About these ads
← Men’s Rights Redditor: “If women want equal rights, they need to learn how to take a punch.”
A kitten, and a question: Are MRAs right about anything? →

I’m taking a break. So here’s a fantastic Bollywood dance number.

Mar 4

Posted by David Futrelle

spacer

 

Hey, everyone. So I sat down to write something about this horrific discussion of domestic violence on The Spearhead – which some of the Man Boobz commentariat have already started discussing here – and, well, I just couldn’t do it.

I need to step back a bit from this blog for a little while to clear my head and maintain my sanity. So I’m going to take a bit of a break – maybe just a few days, maybe a week – and post nothing but interesting videos and other things having nothing whatsoever to do with misogyny or the manosphere. You all, of course, can treat this any any other thread as a totally open thread to discuss whatever you want, including the regular Man Boobz topics of misogyny and general MRA shitlordery.

I’m going to start off with the dance number that first got me hooked on Bollywood music some years ago. This is from the 1998 film Dil Se, a drama about love and terrorism. But in Bollywood, even serious dramas have dance numbers, and Dil Se’s dance numbers are gorgeous and a little surreal.

The music from the film is by A.R. Rahman, a prolific and popular Bollywood music director best known in the US for doing the music for Slumdog Millionaire.

And  yes, that is Bollywood megastar Shah Rukh Khan dancing on top of a moving train without any safety harness or stunt double or CGI trickery. (Well, there are a couple of brief bits where a double might have been used.) Enjoy!

About these ads

Share this:

  • Twitter
  • Reddit
  • Facebook
  • Tumblr
  • Google
  • Email
  • More
  • StumbleUpon
  • Pinterest
  • Print

Posted on March 4, 2013, in announcements, vacation and tagged bollywood. Bookmark the permalink. 312 Comments.

← Men’s Rights Redditor: “If women want equal rights, they need to learn how to take a punch.”
A kitten, and a question: Are MRAs right about anything? →
  • Leave a comment

  • Comments 312

← Older Comments
  1. spacer Some Gal Not Bored at All | March 7, 2013 at 9:37 am

    @Marie

    I think this is the thread I started angsting on? Anyway, I actually did get around to talking to my dad today. It went better than I expected, but not amazing. Apparently he did try to talk to the therapist him and my mom were seeing about it before sending me to kiddie asylum and she was the one who recommended it. I’m no therapist, but it seemed hiiiiighllly unprofessional to try to diagnose someone w/o meeting them, so I would love to tell her off.

    First of all, way to go for bringing it up and trying to get answers! Agreed that diagnosing someone without seeing them is unprofessional. I know, from my own experience as a bipolar kid that they can be hard to deal with, but I am not sure that institutionalizing them is necessary unless they are a threat to themselves or others (same as adults). It sounded like you were very depressed and good help would have been nice for that, but I just think talking to someone and learning some CBT strategies would have met that. You got bad help, which is worse than no help at all.

    I am so sorry. I am not a fan of giving kids bipolar medications because, as Argenti said, they can be really dangerous and I also don’t think that kids are necessarily able to articulate how the drug makes them feel. Without having established that there is a way to communicate about the treatmment, there shouldn’t be treatment. (I am not saying to never give kids drugs, just teach them how to communicate about them or get to know the kid well enough to understand what they will try to tell you.) It doesn’t sound like you had any good follow-up care either.

    The whole thing sucks. I am sorry.

  2. spacer Some Gal Not Bored at All | March 7, 2013 at 9:42 am

    I should add that I don’t really support (forced) institutionalizing people for threat to self. Although, it seems better to do it to a child than an adult. I guess. Hmmm…
    Thoughts, Argenti?

    I feel lucky that my first suicide attempt when I was 13 didn’t result in commitment.

  3. spacer Marie | March 7, 2013 at 9:57 am

    @Argenti Aertheri

    Thanks for the info on meds. Sadly, now I’m even more curious XD

    Those quotes from your friend are very…strange. I hate to preach to the choir* but somehow it only ever seems like white, straight, cis guys who are convinced that inequality will be solved by money instead of addressing other issues. That may have made more sense in my head, after my brilliant plan of staying up too late last night I got up too early today. /trying to reset my schedule

    *I don’t actually hate this

  4. spacer howardbann1ster | March 7, 2013 at 10:00 am

    Some gal–

    I am not sure of your point with the churches in England. Because they did it, American churches shouldn’t? Because the KKK did it, it isn’t worth doing?

    Just the opposite. Not that it’s a useless gesture,
    but that they’ve already done it. How many press releases do we need now? How often?

    The Southern Baptists in America are about as homophobic as any mainstream church. They’ve had press releases condemning the WBC.

    But ignoring what they’ve already said or done, acting like they haven’t done it very much erases any hints of moderation.

    And I agree that Gene Robinson isn’t representative of the church. Like I said, my family is outraged that he’s dared to suggest god would be okay with gay people. They still think gay people are going to cause god to rain fire and brimstone on America. (just don’t call them homophobic–they hate that word. Their fears that being gay causes a pernicious god to harm America is TOTALLY LOGICAL, that’s all)

    But when you say ‘the church’ you lump Gene in with people who say he’s going to hell. That seems… well, wrong.

    As I alluded in my cryptic coda in my last post, I still have trouble with self-identification. I feel like a Christian, most the time. It’s hard to shed that, to stop wanting to defend it every time it’s under attack for doing something horrible, for being something horrible.

    And, of course, they more than manage to say and do enough horrible and shitty things on their own without being painted over with the WBC’s particular colors (why, hello there concerted attempts to keep Obamacare from paying for birth control! What an oddly BROAD coalition of religious folks you have lining up behind you!).

    Hell, I don’t even know anybody in meatspace I would call religious and moderate.

    But I think there’s ways to talk about the church in America without acting like Gene Robinson doesn’t exist.

  5. spacer Marie | March 7, 2013 at 10:04 am

    @some gal

    Thanks. Actually, in retrospect I think I was depressed, because my depression now seems to be the same when it’s acting up, at least with my being more likely to sleep a lot and not up for doing anything.

    I agree forced institutionalizing does seem slightly less skeevy for kids, since they have less experience to make decision about it. Still don’t like it :/ Though for me to have gotten actual treatment back then probably would have required both me and my parents have a much better line of communication.

    Sorry to hear about your suicide attempt :( (well, good that it didn’t end in institutionalization, but it must have been yucky to be going through that when you were 13)

  6. spacer howardbann1ster | March 7, 2013 at 10:20 am

    And, as a PS to that wall of text: I’ve been spending a lot of time lurking at Freethoughtblogs lately, simmering in atheism and trying to get a little more thought-out on the matter. And here is a pretty good critique of Gene Robinson’s book from those quarters.

    FWIW.

  7. spacer Some Gal Not Bored at All | March 7, 2013 at 10:30 am

    @howardbann1ster

    How many press releases do we need now? How often?

    Personally, every church that disagrees (although they could disagree as a group), every time the WBC makes an appearance, every time a sexual abuse scandal pops up. (The latter obviously should include their own efforts to prevent such occurrences and any possible coverups).

    After the first time, it is really easy to just send it out again. If every news story about something bad churches did opened with “15 of the area’s churches condemned the actions of _____, calling them _______” that would be great. I think it would show that they care about the image of “church,” that they are striving to meet the responsibilities that go along with their special place in society, that they care about their community.

    There just isn’t a critical mass and there should be, imo.

    When I met the boyfriend, he was a practicing Catholic. His mother still is. My grandparents are. While I was growing up, I attended a lot of different churches. I think they can all be better and should welcome feedback on how they look to the public. Most of the Christians I know care deeply about how their church looks to non-members. And most churches come off as though they don’t care or, rather, they care a lot that they be assumed good in all areaswithout doing the work to show it. If that reflects their membership, that’s fine, but I think that they do a disservice to the greater community they are part of.

    It is normally possible to criticize something without being part of it and without being assumed to hate it. That isn’t true of churches. I am not sure it is wrong to read that defensiveness as a desire to be treated as a distinguished entity while behaving in less that distinguished ways. There is a big difference between not being a member of something and finding that something alienating, I think.

    We get a lot of promotional matrial from churches and they (for the most part) attempt to distinguish their churches in the most euphemistic ways rather than confront the problems of other churches head-on. The few promos that do tend to be at the fundamentalist extreme. If the choices are euphemistic acceptance or direct non-acceptance, it isn’t surprising that “moderate” isn’t what I take away. I take away extremism and cowardice as characterizing churches in the United States. I think the moderates erase themselves.

  8. spacer Some Gal Not Bored at All | March 7, 2013 at 10:43 am

    @Marie

    Thanks. Depression is mostly the same for me. When I was younger there was a lot of crying and wishing for a boyfriend who would magically fix everything. Thankfully, I grew out of that without a test run that would have at best ended really badly.

    I don’t know if this matters, but I think you are younger than I am (from the math), and my early twenties were mostly learning about myself and my depression and getting better at consistently deploying healthy(ish) strategies for coping with my ups and downs. Sometimes, stuff just gets a little easier to deal with with practice. (Not that you might not need professional treatment now or in the future and there is nothing wrong with getting it or weak about you if you need it, but sometimes time just helps on its own.) FWIW, I would make sure you talk about your awful childhood experience early if you start therapy. Not so you can feel better about it, although you might, but because it should have an effect on how the therapist approaches treating you. (And if it doesn’t, the therapist might not be very good.) I’ve had a lot of bad experiences and I open with that because it has made me a bit…resistant to treatment. If a doctor or therapist doesn’t seem to care, they suck. Easy test!

  9. spacer Some Gal Not Bored at All | March 7, 2013 at 10:47 am

    @howardbann1ster

    Thanks for the link. It is actually a book I considered getting, but put off (so who knows if I’ll end up picking it up) so I am very interested and would like something to determine if I should revisit the purchasing it decision.

    FWIW, the boyfriend really loves Rob Bell’s stuff and so I’ve gotten some of it first-hand and a lot of it second-hand. That is another moderate voice that represents a larger Christian coalition. (Of course, from my perspective, he seems to be involved in a dialogue over the direction the church will take so there isn’t necessarily a winner yet.)

  10. spacer Marie | March 7, 2013 at 10:56 am

    @some gal

    Thanks for the advice :) tbh, I would like to see a therapist, but I’m anticipating many, many misses, so I need to wait until me and my mom have money for it (though I think she was going to check if her insurance covered anything).

    I tried talking to the therapist my sister sees (who sees people w/o charge for one day a week) but alas, I could not stand him.

    I’m definitely younger than you :) I have yet to hit my early twenties.

gipoco.com is neither affiliated with the authors of this page nor responsible for its contents. This is a safe-cache copy of the original web site.