FurMark Scores, Comparative Charts (v1.9, 1.10, 1.13, 1.14)
- Page 1: 1920×1080 scores
- Page 2: 1280×720 scores
- Page 3: 1280×1024 scores
Update: 2014.11.10
Preset:1080
– MSI Radeon R9 920X Gaming 4G
Update: 2014.09.24
Preset:1080
– GeForce GTX TITAN Black
– GeForce GTX TITAN
– GIGABYTE BRIX GTX 760
Here are the charts of FurMark scores for AMD Radeon and NVIDIA GeForce graphics cards (and Intel HD Graphics GPUs as well). These scores can be used as reference for checking your FurMark score with FurMark 1.9.x and FurMark 1.10.x (will be released shortly, currently in testing…). Each entry includes the model of the graphics card with clock speeds, the TPC (Total Power Consumption) of the X58 testbed at idle and under full load, the max GPU temperature and the graphics driver version.
FurMark is an OpenGL 2 benchmark. Almost all existing graphics cards can be benchmarked with FurMark: GeForce 6 / 7/ 8 / 9 / GTX200 / GTX400 / GTX500 / GTX600, Radeon X1900 / HD2000 / HD3000 / HD4000 / HD5000 / HD6000 / HD7000, Intel HD Graphics 2000 / 3000 / 4000.
These charts will be updated as regularly as possible with new graphics cards or new graphics drivers (only if there are significant changes in performance).
Three kind of scores are available on these charts:
- Preset:1080: 1920×1080 fullscreen, 0X MSAA, 60 seconds, dynamic background, burn-in mode checked in the Settings box
- Preset:720: 1280×720 fullscreen, 0X MSAA, 60 seconds, dynamic background, burn-in mode checked in the Settings box
- Custom preset: 1280×1024 fullscreen, 0X MSAA, 60 seconds, dynamic background, burn-in mode checked in the Settings box
1 – Preset:1080
Settings: Preset:1080 (1920×1080 fullscreen, 0X MSAA, 60 seconds, dynamic background, burn-in test mode)
Other scores can be found online in FurMark GPU Database section.
| - MSI R9 290X Gaming 4G (default clock speeds), Catalyst 14.9 WHQL (Win8 64-bit) – PowerTune: +20% - 4922 points (82 FPS) |
| - Sapphire Radeon HD 6970 CF (GPU@880MHz, mem@1375MHz, max GPU temp:78°C, two GPUs / CrossFire ON), TPC: 87W(PSU1) + 33W(PSU2) /430W(PSU1) + 240W(PSU2) (on H67 testbed v2), Catalyst 12.3 whql (Win 7 64-bit) - 4704 points (78 FPS), PowerTune: +20% |
| - MSI R9 290X Gaming 4G (default clock speeds), Catalyst 14.9 WHQL (Win8 64-bit) – PowerTune: 0% - 4577 points (76 FPS) |
| - NVIDIA GeForce GTX TITAN Black (default clock speeds), R340.11 (Win8.1 64-bit) - 4245 points (70 FPS) |
| - NVIDIA GeForce GTX TITAN (default clock speeds), R340.11 (Win8.1 64-bit) - 4088 points (68 FPS) |
| - EVGA GeForce GTX 780 (default clock speeds), R331.40 (Win8 64-bit) - 4083 points (68 FPS) |
| - Sapphire Radeon HD 6970 CF (GPU@880MHz, mem@1375MHz, max GPU temp:78°C, two GPUs / CrossFire ON), TPC: 87W(PSU1) + 33W(PSU2) /352W(PSU1) + 176W(PSU2) (on H67 testbed v2), Catalyst 12.3 whql (Win 7 64-bit) - 3505 points (58 FPS), PowerTune: 0% |
| - MSI Radeon HD 7970 (GPU@925MHz, mem@1375MHz, max GPU temp:68°C), TPC:105W/383W, Catalyst 12.3 whql (Win 7 64-bit) - 3363 points (56 FPS), PowerTune: +20% |
| - MSI Radeon HD 7970 (GPU@925MHz, mem@1375MHz, max GPU temp:79°C), TPC:75W/346W (on H67 testbed), Catalyst 12.3 whql (Win 7 64-bit) - 3361 points (56 FPS), PowerTune: +20% |
| - EVGA GeForce GTX 680 (GPU@1005MHz, mem@3004MHz, max GPU temp:74°C), TPC:101W/312W, GPU power: 115% TDP, R301.24 beta (branch r301_07-12, Win 7 64-bit) - 2699 points (44 FPS) |
| - MSI Radeon HD 7970 (GPU@925MHz, mem@1375MHz, max GPU temp:76°C), TPC:75W/280W (on H67 testbed), Catalyst 12.3 whql (Win 7 64-bit) - 2582 points (43 FPS), PowerTune: 0% |
| - MSI Radeon HD 7970 (GPU@925MHz, mem@1375MHz, max GPU temp:68°C), TPC:105W/339W, Catalyst 12.3 whql (Win 7 64-bit) - 2582 points (43 FPS), PowerTune: 0% |
| - EVGA GeForce GTX 580 Classified Ultra (GPU@900MHz, mem@2106MHz, max GPU temp:87°C), TPC:116W/530W, R301.24 beta (branch r301_07-12, Win 7 64-bit) - 2403 points (40 FPS) |
| - Sapphire Radeon HD 6970 (GPU@880MHz, mem@1375MHz, max GPU temp:78°C), TPC:78W/352W (on H67 testbed), Catalyst 12.3 whql (Win 7 64-bit) - 2402 points (40 FPS), PowerTune: +20% |
| - EVGA GeForce GTX 580 SC (GPU@797MHz, mem@2025MHz, max GPU temp:91°C), TPC:85W/452W (on H67 testbed), R263.09 whql (branch r260_uda_final-58, Win 7 64-bit) - 2144 points (35 FPS) |
| - MSI GeForce GTX 660 Hawk (default clock speeds), R327.24 (Win7 64-bit) - 2142 points (35 FPS) |
| - MSI Radeon HD 5770 Hawk CF (GPU@875MHz, mem@1200MHz, max GPU temp:69°C, two GPUs / CrossFire ON), TPC:120W/350W, Catalyst 12.3 whql (Win 7 64-bit) - 2135 points (35 FPS) |
| - AMD Radeon HD 5870 (GPU@850MHz, mem@1200MHz, max GPU temp:84°C), TPC:102W/320W, Catalyst 12.3 whql (Win 7 64-bit) - 2130 points (35 FPS) |
| - MSI GeForce GTX 580 Lightning (GPU@772MHz, mem@2004MHz, max GPU temp:97°C), TPC:125W/564W, R263.09 whql (branch r260_uda_final-58, Win 7 64-bit) - 2077 points (34 FPS) |
| - Sapphire Radeon HD 5850 (GPU@765MHz, mem@1125MHz, max GPU temp:66°C), TPC:110W/276W, Catalyst 12.3 whql (Win 7 64-bit) - 1805 points (30 FPS) |
| - Sapphire Radeon HD 6970 (GPU@880MHz, mem@1375MHz, max GPU temp:78°C), TPC:78W/286W (on H67 testbed), Catalyst 12.3 whql (Win 7 64-bit) - 1776 points (29 FPS), PowerTune: 0% |
| - EVGA GeForce GTX 480 (GPU@700MHz, mem@1848MHz, max GPU temp:89°C), TPC:105W/405W (on H67 testbed), R296.10 whql (branch r295_43-27, Win 7 64-bit) - 1758 points (29 FPS) |
| - EVGA GeForce GTX 295 CO-OP (GPU@576MHz, mem@1008MHz, max GPU temp:73°C, two GPUs enabled / SLI ON), TPC:130W/414W, R301.24 beta (branch r301_07-12, Win 7 64-bit) - 1754 points (29 FPS) |
| - Sapphire Radeon HD 6870 (GPU@900MHz, mem@1050MHz, max GPU temp:82°C), TPC:104W/277W, Catalyst 12.3 whql (Win 7 64-bit) - 1668 points (27 FPS) |
| - MSI GeForce GTX 470 (GPU@607MHz, mem@1674MHz, max GPU temp:93°C), TPC:124W/347W, R296.10 whql (branch r295_43-27, Win 7 64-bit) - 1424 points (23 FPS) |
| - GIGABYTE BRIX GTX 760 (default clock speeds), R340.76 (Win 8.1 64-bit) - 1409 points (23 FPS) |
| - ASUS GeForce GTX 750 (default clock speeds, max GPU temp:51°C), R340.65 (Win 8.1 64-bit) - 1339 points (22 FPS) |
| - MSI GTX 460 Cyclone 768D5/OC (GPU@729MHz, mem@1804MHz, max GPU temp:67°C), TPC:100W/268W, R301.24 beta (branch r301_07-12, Win 7 64-bit) - 1187 points (19 FPS) |
| - MSI Radeon HD 5770 Hawk (GPU@875MHz, mem@1200MHz, max GPU temp:68°C), TPC:110W/224W, Catalyst 12.3 whql (Win 7 64-bit) - 1078 points (17 FPS) |
| - ASUS Radeon HD 7770 DirectCU TOP (GPU@1120MHz, mem@1150MHz, max GPU temp:59°C), TPC:75W/182W, Catalyst 12.3 whql (Win 7 64-bit) - 1036 points (17 FPS) |
| - MSI GeForce GTX 580 Lightning (GPU@772MHz, mem@2004MHz, max GPU temp:72°C), TPC:133/374W, R296.10 whql (branch r295_43-27, Win 7 64-bit) - 1025 points (17 FPS) – GPU is throttled down (at 192MHz with R296.10, R301.24)! |
| - EVGA GeForce GTX 280 (GPU@601MHz, mem@1107MHz, max GPU temp:79°C, TPC:125W/322W), R301.24 beta (branch r301_07-12, Win 7 64-bit) - 919 points (15 FPS) |
| - EVGA GeForce GTX 295 CO-OP (GPU@576MHz, mem@1008MHz, max GPU temp:71°C, one GPU enabled / SLI OFF, TPC:130W/294W), R301.24 beta (branch r301_07-12, Win 7 64-bit) - 879 points (14 FPS) |
| - MSI GeForce GTX 260 (GPU@621MHz, mem@1080MHz, max GPU temp:68°C), R301.24 beta (branch r301_07-12, Win 7 64-bit) - 739 points (12 FPS) |
| - MSI Radeon HD 4850 Hybrid Frozr (GPU@640MHz, mem@993MHz, max GPU temp:82°C), TPC:112W/194W, Catalyst 12.3 whql (Win 7 64-bit) - 577 points (9 FPS) (GPU throttled down by Catalyst?) |
| - HIS Radeon HD 3870 (GPU@777MHz, mem@1126MHz, max GPU temp:93°C), TPC:105W/230W, Catalyst 12.3 whql (Win 7 64-bit) - 576 points (9 FPS) |
| - AMD A10-7850K (Radeon R7, default clock speeds, RAM: DDR3 @ 2400MHz), Catalyst 14.4 WHQL (Win 8 64-bit) - 487 points (8 FPS) |
| - NVIDIA GeForce 8800 GTX (GPU@576MHz, mem@900MHz, max GPU temp:77°C), TPC:133W/261W, R296.10 whql (branch r295_43-27, Win 7 64-bit) - 481 points (8 FPS) |
| - Intel Graphics HD 5000 (Microsoft Surface PRO 3) - 434 points (7 FPS) |
| - ASUS GeForce 7950 GX2 (GPU@500MHz, mem@600MHz, max GPU temp:95°C, two GPUs enabled / SLI ON), TPC:128W/249W, R296.10 whql (branch r295_43-27, Win 7 64-bit) - 415 points (6 FPS) |
| - Zotac GeForce GT 240 (GPU@550MHz, mem@790MHz, max GPU temp:65°C), TPC:88W/144W, R296.10 whql (branch r295_43-27, Win 7 64-bit) - 356 points (5 FPS) |
| - MSI GeForce 9600 GT Diamond (GPU@650MHz, mem@850MHz, max GPU temp:46°C), R301.24 beta (branch r301_07-12, Win 7 64-bit) - 349 points (5 FPS) |
| - AMD A10-7850K (Radeon R7, default clock speeds, RAM: DDR3 @ 1600MHz), Catalyst 14.4 WHQL (Win 8 64-bit) - 335 points (5 FPS) |
| - ASUS GeForce 7950 GX2 (GPU@500MHz, mem@600MHz, max GPU temp:84°C, one GPU enabled / SLI OFF), TPC:128W/201W, R296.10 whql (branch r295_43-27, Win 7 64-bit) - 208 points (3 FPS) |
| - ASUS Radeon HD 2400 (GPU@525MHz, mem@400MHz, max GPU temp:40°C), TPC:80W/117W, Catalyst 12.3 whql (Win 7 64-bit) - 41 points (1 FPS) |
- Page 1: 1920×1080 scores
- Page 2: 1280×720 scores
- Page 3: 1280×1024 scores
Pages: 1 2 3
Tweet Follow @Geeks3D -->
↑ Grab this Headline Animator
112 Comments [Comments are now closed for this post] 1,093,562 views Posted by JeGX - 2012/04/13 at 16:06
Categories: Benchmarks, FurMark Tags: benchmark, chart, comparative, comparison, furmark, gpu, graphics card, opengl, score, stress test, table, video card
112 Responses to “FurMark Scores, Comparative Charts (v1.9, 1.10, 1.13, 1.14)”
Newer Comments »
-
samsi suardi says: 2012/04/14 at 13:21
Why u no include radeon 7970?
-
JeGX says: 2012/04/14 at 13:24
In few moments I hope, the HD 7970 will be benchmarked. Currently I’m benchmarking the HD 6970 but I have some problems with my X58 testbed.