Roque’s Reply to Ampatuan Prosecutors

In the interest of fairness, I publish this letter which was emailed to me last night by Harry Roque in response to the allegations made against him by Dept. of Justice prosecutors in connection with the murder of another witness in the Ampatuan massacre case.

We thank Chief State Prosecutor Claro Arellano, Assistant Chief State Prosecutor Richard Anthony Fadulion and Senior State Prosecutor Juan Navera for their statement dated 25 June 2010.

Their statement – no, their very own admission – has verified facts that we have ourselves stated and as a result of which, the public and our courts can now determine if the Department’s refusal to provide to the now deceased witness “Jessie” was both legally and morally justified.

Please consider the following:

1. They agreed to interview the witness Jessie on March 1, 2010 at 3PM at the UP Law Center. Unknown to them, the UP Law Center was only a rendezvous as days before, we had already asked Chairperson Leila de Lima for her good offices by hosting and witnessing, for monitoring purposes, the government prosecutors interview with Jessie. The prosecutors on the day itself unilaterally declared that they would not travel to the UP Law Center and that the witness would have to be brought to the DOJ premises. We then asked the witness whether he was willing to go to the DOJ. His reply was: DOJ, “hwag doon. Hawak ng mga Ampatuan yun”. This was months before DOJ Secretary Agra would dismiss the criminal charges against Zaldy and Akmad Ampatuan. Clearly, it was not me or any of my colleagues said that the “DOJ” was hawak ng “Ampatuan”. It was the witness himself.

2. We confirm that we did suggest a hotel near the airport as an alternative venue for March 1. This was because of the refusal of the witness to step foot in the DOJ premises for reasons that he had already stated. We chose that particular American chain hotel precisely because of its very strict security arrangements replete with metal detectors and sniffing dogs at the entrance for both cars and individuals. We certainly felt that we would all be safer there compared to the DOJ, which incidentally, does not even have even hand held detectors at its entrance.

3. Initially, the WPP acceded. Again at the last minute, the Committee changed their decision and called the meeting off. He did say that aside from the DOJ as their preferred venue, then Secretary Agnes Devenadera was on the way out and the Committee had to confer with her. We brought the witness to Manila on that date precisely because upon the advice of the WPP, we needed Secretary Devenadera to approve his enrollment into the WPP. Apparently, the personal action of the sitting Secretary was required for this purpose. This was why we were both apprehensive and frustrated that the interview did not push through.

4. In any case, since the witness was already in Manila, we still brought him to the office of Chairperson De Lima who met and heard the testimony of the witness. One of the things Chair de Lima said in that meeting was that “she was frustrated that the CHR did not have the capability to provide witness protection as she would have otherwise provided it to Jessie”. We hope the incoming Secretary of Justice will confirm this fact.

5. It was after this aborted meeting that we decided to reduce into writing the application of the witness into the WPP. We included a detailed narration of what would have been his testimony. By then, I already suspected that the Department was lukewarm to admit the witness into the program for reasons unclear to me. I then thought that by detailing his proposed testimony, we would be able to memorialize the fact that the Department did not go out of its way to interview the witness despite the seriousness of his testimony. This turned out to be a very good decision because while the department now insists that the interview could have taken place at the vicinity of the DOJ, certainly, the seriousness of the testimony would otherwise lead to the conclusion that had the WPP used even ordinary diligence, they should have gotten out of their way to interview the witness. Besides, there is no rule which mandates that all interviews of the WPP should be conducted at the premises of the DOJ. Human experience, on the contrary, dictates that witnesses at risk would demand a more secure location than the premises of the DOJ. If security were indeed the concern, we wonder why the Prosecutors did not bother to suggest a military camp as a venue.

6. The records bear out the fact that we submitted to the DOJ a detailed narration of what would have been Jessie’s testimony. The state prosecutors have admitted receiving the narration attached to a communication we sent to the DOJ dated March 5, 2010; in fact, Assistant Chief State Prosecutor Richard Anthony Fadullon replied to our query in a letter dated March 11, 2010. They too admitted to this.

7. This belies Secretary Agra’s statement to Human Rights Watch (HRW) when the international human rights group told him about Jessie’s case that he has not heard of him. It boggles the mind that a matter of such high importance should not be communicated to him by his state prosecutors.

8. If the state prosecutors did not relay to him the facts regarding Jessie’s application into the WPP, they are liable for dereliction of duty. Assuming that Secretary Agra made good of his word to the HRW that he would look into the matter but in the process, the state prosecutors decided to withhold the information about Jessie from him, it only makes things worse for the state prosecutors. But this in itself does not absolve Secretary Agra of liability; after all, he is the Justice Secretary. How can he not now of the case when his own state prosecutors now admit they officially received and replied to an application for admission into the DOJ’s Witness Protection Program from Jessie? Ultimately, the buck stops where he sits at the top of the hierarchy at the DOJ. Given this, we wonder how he can say that he leaves the Department as one “extremely happy” man.

9. We confirm all the other details which they mentioned, including the meeting on March 12 where the lawyer of the witness – Macky Hernandez –was in attendance. This would prove in no uncertain terms that Secretary Agra lied when he claimed that I was representing the victims and a killer at the same time. I also confirm that I obtained for the witness, with his conformity, an independent counsel. This was because I knew that I had a conflict of interest and could not represent both victims and killer at the same time. The witness having his own counsel avoided this conflict and also ensured that the constitutional rights of a witness, whose testimony my clients required, would be protected.

10. While we admit that our second meeting did not push through because we could not bring the witness immediately from where he was then seeking sanctuary, we dispute that we did nothing to schedule a third one. It was Senior State Prosecutor Navera himself who, in refusing a third attempt at an interview said that they were no longer interested in meeting the witness. On that day, he arrogantly gave a deadline of 5 p.m., after which, he said, any talk about getting the witness into the WPP would be over and done with. He even sarcastically texted that we should not have brought him to the media first.

11. Further, their statement that I walked out of a hearing on January 20, 2010 is both a lie and is downright malicious. The records will show that the hearing on that day was recessed at 11AM after Gov. Magundadatu had finished with his cross-examination. It was during the recess that my clients and I talked to the assembled media outside the courtroom to discuss our filing with the Asian Inter-Governmental Commission on Human Rights. This was a filing that the prosecutors, echoing the position of then Secretary Devenedara, did not like because they mistook it as an expression of distrust with the on-going criminal proceedings here. On the contrary, the ASEAN filing was to declare the Philippines guilty of breach of obligation to protect and promote the right to life of the victims. With such a declaration, the Philippines would in turn be constrained to pay reparations to the victims.

12. I dispute Prosecutor Navera’s assertion that I have been belligerent. But I would agree that I have differed with the Public Prosecutors on at least three issues: First, the place of detention for the Ampatuans. The Public Prosecutors wanted a special detention for them, my clients wanted them to be treated like ordinary criminals and hence, they wanted them detained in the Quezon City Jail. We filed a “manifestation” in this regard after our clients confirmed that the Ampatuans were being given special treatment in the General Santos facility where many of the Ampatuans were then detained. The victims could file a manifestation, unlike a “motion” alone. A proper motion could only be filed with the conformity if the public prosecutor. Obviously, we filed a manifestation because the prosecutors until today – despite the press conferences and the parties in Bicutan where the Ampatuans are still detained – would not want to detain the accused in Quezon City jail.

13. Second, we filed similar “manifestations” on the issues of live coverage and the fact that the victims whom we represent have lost their trust and confidence on Secretary Agra. In the latter manifestation, we also asked the court to defer proceedings until after July 1 after the administration of President Arroyo. Again these were manifestations filed to register the sentiments of the victims to the court as otherwise, the conformity of the prosecutors would be required. Certainly, the 14 victims whom we represent have earned the right to let their feelings known to both the court and the public.

14. Finally, to dispute that we have been belligerent to the Public Prosecutors, we drafted and filed, with their conformity, a motion to cite BJMP officials in contempt for allowing accused Unsay to conduct a press conference in Bicutan.

15. While the prosecutors and I agree substantially on the recital of facts, the issue remains whether despite their detailed knowledge of the nature of testimony of the witness, they were justified in their failure to even listen to the witness in person. In this regard, we submit that Agra and the DOJ cannot wash their hands of the death of a potential witness with a potentially damning testimony against suspects in the most gruesome massacre perpetrated in the Philippines in recent memory. At the very least, they cannot escape liability and culpability for their dereliction of duty as public officers.

16. Ultimately, it is the State, through the DOJ, that is precisely tasked to protect and promote the right to life of individuals, especially those who have come to them for assistance. No amount of blaming others can absolve the DOJ and the state in this regard.

This entry was posted on Friday, July 9th, 2010 at 9:23 am and is filed under Posts. You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0 feed. Responses are currently closed, but you can trackback from your own site.

30 Responses to “Roque’s Reply to Ampatuan Prosecutors”

  1. GabbyD
    July 9th, 2010 15:33
    1

    you know what i find weird? that lawyers cannot agree on a place to meet.

    from my un-lawyer like POV, ANY PLACE for a meeting is better than having NO MEETING at all.

  2. kamagong
    July 9th, 2010 16:16
    2

    clearly, the department of justice had a lapse of judgement when they ignore and didn’t give due attention to a witness of a very heinous crime… the DOJ, along with its prosecutors, should have the utmost interest to gather all possible evidences that would strengthen the case…maybe, ngkulang lng sa padulas kya di nla bnigyan ng importansya, shame on you sec.agra and all the involved state prosecutors…obvious nmn kyo msyado,,,

  3. Leonard
    July 10th, 2010 08:46
    3

    Glad you posted the counter-point Ricky. Even after reading the DOJ’s twisted version of events, I could not help but wonder why they would not do everything in their power to ensure the safety & security of the witness. It shouldn’t matter where the guy wants to meet. Its HIS ass on the line and if wants to meet at a secure location, you get there ahead of time, secure the venue, meet the witness, take notes on the testimony and get him into protective custody! Its that simple!

  4. Leonard
    July 10th, 2010 11:35
    4

    Ricky,
    It is being reported that you have resigned your post from ABS-CBN…

    Mr. Carandang it has indeed been a pleasure to have you present the news to us in such a professional manner over the years. Your knowledge and insightful reporting should serve as an example to each and every reporter in the ABS-CBN news group. Although your path, as is being reported, takes you into Government, you have my best wishes in this new endeavor to help bring the Philippines out of the nightmare that was GMA and into the REAL 21st Century! Tagumpay!

    P.S.
    Please ask the President to pay FRAPORT so Terminal 3 can be the International Gateway is was meant to be and…

    Tell the DOTC & CAAP to stop making excuses and fix or replace the dam NAVAIDs!

  5. The EQualizer Post
    July 10th, 2010 12:03
    5

    For your new job:

    “How shall freedom be defended? By arms when it is attacked by arms; by truth when it is attacked by lies; by democratic faith when it is attacked by authoritarian dogma. Always, and in the final act, by dedication and faith.” Archibald MacLeish

  6. Sam
    July 10th, 2010 19:29
    6

    Ricky,

    Ngayon palang ay I would like to congratulate you for your new task. Alam ko na tinanggap mo ang offered ni PNoy not for your papularity but to help thia new administration to re-store the true democracy of our beloved country.

    Good luck and may the Almighty God bless you, the president, the whole Aquino cabinet and the filipino people. Mabuhay ka Ricky……

  7. thelma
    July 11th, 2010 09:38
    7

    hi ricky,

    congratulations on your new appointment and good luck. i think you will need this as you enter the lion’s den. remain steadfast and true to what you are mandated to do.Next time you’re in this neck of the woods, drop in.

    thelma dumpit

  8. Chito Enrile Geronimo
    July 11th, 2010 10:36
    8

    Ricky,

    First of all congrats!

    Many may not have realized it, P-NOY proven he is not really “media savy” by getting you, among others, into his team!

    But rather, P-NOY is “COMMUNICATION savy,” and that’s a big difference! Pragmatically speaking, “media” is just a small component of COMMUNICATION.

    My few cents worth? P-NOY is not really concerned on the message transmission segment, or the outgoing message content, but rather, P-NOY is giving emphasis on the “receive” segment! This part of the communication process is P-NOY’s real leadership strength. He wants to know what his “BOSSES” are really saying!!!

    Are you guys “LISTENING?”

  9. GabbyD
    July 11th, 2010 16:17
    9

    congrats! i guess this means ur giving up the blog…

  10. coyote
    July 11th, 2010 20:33
    10

    What baffled me here is the role of Macky Hernandez. If he was the legal representative of Jesse, what was he doing all the time? It looks to me that despite Hernandez’s appointment as Jesse’s counsel, Roque was still calling the shots for Jesse. The question for the ethics committee would be what was Hernandez’s legal advice to Jesse? I would be interested to see the time line of the events, particularly from the time Hernandez was appointed as Jesse’s counsel. It seems clear that Roque’s actions from the time Jesse appeared show a lawyer-client relation existed between Jesse and Roque. Sure Roque will deny this. But he is probably aware that a lawyer-client relation need not be written. Most courts will judge the actions of a lawyer as a determining factor whether a lawyer-client existed. (here is a good read on this topic
    www.law.duke.edu/shell/cite.pl?49+Duke+L.+J.+147)

    Now it has come to “he says, she says”. And when lawyers become witnesses the fact just get muddled. I think the Philippine bar and the DOJ owe the public an explanation. Who was negligent? Who did not do their job? Whose actions caused Jesse life to be put in danger? Somehow, somebody has to be responsible for what happened to Jesse? What is clear is we have Philippine bar members who did not do their job diligently.

  11. coyote
    July 11th, 2010 20:37
    11

    How can Ricky deserve the appointment when he voted for Gibo haha!

    Congratulations Ricky!

    What I like about Ricky is he is a consummate professional. He also has no pride and his egos are grounded! Compare the guy to a Korina, to a Loren, to a Tulfo, journalists whose prides have grown to be as big as Mount Rushmore!

    Talking about Korina, somebody sent me this joke: “the biggest loser in the just concluded election was Korina. She has a loser for a husband, and president for an ex!”

  12. erni
    July 12th, 2010 05:09
    12

    ricky,

    it is refreshing to see young intelligent men like in government.

    you dont have to be the dragon slayer. just do what is right.

    congrstulation and good luck.

  13. Alice
    July 12th, 2010 17:49
    13

    Firstly,

    Firstly, many congratulations on being selected for this prestigious appointment. It is richly deserved. The President has made a good choice. Congratulations also on being awarded ‘Journalist of the Year’.

    I hope you don’t decide to ditch this blog, because, as Chito Enrile Geronimo so rightly observes, getting current feedback from the general public is a very important facet of your work in Government. Those of us who contribute regularly to the blog may vehemently disagree on occasions, but debate is nevertheless healthy in a democracy. At least the feedback comes from a broad cross section of people, both here and in America. So it could help you sound out the feelings of the public on specific issues.

    Best of luck in your new job.

  14. basketballer
    July 18th, 2010 17:16
    14

    JP Navera, what happened to you? Nag Ateneo Law ka panaman. tsk tsk.

  15. Pat
    July 20th, 2010 08:36
    15

    Ricky,

    In PNoy, we have hope. With you on board, we have better hope.

    Pat

  16. coyote
    July 20th, 2010 22:16
    16

    pat,

    I agree with you. I think pnoy is doing a great job. except for some little snags, he is setting a great example for filipinos. I am giving this administration a straight A by far.

    Ricky would be a great addition to the current administration. He is just too good to be used by ABS CBNS’s agenda of self promotion. I will hate to see Ricky doing a news item on Kris Aquino or an interview with other ABS-CBN “stars”, which will eventually happen if he does not get out of the company.

  17. Jonathan Aquino
    July 21st, 2010 20:32
    17

    I wrote an unpublished article three years where Harry Roque figures prominently. It’s called “The League of Extraordinary Filipinos” and I think that should tell that there are still young people who know a good man when they see one. Here’s the link in case you got intrigued — jonathan2rivers.blogspot.com/2009/04/league-of-extraordinary-filipino.html

  18. Ligaya Ferrer
    July 27th, 2010 05:57
    18

    Hello Ricky:

    Congratulation on your new joa as President Noy’s Communication Group (Sonny coloma, Manolo quezon and You).

    You guys did an excellent job in preparing Presient Noy’s SONA speech. It was direct to the point and prepared truthfully and professionally. Keep up the good work and help Pnoy fullfill his dreams to help filipino people.

    If I email you some concerns, will that message reach the President and I will get a response as constituent?

    thank-ligaya

  19. martin
    July 28th, 2010 01:02
    19

    rick,

    This was just the same thing what the late Pres. Secretary Tony Snow had been doing while he was still with Fox news channel, and prior when he became BUsh’s press. secretary..

  20. martin
    July 28th, 2010 01:08
    20

    keep it up rick… It feels so refreshing knowing someone like you, now is serving in a national executive level for the entire filipinos, of course with our new president… thank you

  21. Bem
    July 28th, 2010 21:24
    21

    Okay this may not be the right forum topic to say this. I just don’t know where to express my elation over the news. Just like most who posted here, Ricky CONGRATS!!!! I know it will be hard work for you. Just think about this, you’re doing this for all of us.

  22. coyote
    July 30th, 2010 00:18
    22

    Ricky you would not mind, but since you have access to the president. This is a suggestion that I thought worth considering.

    Instead of creating a Truth Commission, which every lawyer knows, has no judicial power, why not create an independent counsel.

    The truth commission will only serve one purpose and that is to shame the arroyo administration. An independent counsel has the all the powers of a public prosecutors. It can issue subpoena and file a case. The position has to be appointed by Delima. Since the position is under the Judiciary department, no statute from congress is required. Under the constitution, the Judiciary is a co-equal branch mandated to enforce the laws of the land. The appointment will also need not go through congress.

  23. marc1a
    July 30th, 2010 23:37
    23

    off-topic… but i just can’t help it spacer . . .

    sir:

    you always had my high respect. i am more than happy we have you now in government. with more good guys in office, we mere mortals are bound to sleep soundly at night (may i have your cape… security blanket? spacer . haha!

    seriously, there sure will be a lot of challenges… but hey you’ve been through worse and look at you… came out fine spacer

    we believe in you — in the quality of service you can and will deliver. we believe in the sincerity and competency of the current leadership (we have our very own obama =), we are regaining our trust in our institutions… truly we are inspired and energized to do even better by the positivity circling these days. ain’t it a miracle! Philippine renaissance, bring it on!

    Mabuhay po, Üncle! Godspeed!

  24. CONCERNED BBS EMPLOYEES
    August 6th, 2010 18:15
    24

    05 August 2010

    Hon. HERMINIO “SONNY” COLOMA

    Secretary

    Broadcast Communication Group

    Dear Sir:

    We concerned BBS employees are making ourselves as government’s feedback mechanism on fighting corruption particularly in PBS as President Noynoy’s aspiration. We want to inform you of rampant graft and corruption happened in the entire Bureau of Broadcast through the collusion of Dir. John S. Manalili and Deputy Director Monina Cespedes including all the Station Managers/OIC’s (DZRB, DZRM, DZSR, DWBR, and Radyo Pilipinas) of Philippine Broadcasting Service pertaining to use of airtime of Blocktimers without executing MOA or pertinent documents (known as verbal agreements) necessary before airing.

    Verbal agreements are blatantly continuing practiced by BBS management and even beseeched legal opinion to OSG to find justification of their illegal practices, but to no avail because OSG’s reply dated February 28 and June 6, 2008 respectively, remained firm that using government facilities and/or frequencies without imposing any conditionality or entering into verbal agreement is violative to BBS mandate and to accounting policies and regulations.

    The so-called “payola” is known by Blocktimers as airtime payment. To mention, one of many Blocktimers (in different PBS stations) are Arturo and Irma Lazo (a Gibo and Villar supporters), an opportunistic Blocktimers of DZRM benefitted by airing their commercial plugs illegally such PAGCOR (P10,000/mo.), PAGIBIG (P10,000/mo.) which according to COA can be categorized as one of the unrecognized income in DZRM as per 2009 COA Audit Observation Memorandum (please check and download at www.coa.gov.ph ANNUAL AUDIT REPORT CY 2009 OPS-BBS FULL REPORT). And according to source from DAR (their regular Saturday interview with former DAR Secretary Pangandaman, they’re collecting around P20,000- P 50,000.00 monthly)!!!?

    To date, Dir. John S. Manalili and Deputy Director Monina Cespedes for not strictly and consistently imposing the proper Policies and Guidelines in Using BBS Airtime as per Memorandum Order No. 009 Series 2007, a DZRM Station Manager Edgardo M. Satira was now on six (6) months preventive suspension without pay by the Office of the Ombudsman due to Grave Misconduct, Dishonesty; Conduct Prejudicial to the Best Interest of the Service-Administrative Case (OMB-C-A-09-0018-C) and OMB-C-C-09-0020-C, For Violation of Art. 15 & Art. 213 par. 1 of the RPC & Viol. Of Sec. 3(b) & (e) of RA 3019 (CRIMINAL CASE).

    Clearly, these illegal acts are PERSONAL FINANCIAL GAINS AND POLITICAL FAVORS which the common denominators of all these BBS Executives, which if only collections and exchange deals go directly to the National Treasury or in the Bureau, positive results may materialize on income from airtime payments which can buy new equipment, big savings will occur and CNA incentives will increase for BBS employees. Unfortunately, this will not happen as long as Dir Manalili and Dep. Dir. Cespedes remains in PBS-BBS. Thus, we are calling Secretary Herminio Coloma to boot out and replace a new appointed Director and Deputy Director by the President with the same principle “KUNG WALANG KORAP, WALANG MAHIRAP”.

    “ILANG SATIRA PA ANG TITIRA AT MANGUNGULEKTA NG BAYAD SA MGA BLOCKTIMERS PARA MAKAPAGPROGRAMA SA PBS? ISA NANG PINAKAMABIGAT NA EBIDENSYA ANG PANGUNGUNSINTI AT PAGHANAP NG PARAAN NA MAGING LEGAL ANG PAGPOPROGRAMA NG WALANG PAPELES NI DIR. MANALILI. MGA SAPAT NANG DAHILAN UPANG ANG PANGULONG NOYNOY AY AGARANG TANGGALIN SINA DIRECTOR JOHN S. MANALILI AT KAKUNTSABANG SI DEPUTY DIRECTOR MONINA CESPEDES SA KANILANG MGA KASALUKYANG POSISYON!!! TUNAY NA PAGBABAGO SA PBS GAWIN NA! ”

    One instance of political favors during the time of Gloria Administration, “para pumabor sa mga kalaban ni Pangulong Noynoy particular si Gibo”:

    “Isang maliwanag na pambababoy sa Pangulong Noynoy ilang araw na lang ang May 10 election, ipinadala si Grace Refama, reporter ng DZRB sa Anabels Restaurant para ikober ang Media Presscon na patawag ni Carmen “Chit” Pedrosa na mismong araw lang din nabuo ang grupo nila! Ang isyu, “Psychological or Mental State of Nonoy Aquino”. Ang kaganapan ito ay isinahimpapawid nationwide sa Radyo ng Bayan ng hapon sa oras mismo ng programa ni Togs Naniong.”

    PAANONG ANG ISANG DIRECTOR JOHN S. MANALILI AY MAGKAROON NG LAKAS NG LOOB NA SYA AY HUMILING AT LUMAPIT SA KASALUKUYANG PAMUNUAN NA SYA AY PANATILIHING MAGING DIRECTOR NG PBS GAYONG SYA MISMO ANG NAG-UTOS KAY OIC ALLAN ALLANIGUE NG DZRB NA ISAHIMPAPAWID NATIONWIDE ANG ISYUNG SISIRA SA PAGKATAO NG NANALONG PANGULONG NOYNOY? HINDI BA KAKAPALAN NG MUKHA ITO AT KATAKAWAN SA POSISYON!!!? SAPAGKAT TUMAYA AT SINUSUPORTAHAN NINA DIR. MANALILI AY ANG NATALONG “GIBO” COJUANGCO.

    If you need pertinent documents it can be sent to you via email in jpeg form or by fax.

    PAGBABAGO ANG SINABI NG PANGULONG NOYNOY SA KANYANG KAUNA-UNANG SONA KAYA PO SEC. HERMINIO “SONNY” COLOMA, TUNAY NA PAGBABAGO RIN NG PAMUNUAN NG PBS ANG AMING INAASAHAN, HIHINTAYIN AT PATULOY NA BABANTAYAN.

    Maraming salamat po,

    CONCERNED BBS EMPLOYEES

    Copy furnished:
    - President Benigno Simeon Aquino III
    - Secretary Ricky Carandang
    - Secretary Manuel L. Quezon III

  25. Ysh Tamano
    August 11th, 2010 15:03
    25

    Hey Bro! Congratulations!!! I’m happy for you and proud of you!

  26. Kier
    August 13th, 2010 07:52
    26

    I’m kinda off topic. But we need your help about the PDIC slow claims from the 12 closed legacy banks. Its almost 2 years but we haven’t heard from them. I do hope you can feature them or help us. Thanks!

  27. bangungut
    August 28th, 2010 12:31
    27

    Hey Ricky, What a big Flop you’ve made with the HK CEO’s call. Don’t call us, we call you… don’t do it next time dude, you’re not in ANC anymore.

  28. bangungut
    August 28th, 2010 21:16
    28

    Hey Ricky, my earlier post was deleted… did you? C’mon be sport.. It doesn’t tastes good when being criticized right? BUT you were so good in hitting government folks before at ANC and in this blog.

  29. bangungut
    August 28th, 2010 21:52
    29

    Oh it came back, gee.. Okay let me share with you a my story.. I am here in Beijing, China for a project. Wherever I go, I’m always proud to say, THAT I AM A FILIPINO. After last Monday’s fiasco? I guess you already know where I’m heading.. sleep tight dude.. GOOD JOB you did there.

  30. bangungut
    August 29th, 2010 10:25
    30

    You better resign from your job, Ricky. You proved yourself as unfit.

« Maguindanao Massacre Prosecutors Slam Harry Roque
Related searches:
secretary president public testimony because
gipoco.com is neither affiliated with the authors of this page nor responsible for its contents. This is a safe-cache copy of the original web site.