Next
Previous
14. Benchmark Results: 512 KB Random Reads/Writes
Can Samsung’s 470-Series Shake Up the SSD Market?
Benchmarking Issues And Trends
A-Data Nobility N002 (Indilinx, 128 GB)
Corsair Force F160 (160 GB, SandForce)
Kingston SSDNow V (128 GB, Toshiba)
Kingston SSDNow V+ (128 GB, Toshiba)
Patriot Inferno (120 GB, SandForce)
Samsung 470-Series (Also Known As PM810 [256 GB])
Comparison Table And Test Setup
Benchmark Results: Access Time And I/O Performance
Benchmark Results: h2benchw Throughput And Iometer Streaming
Benchmark Results: CrystalDiskMark Sequential Reads/Writes
Benchmark Results: 4 KB Random Reads/Writes
Benchmark Results: 512 KB Random Reads/Writes
Benchmark Results: PCMark Vantage Storage
Benchmark Results: Power Consumption
Benchmark Results: Power Efficiency
Conclusion And Recommendations
Even the SSDs that struggle with small block size testing perform well if we increase the block size to 512 KB. WD and Toshiba, which don’t play a major role in the SSD performance segment, deliver decent read throughput.
Again, Samsung’s 470-series shows its strength in sustaining write throughput, only bowing to the RealSSD C300 and the K5 from Solidata, which runs single level cell (SLC) flash memory.
Previous
Next
Summary
- Can Samsung’s 470-Series Shake Up the SSD Market?
- Benchmarking Issues And Trends
- A-Data Nobility N002 (Indilinx, 128 GB)
- Corsair Force F160 (160 GB, SandForce)
- Kingston SSDNow V (128 GB, Toshiba)
- Kingston SSDNow V+ (128 GB, Toshiba)
- Patriot Inferno (120 GB, SandForce)
- Samsung 470-Series (Also Known As PM810 [256 GB])
- Comparison Table And Test Setup
- Benchmark Results: Access Time And I/O Performance
gipoco.com
is neither affiliated with the authors of this page or responsible
for its contents. This is a safe-cache copy of the original web site.
for its contents. This is a safe-cache copy of the original web site.
gipoco.com
is neither affiliated with the authors of this page nor responsible
for its contents. This is a safe-cache copy of the original web site.