APS Journals
- Current Issue
- Earlier Issues
- About This Journal
- Journal Staff
- About the Journals
- Search the Journals
- APS Home
- Join APS
|
APS » Journals » Reviews of Modern Physics » Advice for Referees - Reviews of Modern Physics
Printer-friendly versionSeptember 2011
Advice to Referees for
Reviews of Modern Physics
Thank you for agreeing to referee an article for Reviews of Modern Physics.
We ask you to consider especially the following four areas of concern, on which we
would welcome your comments.
- Accessibility. The audience of RMP includes physicists from a broad
range of fields and graduate students still considering possible areas of specialization. Many of these readers will not be familiar with the background
of the topic under discussion or with the specialized jargon of the field. A
clear introduction to the topic, both historical and analytical, is therefore an
important part of every RMP review.
- Organization and overview. For the practitioner, a review presents
the current status of a given topic. It surveys the literature, of course, but an ideal review is more than a catalog of work done. It is a critical distillation
of the progress on the topic, sorting out the main approaches and identifying the
most successful. This requires making critical judgments and organizing the material accordingly. Sometimes a table or two can provide a useful summary. It
is customary to end the review with a look at the open problems remaining and some
likely future directions for research.
- Balance. RMP strives to publish reviews of topics in which there is much
research activity, and most of these reviews are written by authors who have made
important contributions. We expect that their contributions will be treated in the
review and we do not object if they openly admit to a bias for their own approaches.
However, a reviewer has the obligation to deal with other points of view fairly and
to be sure that all important work is represented.
- Economy vs. completeness. RMP has a length limit of 50,000 words
per article. We believe that this length is not only adequate to review most topics,
it is also as much as most readers will have time for. Hence it is important that
some choices be made in what to include and how much space to devote to each section.
Article Lookup
Journal Search
Site Search
Vol.:
Article:
|
or by citation or DOI
|
|
|