19 November 2006 at 14:59

re: "Cool election map

One-person-one-vote; I like that concept better than one-acre-one-vote."

Posted on 10 November 2006

One-person-one vote if enforced insures the end of a Republic which quickly segues into a Democracy which dissolves into Dictatorship.

Dan

Posted by: Dan Kurt | 19 November 2006 at 17:35

Alright, hey keep up the great work Steve with this indispensable blog.

Posted by: Kevin | 19 November 2006 at 22:59

Excellent!

I'm looking forward to discussing the important topics posted here in comment forums.

Posted by: Bret | 20 November 2006 at 00:41

Dan-

Good point. One person one vote within one state is more precise. The electoral college is an important institution.

Posted by: Steve | 20 November 2006 at 07:24

Yeah I don't think people should attack hominy either. It ain't fancy but I like it.

Posted by: MikeD | 20 November 2006 at 16:01

Mr Conover,

I am a MBA student trying to write a paper on the pros and cons of paying down the US national debt and am by no means an expert. I was wondered how the green-yellow-red range was set on the Dooms Day Dashboard for the National Debt vs GDP? It seems to vary from the 80 % to 40% range I saw on a graphic from your “Fiscal Responsibility Defined at Last” article on your website. What is a good max to target; 80% or something about or post WWII of 120%?

How can we make sure that our elected official are investing our money to maximize returns(security, GDP growth, etc)

Thanks in advance for the comments. Others reviewing this, please comment as well.

Thanks.


www.whitehouse.gov/omb/budget/fy2007/pdf/07msr.pdf

Posted by: Jeff | 28 November 2006 at 11:48

I want to congratulate the person who writes about the National debt being a myth.
I absolutely agree with you on the phrase : "the national debt is a myth", but I'm not too sure about your explanation. By the way, can you tell me the % of budget spending in relation to GNP or GDP? let me hear from you

Posted by: jesus delgado | 21 January 2007 at 02:14

How does or is the U.S. Government buying its' own debt. I don't understand your pie chart. How can the government own its own debt. Does it simply make a loan to itself. I.E. meaning it just prints up more money from the federal Reserve and then pay it interest from taxes received. That would make the US dollar worthless. And that the reason why gold is now over $600 a ounce. Can you say fiat money. The only reason inflation isn't higher is because of all the cheap goods were getting from china. Otherwise our current money and banking system is worthless. Money based on nothing is worth nothing. The true worth of our dollar can be found by looking at metals such as gold, silver, and etc..

Posted by: Bill Allen | 20 March 2007 at 15:03

Bill:
Two ways (if we can classify the Fed as a part of the govt): 1-The SS trust fund's dollar surplus is converted into interest-earning bonds, to preclude the inferior alternative of leaving cash in the SS trust fund and borrowing more principal and paying more interest to the public; 2-The Fed, to increase the money supply commensurate with growth in the real economy, purchases treasury securities from the public. This is what is commonly called "printing money", which in turn is commonly misinterpreted as "always inflationary." It's not inflationary when the money supply grows at exactly the same rate as real goods & services; it's anti-deflationary, not inflationary.

Sounds like you're a fan of the gold standard. You might want to read the comments under the following post:
www.optimist123.com/optimist/2007/03/balanced_budget.html
My portion of that exchange sums up why I oppose a gold standard.

Posted by: Steve | 20 March 2007 at 17:31

good

Posted by: wow gold | 20 August 2007 at 02:59

Located your site on a search for 1938 Bankruptcy.

I found it interesting you mention the American government could not go bankrupt.

I also find it very interesting that in fact the American government did exactly this in 1938, just supposedly kept this quiet from the public.

In a country capable of printing money, America decides to outsource this job to a private party... Federal Reserve. There has been mentioning of direct links with government organizations to British and the International Banks.

Documentation exists stating bankruptcy occured in 1938 by President Roosevelt at the Geneva
Conventions held in Switzerland.

It was also around this time the Federal was created. Learning of this information, it appears to me that if Pres. Roosevelt actually filed bankruptcy, then America ceased to exist in 1938 and the British have held control since.

I am attempting to search more information and pondered what your view might be on this matter.

Posted by: Harley Kelchner | 18 March 2008 at 02:22

The comments to this entry are closed.

Popular Posts

  • Pie chart of who owns the national debt
  • Trick question
  • Sound money vs gold
  • Gold standard: a bad idea
  • IOUSA vs TIT
  • National Debt Thermometer
  • Energy series (1 of 7)
  • It's productivity, stupid
  • "Tax cuts for the ______."
  • Why Debt Doomsday is a myth
  • "Fiscal Responsibility" defined
  • Money series (1 of 6)

Recent Posts

  • The right enemy
  • A debt ceiling with teeth?
  • The unfair consequences of a Buffett tax
  • "Fiscal Responsibility": Four possible meanings
  • When to borrow on credit - according to Washington, Jefferson, Reagan, and the Constitution
  • Two surprises: China doesn't own us; and the debt burden is relatively low
  • The payroll tax holiday: Throwing FDR under the bus
  • Class warfare can be good for us
  • Balanced Budget Amendment: Why it's a bad idea
  • How the Democrats and the Tea Party botch Reagan's legacy

Archives

  • June 2012
  • April 2012
  • March 2012
  • January 2012
  • December 2011
  • November 2011
  • October 2011
  • September 2011
  • August 2011
  • July 2011
Blog powered by TypePad

Web-Stat


gipoco.com is neither affiliated with the authors of this page nor responsible for its contents. This is a safe-cache copy of the original web site.