Who's afraid of the fiscal cliff?
By Steve Eide on November 12, 2012 7:27 AM
| No Comments
| No TrackBacks
Some have claimed that the fiscal cliff threatens doom for state and local governments-are they right?
Well, there would be cuts, but let's maintain perspective. There are some important mitigating factors to consider.
State and local governments' most direct exposure to the fiscal cliff is through the spending cuts portion known as "sequestration." Sequestration dates back to the summer of 2011's debt ceiling deal and would total $984 billion in cuts over nine years, split evenly between defense and non-defense programs. The non-defense cuts affect some Federal grants-in-aid programs to state and local governments.
The first mitigating factor to consider is that the defense and non-defense cuts compose only 11% of the total fiscal cliff (see Table 1).
The second mitigating factor is that the cuts are really caps. With the exception of 2013, annual outlays would not be reduced, or even frozen. Sequestration would effect a reduction in projected funding levels, by around 8% in initial years, declining to 5.4% in later years (see Table 3).
Third, much is exempt from the cuts. According to the Peter G. Peterson Foundation, over 100 accounts will be untouched by sequestration (including the "Pensions for Former Presidents" account!). Congress exempted most of the big ticket grants-in-aid programs such as Medicaid and Temporary Assistance to Needy Families (TANF). The exempted programs noted in gray in the Table below add up to at least 2/3 of the total annual federal aid to state and local governments.
Categories:
- Politics
Tags:
- fiscal cliff,
- Medicaid,
- state budgets
No TrackBacks
TrackBack URL: www.publicsectorinc.com/cgi-bin/mt/mt-tb.cgi/1134
Related Entries:
- The muni market, still unperturbed
- State tax collections slowing again
- California: Anatomy of an exploding government obligation
- Utah and pension reform
- Pension shootout brewing in Texas
- Parks scandal spotlights Brown's false choices
- Common sense on retiree healthcare in California
- Does Medicare reform threaten states' fiscal stability?
- The high costs of pay-as-you-go
- Is there a local government hiring boom?
- Irresistible pension force vs. immovable Medicaid object
- Michigan comes close to killing stealth unionization
- Slow growth, high debt states worry Washington GOP
- Unions prioritize themselves over services for the sick and poor
Search
- Subscribe to this blog's feed
Archives
Tag Cloud
- California
- pensions
- unions
- Jerry Brown
- Wisconsin
- pension reform
- Illinois
- budget
- collective bargaining
- New York
- teachers unions
- New Jersey
- CalPERS
- taxes
- Scott Walker
- bankruptcy
- California Teachers Association
- pension
- Pensions
- city governments
Authors
- Andrew Biggs (3)
- Andrew Marcum (4)
- Ben Boychuk (29)
- Ben DeGrow (11)
- Brett Healy (7)
- Collin Hitt (1)
- Christian Schneider (18)
- Daniel DiSalvo (133)
- E.J. McMahon (59)
- Eileen Norcross (48)
- Greg R. Lawson (7)
- Josh Barro (38)
- James Hohman (13)
- Jason Richwine (10)
- Kasia Zabawa (37)
- Michael Allegretti (31)
- Marcus Winters (1)
- Nicole Gelinas (21)
- Paul Kersey (12)
- Paul Tyahla (7)
- Rick Dreyfuss (3)
- Raymond Niemiec (9)
- Steve Eide (29)
- Steven Greenhut (190)
- Steve Malanga (192)
- Tim Hoefer (6)
- Terry Moe (3)
- Troy Senik (118)
- F. Vincent Vernuccio (1)
- Zachary Janowski (11)
Join the conversation