Selected works by recent participants

Justin Sytsma, "Revisiting the Valence Account" (2013)

Adam Arico with Phelan and Nichols, "Thinking Things and Feeling Things: On an Alleged Discontinuity in Folk Metaphysics of Mind" (2013)

Genoveva Marti, "Against Semantic Multiculturalism" (2009)

Edouard Machery with Mallon, Nichols, and Stich, "Semantics, Cross-Cultural Style" (2004)

Gregg Caruso, Free Will and Consciousness: A Determinist Account of Free Will (2012)

Neil Levy, Consciousness and Moral Responsibility (2014)

Categories

  • Aesthetics
  • Applied Ethics
  • Christmas
  • Environmental Ethics
  • Epistemology
  • Formal epistemology
  • Logic
  • meta-metaphysics
  • Metaethics
  • Metaphysics
  • Methodology
  • Moral psychology
  • Normative ethics
  • Online undergrad philosophy conference
  • Pedagogy
  • Philosophy of Action
  • Philosophy of Biology
  • Philosophy of Language
  • Philosophy of Mind
  • Philosophy of Physics
  • Philosophy of Psychology
  • Philosophy of Science
  • Political Philosophy
  • Reproductive Rights
  • The Profession
  • Uncategorized
  • Value Theory
  • x-phi
buy soma onlinebuy meridia online
« Owen Flanagan and Alex Rosenberg  
  Matt Bedke and Walter Sinnott-Armstrong »

Jason Brennan and Kevin Vallier

September 18th, 2011

Jason Brennan (left) and Kevin Vallier (right) on political liberalism and religion.

According to some prominent versions of political liberalism, coercive political force is illegitimate unless it is justifiable from every reasonable point of view. But there are many reasonable points of view from which religious beliefs cannot be justified. This seems to mean that religious political convictions are in conflict with political liberalism. However, Vallier resists that conclusion; he thinks that religious reasoning can have a legitimate role in political discourse. In this episode, Brennan and Vallier discuss Vallier’s argument.

Related works

by Brennan:
The Ethics of Voting (2011)
“The Right to a Competent Electorate” (forthcoming)

by Vallier:
“Liberalism, Religion, and Integrity” (forthcoming)
“Convergence and Consensus in Public Reason” (forthcoming)
with Gerald Gaus: “The Roles of Religious Conviction in a Publicly Justified Polity: The Implications of Convergence, Asymmetry and Political Institutions” (2009)

« Owen Flanagan and Alex Rosenberg  
  Matt Bedke and Walter Sinnott-Armstrong »

8 comments to Jason Brennan and Kevin Vallier

  • NChen
    September 20, 2011 at 7:51 pm · Reply

    Brennan at one point near the beginning says something like liberal values are an extension of religious values of equality. I’m not a historian of ideas but that seems to me to be false. In some sense wasn’t the opposite the truth? Liberalism was a reaction towards the state imposing religious values on people against their choices.

  • David Hamstra
    September 20, 2011 at 9:44 pm · Reply

    NChen,

    One of my former profs did a dissertation at Notre Dame on the topic of Protestant influences on freedom of religion (see his synopsis here). That would be one instance of a liberal value coming from a religious one.

gipoco.com is neither affiliated with the authors of this page nor responsible for its contents. This is a safe-cache copy of the original web site.