Who I am: Chris Lehmann
What I do: Principal of the Science Leadership Academy in Philadelphia, PA (Opening 9/06). What I did: Technology Coordinator / English Teacher / Girls Basketball Coach / Ultimate Coach at the Beacon School, a fantastic progressive public high school in Manhattan. Email: chris [at] practicaltheory [dot] org. Comments
Karen Greenberg about Saving Lives v. Changing Lives
Tue, 14.08.2012 11:13 Perhaps a more apt term would be "altering trajectories". Think physics - two objects in motion [...] Amethyst about Saving Lives v. Changing Lives Mon, 13.08.2012 22:51 I really appreciate this blog entry. Our roles as teachers require, at our best, a deep [...] Mark Ahlness about The Long Haul Mon, 13.08.2012 22:33 Chris, thanks. Pete is my hero, and has been for a while, but now that I'm retired, after 31 years [...] Gary Stager about Saving Lives v. Changing Lives Mon, 13.08.2012 22:15 Chris, No need to worry about semantic arguments. Others all around us are debasing our [...] Chris Lehmann about Educational Colonialism Mon, 13.08.2012 22:00 Yup. I think there are always possible problems with everything. It's why we always try to remember [...] Subscribe to Practical TheoryBlogroll Me!
Creative CommonsBlog AdministrationOpen login screen
Syndicate This Blog
RSS 0.91 feed
RSS 1.0 feed
RSS 2.0 feed
ATOM 0.3 feed
Powered by |
< The Long Haul | Moving Day... >
Tuesday, August 14. 2012Saving Lives v. Changing Lives
I went to a principal workshop today and the presenter had a lot of really good things to say. (And I'll be honest I can be a tough audience.) Much of the powerful take aways dealt with building capacity for change in our schools, and how principals can unwittingly build resistance for their ideas rather than support. The talk was based on the book Transforming School Culture by Anthony Muhammad, And the talk was good enough - persuasive enough - that I'm going to give the book a very careful read. And at a very basic level, I was appreciative of the fact that the presentation asked us to be reflective about our practice in a way that did not make me, or anyone else from what I saw, feel defensive about our work. That, in and of itself, is a worthwhile workshop.
But there was one piece of the presenter's talk that I felt uncomfortable with. Multiple times, he reminded us that we were, "In the arduous task of saving lives." And on one level, he had the chops to make that claim. He and his faculty, and without question he made sure we understood that his faculty did amazing work, took a school that had less than a 60% graduation rate and raised it to a 91% graduation rate in 6 years. Moreover, as he told his own story of being an English language learner and how he felt his own life was saved by a teacher who cared for him, it was clear that, for him, the work is around saving lives. But I worry about that as a mantra - a lot. And I say this knowing full well that I've used that phrase. I don't think I've used it in the talks I give, although it's possible I have. But I know that I've said it to SLA teachers when they have gone above and beyond over and over again to impact the life (thank you to Dave Childers for that phrase today) of a student. And so I am struggling with these ideas even as I write them. What better thing to blog about, perhaps. I worry that when we say, "We are in the business of saving lives," we run the risk of doing several things wrong. I worry we over estimate our role in a child's life and under estimate the vital, powerful and important role of the parents, the community, and their culture, and in doing so, run the risk of becoming paternalistic in our dealings with both children and their families. I worry that in the name of saving children's lives, we can use that as an excuse not to take care of the adults doing the work as well. Because, after all, how can you stop working if your job is to save lives? Perhaps most of all, I worry that the idea that we are saving lives perpetuates the Messiah myth of the teacher and that myth leads to hubris which can blind us in so many ways. And yet I do believe we are engaged in the work of changing lives. I believe in the transformative school. I believe that a school that engages in deep learning within ethic of care can have a positive and profound impact on the lives of all of those who live in it. I know beyond a shadow of a doubt that the students and teachers and parents of SLA forever changed my life for the better, and I hope their interactions with me have changed theirs for the better as well. Enough of them have told me so, that I have faith it is true. Maybe this is a semantic argument, but it doesn't feel like it to me. Schools should be places where young people and adults grow together. Yes, the adults are little older, a little more knowledgeable, and hopefully wiser, but hopefully still open to grow and open to learn. I believe students and teachers and principals can impact and change each other for the better. Change feels like a two-way street to me, but if we feel like we must be saviors, I worry that closes us off to be changed to ourselves, and in doing so, we make it that much harder to do the work we set out to do. Email Entry
Comments
Display comments as
(Linear | Threaded)
Chris,
No need to worry about semantic arguments. Others all around us are debasing our "professional" language. Words matter. Although I too have been in situations where I may have literally saved a kid's life by dispensing a bit of kindness, I am weary of the phrases "changing lives" and "transforming lives." Both statements connote a treatment model where you do something to someone else and produce a desired result. I do not believe this is the nature of education. Also, "saving" lives sounds like an emergency action that remediates a situation instantly. Education is not CPR.
#1
Gary Stager
(Link)
on
2012-08-13 22:15
(Reply)
I really appreciate this blog entry. Our roles as teachers require, at our best, a deep appreciation for possibility, for us as well as our students. They require hope, caring, love, hard work... but I like how you point out that if we are "saving lives" there is no end to that task. It burdens us awfully much. That's not to say that for some individuals we may have that impact one day, but when we accept that as a mission, it undervalues our lives outside of school, and maybe even our relationships with the students whose lives don't need saving, but who simply need a good education in a caring, safe environment. Please read my blog entry at www.storiesfromschoolaz.org/2012/08/who-are-we-protecting.html, which is somewhat related. Your post gave me a little tidbit of insight to layer onto the story told there.
#2
Amethyst
(Link)
on
2012-08-13 22:51
(Reply)
Perhaps a more apt term would be "altering trajectories". Think physics - two objects in motion strike each other, the path of each object is affected. One may be more profoundly affected than the other, but neither is a passive participant and both are capable of experiencing positive change.
#3
Karen Greenberg
on
2012-08-14 11:13
(Reply)
Add Comment
|
Online Ticketing for EduCon 2.5 powered by Eventbrite The Book!What School Leaders Need to Know About Digital Technologies and Social Media - Edited by Chris Lehmann and Scot McLeod
Calendar
The Quote File"A life is not important except for the impact it has on other lives" Jackie Robinson
QuicksearchArchivesFebruary 2013
January 2013 December 2012 November 2012 October 2012 September 2012 Recent... Older... Twit ThisCategories Blog News
Book Reviews
Ed-Admin
Ed-Tech
English
Fatherhood
General Ed
Life
Media
Podcast
Politics
School 2.0
SLA
Sports / Coaching
Technology
All categories |