Open Codex Collaborative Code and Culture

Responses to "Free as in Sexist?"

It's always gratifying when people read something I've written and point out shortcomings or issues that could be further explored. (This is far superior to not being read at all -- and even receiving empty platitudes.) I also wish I could amend a publication with links to those responses and the resulting conversation. Since I can't do that, I do want to recommend the following.

—

Sky Croeser points out that I conflate anarchism and libertarianism when I speak of a free speech ethic that favors potentially alienating speech over inclusive participation. I agree they are not the same. Her description of the difference is an excellent gloss of my own movement from identifying as a libertarian in my teens to an anarchist in my twenties.

Libertarians tends to privilege an extreme individualism, failing to acknowledge the role of structural oppression in creating inequality, and seeking to diminish (or extinguish) the role of the state in favour of more freedom for the market. Anarchists, on the other hand, tend to place individual freedom within the context of community, acknowledging the role of structural oppression, and critiquing both the state and the market as systems for allocating resources.

My intention was not to say they are the same, but to build upon earlier scholars who note a particular speech ethic that exists within both constituent strands of Net culture and the effect that ethic can have on participation. Indeed, as I note in the paper, it is kind of crazy to place the political ideologies of Richard Stallman and Eric Raymond alongside one another. But I think you can when you ask if their conceptions of "freedom" act similarly with respect to permitting alienating speech, or, at the least, in not recognizing this possibility. That said, I'd love to see a comparative analysis of the political philosophies of Richard Stallman, Eric Raymond, Bruce Perens, Mitch Kapor, Esther Dyson, and Jimmy Wales. (Following Fred Turner's studies of counterculture to cyberculture, I think there is an interesting east vs west coast divide.)

I also agree with Croeser that I pass lightly over possible remedies to the problems I identify. This is a limitation of space and focus for any given piece. For instance, in discussing online communities I -- and others -- frequently make use of Jo Freeman's seminal The Tyranny of Structureless. However, the latter part of her essay on "principles of democratic structuring" has largely been ignored in the online context and much more can, and should, be said. For myself, I do plan to focus more on "geek feminism" interventions in future work.

—

Over at Geek Feminism Tim Chevalier has posted a thoughtful reflection. A hesitation I even have in discussion the "gender gap" is the implication of a binary, essentialist gender. Again, for reasons of space and focus, I removed my discussion of this, but I greatly appreciate and recommend Tim's perspective.

Then I try to imagine what it would be like for me if on top of all of this, I felt like I had to conform to a vaguely woman-ish gender role. I didn’t know I wasn’t female until I was 18, and didn’t know I was male until I was 26, but I never felt much pressure to be what girls or women were supposed to be. On the other hand, if I was a cis woman, or even more so, if I was a trans woman (since trans women get expected to conform to gender stereotypes for women even more so than cis women are when their trans status is known), working in the industry I work in, I would have an almost impossible set of constraints to solve. As Reagle shows, success and status in open-source (and even in non-technical "free culture" communities like Wikipedia editing) are correlated with adopting a (superficially) overconfident, aggressive, argumentative persona. Women get to choose between being socially stigmatized for violating gender norms, or being ignored or mocked for violating open-source cultural norms. It's a double bind.

There are comments.

Other articles

The Nuance of the Gendergap Statistics

Wed 30 January 2013
By Joseph Reagle

In social.

tags: genderWikipedia

I don't often work on quantitative projects, but since publishing Gender Bias in Wikipedia and Brittanica with Lauren Rhue I've come to appreciate just how difficult it can be to communicate findings unambiguously. Of course, had we found that Wikipedia had no biographies of women that would be ...
read more
There are comments.
Free as in Sexist?: Free Culture and the Gender Gap

Thu 10 January 2013
By Joseph Reagle

In social.

tags: genderwikipedia

First Monday's 200th issue is up (I first published there 17 years ago!) and includes "Free as in Sexist?: Free Culture and the Gender Gap".

Despite the values of freedom and openness, the free culture movement’s gender balance is as skewed (or more so) as that of the ...
read more
There are comments.
Ruby UK Conference and White Men
Mon 19 November 2012
By Joseph Reagle

In social.

tags: gender

The British Ruby Conference was canceled [andrewnez2012brc] after the composition of the speakers list, 100% white men, was noted and discussed on twitter [Susser2012nsl]. The ensuing discussion touched upon:
1. the merits of meritocracy (e.g., the call was open, the best were invited)
2. in/out-group dynamics (e.g., this should ...
read more
There are comments.
Gender in F/LOSS

Tue 25 September 2012
By Joseph Reagle

In social.

tags: gender

Dawn Nafus has published an excellent paper entitled “Patches Don’t Have Gender”: What is not Open in Open Source Software. When I read it, I did so with some trepidation as I feared it might render my draft Free as in Sexist redundant. However, while we make a similar ...
read more
There are comments.
Keeping up? Fun or work?

Mon 02 July 2012
By Joseph Reagle

In social.

tags: gender

In Nafus’ piece on Patches Don’t Have Gender there is a statement that initially puzzled me. Nafus writes:

New programming languages similarly proliferate at a rate that confounds everyone involved…. We experienced exactly this problem in learning to participate in the F/LOSS community in Paris. What at first ...
read more
There are comments.
Is the Internet convincing women not to study computer science?
Wed 27 June 2012
By Joseph Reagle

In social.

tags: gender

I recently encountered Beth Andres-Beck’s (2012) interesting note asking is reading the Internet convincing women not to study computer science? I find her affirmative conclusion compelling as she shows:
1. an increasing gap in interest in C.S. between men and women post-Internet (1996) in the U.S.;
2. a negative ...
read more
There are comments.
Female Internet pioneers: A history yet to be done

Wed 06 June 2012
By Joseph Reagle

In social.

tags: gender

Legal scholars have a saying that hard cases (i.e., unusual/confused) make bad law (i.e., legal decisions). The recent lead in a story about sexual harassment in IT venture capital is probably a poor case for me to write something sensible. But the claim that “men invented the ...
read more
There are comments.
Gender Bias in Wikipedia and Britannica

Fri 02 September 2011
By Joseph Reagle

In social.

tags: gender

The International Journal of Communication has published Lauren Rhue's and my paper on "Gender Bias in Wikipedia and Britannica". The method of crawling the sites, the large size of the comparison, and the guessing of genders were interesting technical challenges that once addressed permitted us to write:

Abstract: Is ...
read more
There are comments.
Web exceptionalism: gender

Wed 13 October 2010
By Joseph Reagle

In social.

tags: gender

As part of the fellows program at the Berkman Center this semester is a weekly discussion period that has the theme of Web Exceptionalism, the "belief (or attitude) that the Web is a significant break in the course of history, fundamentally changing institutions, norms, behaviors... It is not always proposed ...
read more
There are comments.

Page 1 / 2 »

social

atom feed
github
google+

Related searches:
gender social reagle joseph culture

gipoco.com is neither affiliated with the authors of this page or responsible
for its contents. This is a safe-cache copy of the original web site.

gipoco.com is neither affiliated with the authors of this page nor responsible for its contents. This is a safe-cache copy of the original web site.

Open Codex Collaborative Code and Culture

Other articles

The Nuance of the Gendergap Statistics

Free as in Sexist?: Free Culture and the Gender Gap

Ruby UK Conference and White Men

Gender in F/LOSS

Keeping up? Fun or work?

Is the Internet convincing women not to study computer science?

Female Internet pioneers: A history yet to be done

Gender Bias in Wikipedia and Britannica

Web exceptionalism: gender

blogroll

social