Firen Dreams |
Weaving texts and treacherous images :) |
thenintendard:
insanelygaming:
Donkey Kong: Pauline Edition
Mike Mika: My three year old daughter and I play a lot of old games together. Her favorite is Donkey Kong. Two days ago, she asked me if she could play as the girl and save Mario. She’s played as Princess Toadstool in Super Mario Bros. 2 and naturally just assumed she could do the same in Donkey Kong. I told her we couldn’t in that particular Mario game, she seemed really bummed out by that. So what else am I supposed to do?
Now I’m up at midnight hacking the ROM, replacing Mario with Pauline. I’m using the 2010 NES Donkey Kong ROM. I’ve redrawn Mario’s frames and I swapped the palettes in the ROM. I replaced the M at the top with a P for Pauline. Thanks to Kevin Wilson for giving me the lead on the tools and advice.
Download the DK patch here (XDelta & ROM needed)
(via it8bit)
(via itswalky)
underscorex:
ave-atque-vale:
foradayofsky:
marpotish:
phaelsafe:
Anita Sarkeesian faces backlash for disabling Youtube comments.
In celebration of International Women’s Day, people are taking to the Internet to complain about Anita Sarkeesian. The first installment of her long-awaited video series about sexism in video games was released yesterday, inspiring an inevitable torrent of backlash. Aside from suggestions that she “stole” the Kickstarter funding for the Women vs. Tropes in Video Games series, much of the criticism is because she disabled comments on the YouTube video.
[…]
Leading the charge against Sarkeesian’s decision is Tumblr user amazingatheist, who posted a ten-minute video entitled “Who’s The Damsel Now?“ Arguing that Sarkeesian’s “censorship” of YouTube comments counteracts her message about strong women, and that her TED talk about online harassment amounts to “whining,” amazingatheist says:
“What are you afraid of, Anita? Why can’t people have a discourse about your material? Why can’t people make their opinions towards your content known? I understand that some comments will be abusive in nature — probably most will — but so what?”
Ironically, the existence of this response means by definition that amazingatheist is making his opinion known, as well as participating in a discourse about Sarkeesian’s material. [READ MORE]
The amazingatheist destroyed his own chance at participating in these discussions by being a misogynistic MRA. Just in case, that link needs a trigger/content warning so TW: rape, misogyny, abusive language.
The woman got bombarded with rape and death threats when she talked about the idea of doing this series. And people are up in arms about her not wanting to deal with that during her actual work??
So aside from the misogyny aspect here (and that isn’t to downplay it at all, because holy fucking shit you ASSHOLES,) I would like to point out something that appears to be lost on 95% of the denizens of The Intertubes:
No one is required to let you air your opinion in their space.
This includes the comments section of anything they upload to YouTube.
Seriously, the number of people who think that they are somehow owed the right to comment on things boggles me. You want to bitch about someone’s videos, comment on news articles, disagree with someone’s Facebook post? Go do it in your space. No one owes you shit.
And in particular, no one you are abusive and violent toward owes you shit.I’m still boggling at this bit: “I understand that some comments will be abusive in nature — probably most will — but so what?”
Abusive in nature…but so what?
That comment says everything, doesn’t it?
After all, who fucking cares about what it’s like to receive death threats, rape threats? About what it’s like to have people barge into your space to pour violent, abusive vitriol all over your work? They are owed that opportunity, apparently. They are owed the opportunity to abuse you, and if you deny them that, you’re “censoring” them.
I would like everyone to think about that for a moment. @amazingatheist thinks it’s OK to threaten & abuse women he disagrees with - he’s done it himself, and he’s certainly never had any problem with anyone else doing it.
Abuse is OK. But protecting yourself from abuse? OH NO, CAN’T HAVE THAT.
What a shitstain.
Fuck “the amazing atheist” and all his fedora-clad MRA homies.
(Source: hellotailor, via itswalky)
True Story
(via sandybellido)
radiomaru:
Scott Pilgrim Vs The World: The Game
Wallace Wells + Online Play DLCIt’s finally coming…
PSN (North America): Tuesday
PSN (Europe): Wednesday
XBLA (worldwide): WednesdayIt looks like it’s $4.99 USD on PSN and I don’t know what that translates to in xbox points.
FAQ
Q: Why did they make DLC for this game over 2 years later?
A: i have no idea ha haQ: Why didn’t the game have online play to begin with?
A: It was a planned feature, but the budget was cut a few months into the project and online play was one of the features that had to be removed in order to finish the rest of the game. (There was lots of other stuff too… it was a bigger game. But that’s a story for another day.)Alright, have fun, and maybe we’ll play together soon!
[Disclaimer: I didn’t set the price for this, nor do I actually get paid for videogame sales, but I hope you enjoy it anyway. I will be paying for it myself :p]
Yay!
choochoobear:
A fast little watercolor before I go to bed.
Finally, my diploma arrived :D
girljanitor:
bashi-bazouk:
peppercyanide:
sisterwolf:
via
I never even
c
wow
How did they get away with that
AH
I LOVE THIS
What do you mean how did they get away with it?
History isn’t one straight line progressing towards a liberal society.
Look how much Americans attitudes have changed between 1980 and today. 1980 was the first time most very religious people voted, they abstained before that at the behest of their churches. Now they dictate policy at every election.
In my family photo album there are pictures from the 20s of a woman called ‘uncle bob’. She dressed in men’s clothing, and had a ‘companion’. This was a rough industrial town, they were working class, nobody cared. It was her business.
This is why politics is important - the moment you think everything is better today than it was in the past, you let other people take control of the direction society goes in - with you sitting back presuming we’re going forwards.
reblogging for the commentary
Agreed.
(via ryuuenx)
kasuminoneko:
aominecchi:
bossies:
www.mangapark.com/manga/koe-no-katachi
A comic about bullying that made me cry in the office this morning…
if you’ve not already read it, you should.
READ IT, DAMN IT!
Yes, it’s good stuff
mira @littlepurin XD
(Source: naminecchi, via kasuminoneko)
peterpayne:
Cutest dog ever.
Daniel Radcliffe talking about his old stunt double, David Holmes, who was severely injured during a stunt on the HP films