Federal Trade Commission Updates Online Privacy Rules For Pre-Teens

By David Bruggeman | Published: December 21, 2012

On Wednesday the Federal Trade Commission (FTC) announced the final updated rules for implementing the Children’s Online Privacy Protection Act (COPPA). Passed in 1998, COPPA rules had not been updated to reflect changes in technology, most notably the rise of mobile internet access and mobile applications. The final rules will take effect on July 1, 2013.

A fundamental difference between 1998 and now is that information is not just collected through active visitor input, but can also be gathered without conscious knowledge of the visitor. As the FTC describes it, the changes in the rule will help address this change in online behavior and other notable differences in how kids operate online. The Commission has conducted two separate studies on mobile apps and kids, which inform the new rules. These rules will do the following:

  • modify the list of “personal information” that cannot be collected without parental notice and consent, clarifying that this category includes geolocation information, photographs, and videos;
  • offer companies a streamlined, voluntary and transparent approval process for new ways of getting parental consent;
  • close a loophole that allowed kid-directed apps and websites to permit third parties to collect personal information from children through plug-ins without parental notice and consent;
  • extend coverage in some of those cases so that the third parties doing the additional collection also have to comply with COPPA;
  • extend the COPPA Rule to cover persistent identifiers that can recognize users over time and across different websites or online services, such as IP addresses and mobile device IDs;
  • strengthen data security protections by requiring that covered website operators and online service providers take reasonable steps to release children’s personal information only to companies that are capable of keeping it secure and confidential;
  • require that covered website operators adopt reasonable procedures for data retention and deletion; and
    strengthen the FTC’s oversight of self-regulatory safe harbor programs.


Responses to the rule changes are mixed. App developers and other industry groups see the rules as stifling innovation, in part because companies may opt not to serve kids rather than develop content for those under 13 and comply with the associated rules. Some supporters of the new rules have expressed concern that parts of the new rules are vague on exactly who must comply under certain circumstances.

Lawmakers have been generally supportive, in part because the revised COPPA rules signify forward motion in updating privacy laws – something Congress has had trouble achieving. Representatives Markey and Barton intend to reintroduce privacy legislation that would effectively expand COPPA through age 15. And it may be that if broad-based privacy legislation ever becomes law, it will be informed by how well COPPA and related legislation work (or don’t) in preserving the privacy of children.

This entry was posted in Privacy and Security. Bookmark the permalink. Comments are closed, but you can leave a trackback: Trackback URL.
  • Categories

    • Accessibility
    • ACM/USACM News
    • Digital Government
    • E-voting
    • Education and Workforce
    • Events
    • Innovation
    • Intellectual Property
    • Miscellaneous
    • Privacy and Security
    • Web Accessibility
  • RSS Feed

    Subscribe to our posts

  • Archives

    • April 2015
    • March 2015
    • February 2015
    • January 2015
    • December 2014
    • November 2014
    • October 2014
    • September 2014
    • August 2014
    • July 2014
    • June 2014
    • May 2014
    • April 2014
    • March 2014
    • February 2014
    • January 2014
    • December 2013
    • November 2013
    • October 2013
    • September 2013
    • August 2013
    • July 2013
    • June 2013
    • May 2013
    • April 2013
    • March 2013
    • February 2013
    • January 2013
    • December 2012
    • September 2012
    • July 2012
    • June 2012
    • May 2012
    • April 2012
    • March 2012
    • February 2012
    • January 2012
    • December 2011
    • November 2011
    • October 2011
    • September 2011
    • August 2011
    • July 2011
    • June 2011
    • May 2011
    • April 2011
    • March 2011
    • February 2011
    • January 2011
    • December 2010
    • November 2010
    • October 2010
    • September 2010
    • August 2010
    • July 2010
    • June 2010
    • May 2010
    • April 2010
    • March 2010
    • February 2010
    • January 2010
    • December 2009
    • November 2009
    • October 2009
    • September 2009
    • August 2009
    • July 2009
    • June 2009
    • May 2009
    • April 2009
    • March 2009
    • February 2009
    • January 2009
    • December 2008
    • November 2008
    • October 2008
    • September 2008
    • August 2008
    • July 2008
    • June 2008
    • May 2008
    • April 2008
    • March 2008
    • February 2008
    • January 2008
    • December 2007
    • November 2007
    • October 2007
    • September 2007
    • August 2007
    • July 2007
    • June 2007
    • May 2007
    • April 2007
    • March 2007
    • February 2007
    • January 2007
    • December 2006
    • November 2006
    • October 2006
    • September 2006
    • August 2006
    • July 2006
    • June 2006
    • May 2006
    • April 2006
    • March 2006
    • February 2006
    • January 2006
    • December 2005
    • November 2005
    • October 2005
    • September 2005
    • August 2005
    • July 2005
    • June 2005
    • May 2005
    • April 2005
    • March 2005
    • February 2005
    • January 2005
    • December 2004
    • November 2004
    • October 2004
    • September 2004
    • August 2004
    • July 2004
    • June 2004
    • April 2004
    • February 2004
    • January 2004
    • June 2003
    • May 2003
    • February 2003
    • January 2003
    • December 2002
    • November 2002
    • August 2002
    • September 2001
    • August 2001
    • July 2001
    • May 2001
  • Links

    • About
    • Contact Us
    • Get Involved
    • Issues
    • Other Resources
  • Meta

    • Log in
gipoco.com is neither affiliated with the authors of this page nor responsible for its contents. This is a safe-cache copy of the original web site.