« | Main | Perdue remains down to McCrory by 10, would romp Faison »

December 09, 2011

McCrory, Marriage Amendment Running Ahead

Bev Perdue appears to have been relatively unaffected by the indictments last week of 3 people associated with her 2008 campaign. She trails Pat McCrory by 10 points this month, 50-40. That's only a point worse than she was doing on our last poll, when the deficit was 48-39. Her approval numbers have pretty much stayed in place as well. 37% of voters approve of the job she's doing to 48% who disapprove. In late October she stood at 38% approval with 50% of voters disapproving.

Bill Faison, whose recent public statements have sparked speculation about a Gubernatorial campaign, trails McCrory by an even wider 21 point margin at 47-26.  Most of the discourse about the Governor's race relates to Perdue being particularly weak, but just as important a dynamic is that McCrory is unusually strong. 41% of voters in the state have a favorable opinion of him to 28% with a negative one.  Those are far superior numbers to what any other major North Carolina politician has right now.

In addition to being popular with Republicans, independents with an opinion about him break more than 2:1 favorable (38/16), and even 25% of Democrats see him positively. McCrory would defeat pretty much any Democrat in North Carolina next year unless he's significantly cut down to size. Running someone else instead of Perdue is not some magical solution to the Democrats' problems.

Faison's recent statements appear to have antagonized Democrats in the state. Only 7% have a positive opinion of him to 31% with an unfavorable one. And Perdue would crush him in a primary, leading 55-23.

Perdue's numbers obviously continue to be very weak, but the good news for her at least is that the indictments last week didn't cause the bottom to fall out.

The story with the marriage amendment in North Carolina continues to be the same month after month: voters overwhelmingly support it but a majority of them also support civil unions, suggesting they might not be fully aware of how far the proposal goes. 58% say they'll vote for the amendment to 32% who are opposed. It has overwhelming support from Republicans (77/16), majority support from independents (52/35), and even plurality support from Democrats (47/43).

At the same time 56% of voters in the state support either gay marriage (27%) or civil unions (29%) with only 40% thinking there should be absolutely no legal recognition for same sex couples.  About 20% of North Carolinians support legal recognition for gays and plan to vote for the marriage amendment. Getting those folks to change their minds will be the key for those hoping to defeat it.

Full results here

Posted by Tom Jensen at 11:09 AM in Blog, Gay marriage, Governor 2012, North Carolina, Pat McCrory | Permalink

Reblog (0) | | Digg This | Save to del.icio.us | |

Comments

spacer You can follow this conversation by subscribing to the comment feed for this post.

spacer

The fact that 65% of respondents 18-29 said they plan to vote for the amendment seems to fly in the face of the evidence that younger voters are more supportive of gay rights in general and gay marriage in particular. They even have a higher rate than those over 65. That seems highly suspect to me.

Posted by: gaylib | December 09, 2011 at 04:42 PM

spacer

NC is not NY, gaylib. According to the CNN exit poll, 51% of voters 18-29 in FL voted for the amendment there in 2008- and NC is more conservative than FL. It is probably not 65%, but it could easily be 60% or 55%.

Posted by: Mike P. | December 09, 2011 at 07:42 PM

spacer

I live in NC, Mike. I know how conservative it is, and believe it or not, NC is not nearly as conservative as Florida. That number just doesn't make sense.

Posted by: gaylib | December 10, 2011 at 10:03 AM

spacer

You also have the fact that the margin of error on young folks in the primary sample is AT LEAST 10.8%, probably higher. So it could theoretically be less than 55% in the actual population, and probably is.

Posted by: Dustin Ingalls | December 10, 2011 at 12:21 PM

spacer

I would also question your sample as far as what you expect as the makeup of voters for a primary which will only be for a Republican candidate (and one where the candidate is almost assuredly going to be a foregone conclusion at that point). Do you really think 47% of the voters will be Democrats? or that 20% will be African Americans? maybe in a general election (and I understand you were polling for Perdue/McCrory too), but in this case, with nothing else on the ballot, I highly doubt it.

Posted by: gaylib | December 11, 2011 at 08:06 AM

spacer

I don't live in NC, so I do not doubt that you are more familiar with the state than I. All I will say is that by most measures -CNN exit polls, Gallup polls, 2008 election results, etc.- NC is more conservative than FL. Also, a much larger portion of the Democratic vote in NC is black as compared to the Democratic vote in Florida, and there is no reason to think that black voters in NC will vote differently on this issue than black voters elsewhere.
NC is also much more religious than FL. Nate Silver (among others) has demonstrated that importance of religion is the variable most closely correlated with support for a marriage amendment.

As for the youth vote, I doubt very much that many young folks will be showing up for the primary vote, and doubt even more that the election will come down to them. Young voters just do not vote as much as other groups. This was true even in 2008 and is truer in low-turnout elections. I will also say that young voters are not going to vote monolithically (i.e. 70%+) against the measure, which would seem to be necessary to defeat it.

Finally, it is no secret that support for marriage amendments has been chronically underestimated by polls by about seven points (see the work of Patrick Egan on that). By contrast, the level of opposition measured in polls is usually about right.

Posted by: Mike P. | December 11, 2011 at 08:35 PM

spacer

Gaylib,

If you think we have too many Democrats and that our young people are too conservative, maybe those two things will just balance each other out and the poll will be just right.

Posted by: Tom Jensen | December 12, 2011 at 07:59 AM

spacer

@Tom--didn't expect my rather pertinent questions to be met with such dismissive, nasty sarcasm. If your profesionalism is any indication of your polls trustworthiness, than I'd say it isn't worth the pixels on the screen. I won't even bother reading next time.

Posted by: gaylib | December 12, 2011 at 11:02 AM

spacer

Gaylib, the demographic information was for the general election numbers. But even still, at this point we do have more people saying they'll vote in the Democratic primary next May than the GOP one.

Mike P: Our polling on the Maine referendum in 2009 was deadly accurate, and we generally are finding less support for gay marriage than other pollsters, due to the lowered social desirability bias of respondents feeling their answers are more anonymous when given to a recording than a live person.

Posted by: Dustin Ingalls | December 12, 2011 at 02:46 PM

spacer

On the 18-29 cohort, the issue isn't the absolute level of support or opposition to SSM; it is the support level relative to the other age groups. If the 18-29 cohort comes in as more anti-SSM than the older groups that would be a red flag, as it would fly in the face of every other poll ever taken on this issue. Even the 2008 CNN exit poll from FL mentioned above bears this out, as the younger cohort while supporting the amendment, had support running 12% below FL voters as a whole.

So whether the poll shows the 18-29 group in NC supporting the amendment by 45, 55, or 65%, none of these results would be an indicator of inaccuracy. But if the poll shows the 18-29 group supporting it at a level greater than the 50+ group(s), that may suggest that something is screwy with the poll.

Finally, I have a hard time believing that the turnout in NC in May 2012 is going to resemble the general election. That having been said, PPP is very good at polling on this issue and I hesitate to dismiss this poll on that basis.

Has PPP ever polled on an initiative or referendum that was slated to appear on the ballot on a state primary day?

Posted by: Gerald | December 12, 2011 at 08:05 PM

spacer

A lot of factors will have to be accounted for over time, such as if the Republicans have a presidential nominee before the NC primaries, because if that is the case then i think these numbers will be fair, but if NC is a game changer for the GOPs then opponents of the amendment have little to no chance of generating the amount of turnout needed to dismiss this awful amendment.

Posted by: Kevin Wood | December 13, 2011 at 02:04 PM

Verify your Comment

Previewing your Comment

Posted by:  | 

This is only a preview. Your comment has not yet been posted.

spacer
Your comment could not be posted. Error type:
Your comment has been saved. Comments are moderated and will not appear until approved by the author. Post another comment

The letters and numbers you entered did not match the image. Please try again.

As a final step before posting your comment, enter the letters and numbers you see in the image below. This prevents automated programs from posting comments.

Having trouble reading this image? View an alternate.

spacer

Post a comment

Comments are moderated, and will not appear until the author has approved them.

PPP POLLS BY YEAR: 2006-2013

spacer

Search

CONTACT US

Public Policy Polling
2912 Highwoods Blvd., Suite 201
Raleigh, NC 27604
Phone: 888.621.6988

Questions or Comments?
Email Us

TESTIMONIALS

spacer Public Policy Polling was profiled by NPR as “one of the most prolific polling outfits in the country.” Read more...

The Wall Street Journal ranked PPP as one of the top swing state pollsters in the country during the last Presidential election.

spacer

RECENT POSTS

FeedWind

Categories

  • Al Franken
  • Alabama
  • Alaska
  • Alison Lundergan Grimes
  • Amy Klobuchar
  • Andrew Cuomo
  • Arizona
  • Arkansas
  • Barack Obama
  • Barbara Boxer
  • baseball
  • Bill Cassidy
  • Bill Clinton
  • Bill Nelson
  • Blog
  • Bob Casey
  • Bob McDonnell
  • Bobby Jindal
  • Brian Sandoval
  • Brian Schweitzer
  • Bruce Braley
  • California
gipoco.com is neither affiliated with the authors of this page nor responsible for its contents. This is a safe-cache copy of the original web site.