• Sign In /
VISIT THE NEW ONEARTH
Our magazine has a new home—and a new daily news companion, Earthwire. Click to read them.
Published by the Natural Resources Defense Council (NRDC) Support Us ➔
spacer
  • Current Issue
  • Digital Edition
  • Explore Archive
  • About OnEarth

Search

Follow OnEarth

Sign Up for Our Newsletter

--> -->

Columns & Blogs

spacer
Susan Freinkel: Material World
Can a new scorecard help us avoid toxic plastic?
spacer
Tracie McMillan: The Future of Food
Six "surprises" about the state of the American farm
spacer
George Black: Global Current
How to help Indians without reliable power? (Think small)
spacer
Gail Henry: Depth of Field
Wildfire season arrives ahead of schedule and full of rage
spacer
Elizabeth Royte: Upstream and Down
Politicians letting you down on climate? Follow your art.
spacer
Jeff Turrentine: The Human Landscape
Will Texas be the first state to fire up a bullet train?
spacer
Jason Bittel: Species Watch
Ocean acidification is a great weight-loss solution for sharks (side effects may vary, and kill)
spacer
Melissa Mahony: This Really Old House
Chickeneering is a thing. And these six hens won the lottery
spacer
Laura Wright Treadway: HomeLab
Replacing screen time with mud pies and stick sculptures
spacer
Scott Dodd: Editor's Blog
We’ve got a lime shortage. Is Cinco de Mayo doomed?
spacer
David Gessner: Wild Life
Snowy owls invade the South
spacer
Kim Tingley: Working Hypothesis
How sharp-eyed scientists discovered—on the fly—a new and better way to deal with offshore oil spills

Top Stories

spacer
Oil companies are abandoning tar sands. Why? No KXL, no profit
By Brian Palmer
spacer
The U.S. government is sponsoring insect assassins. (Don’t worry. It’s a good thing.)
By Ginger Strand
spacer
Exclusive: Bloomberg talks cites and climate change ahead of UN summit
By Andrew Revkin
spacer
BP could be fined up to $18 billion for Gulf spill—enough to fix broken lives and deformed crabs?
By Rocky Kistner

UnEarthed

In the News. From Our Archives.
spacer
Lake Erie Deathwatch
By Barry Yeoman
spacer
Our Silver-Coated Future
By Robin Marantz Henig
spacer
True Believer
By Jeff Turrentine

Facebook

Most Popular

spacer
Politicians letting you down on climate? Follow your art.
By Elizabeth Royte
spacer
You won’t believe the crap (literally) that factory farms feed to cattle
By Brad Jacobson
spacer
Huge factory farms are poisoning Iowa's drinking water—all to feed China
By Ted Genoways
spacer
Climate change could wipe out Minnesota’s iconic moose
By Jessica Benko
spacer
If built, the Keystone XL pipeline would end in one toxic town
By Ted Genoways

Advice on health and home from NRDC's green living guru
Acting and Activism: Q&A with Meryl Streep
By Wendy Gordon
February 25, 2012 | (4) Comments
Share | |

spacer

Actress Meryl Streep’s Oscar-nominated performance in The Iron Lady "nails the former prime minister's look, sound, and spirit," according to a former co-worker of Margaret Thatcher’s. Streep is renowned for her ability to transform herself into a character. But few know about her real-life roles as a transformative environmental health activist, geothermal energy pioneer, and veggie-pushing mother.

This queen of Hollywood, nominated for 17 Academy Awards (winner of two), went green well before it was in vogue and speaks fondly of her grandmother’s recycling habits and her parents’ resourcefulness. When I first met Meryl in 1988, she had recently returned from filming A Cry in the Dark in Australia. She had been there when the ozone hole had been found over the continent. The discovery, along with maternal concerns for the health of her then three children, pushed Meryl toward activism. She soon began helping the Natural Resource Defense Council (which publishes OnEarth) to raise awareness for environmental issues.

In the late eighties, Alar -- a growth regulator used on apples -- became a household name, invoking worries about toxins found on fruits and vegetables. After NRDC published the Alar report, Meryl and I worked together to create Mothers & Others, a campaign to rally citizens in the fight for tougher pesticide standards. Such standards now help protect infants and young children, who are particularly vulnerable to pesticide residues. The campaign had been transformational, using the power of the consumer to change the marketplace. And Meryl, of course, was a scene-stealer in the movement. She connected the dots for people, brought it home, and made it personal.

I caught up with Meryl last year in a quiet tea room in New York City.

What first drew you to environmental health issues?

Humans are very self-interested. I became interested in all these things when I was consciously feeding a baby and had a sense that everything you do is going to have an outcome further down the road. So I was very conscious to try to do the right thing and do well by our kids. Being naturally sort of slovenly, I had to sit up and pay attention, because I really think about my work most of the time. When kids came into the picture, everything I read made me think "Yes, you are right, You are right." Everything we now know about the developing brain and young children reminds us that the first things, even in utero, that you introduce into their little fragile developing systems bear an outcome later on.

And now after 22 years, moms are still on the front lines in these fights for healthier products and lifestyles.

Absolutely. In a way it's like going to mass. They may say the same thing every week, but you have to go back and hear it over and over again. Knowledge must be passed to each successive generation.

Are you still a label reader? I remember you once saying that consumers need to be like chemists or toxicologists when they go shopping.

I was being facetious to make a point. There are so many thousands of chemicals used to make our everyday products. Most of these have not been adequately tested for their effects on health. If I were a new mother now and trying to figure out what nipple to put on a bottle, I would be reading all these things. I’d find out what BPA is, and I'd read about endocrine mimickers. I do lament that I didn't know anything about the problems with plastics when my oldest was born.

I have such a wide range of kids. My oldest is 12 years older than the youngest. When Henry was little I was throwing these bottles in the microwaves, the way we all were. I don't think you ever stop being worried. So I did all those things, and then stopped by the time the last one came along. I think I weaned her from the breast to the cup pretty much, and she didn't really have a lot of bottles. But she had those plastic suckies, the pacifiers, with the phthalates

I try not to buy plastic bottles anymore. When I do, I look at the bottom to see if it's recyclable. But I think a faster way and the way the market really responds to is to name the brand that is good. If you draw people to a brand, the other brands get the picture. Don’t tell people to turn the product over where there's all that small print. The short cut is to say "You know what, this brand is good" and draw traffic to it.

Informing and engaging concerned consumers is why we created Mothers & Others.


Yes, and that's why we called it Mothers & Others. Frankly, it is the mother with her child. That's the most invested relationship. It makes us pause a moment and look deeply into these things. The other side of life rushes head long into the new technology and then they go, "oh whoops," ten years later. Mothers are the brakes on the car, a good thing to have, not just the accelerator. And that's why it has to be non-profit media bringing this information to people, because with for-profits this is never going to be the sexy story. They will always go after Brangelina. This is what we care about.

Speaking of the media, profit motives, and non-profits needing to sound alarms on health and environmental threats, I want to ask you about the campaign that sought to de-legitimize the science behind NRDC's Alar report. It was complicated to be sure, but why do you think the media seemed to fix on the propaganda story of the "Alar Scare" but largely ignored how the report's benefits of better pesticide regulations and more informed consumers?

The press got it totally wrong, thanks to the Elizabeth Whelan and ACSH’s (American Council for Science and Health) propaganda machine, about "the Alar scare." But the truth did get through to consumers. It was an incredible turning point. The actions [of that year] did change how pesticides are regulated, how tolerances are set. And we still have delicious apples, right? They just are grown without Alar. It is only used on flowers now.

It's interesting. Elizabeth Whelan resurfaced when I did a lot of the press for Julie & Julia. You may recall in the film, Julie (played by Amy Adams) approached Julia Child and Julia was so cranky and didn't like her. It reminded me of the time when we approached Julia Child to join our campaign back in 1989. I never met her in person, but I tried to enlist her in our effort. She was extremely dismissive. She actually was a mouthpiece for Elizabeth Whelan's group. I said that ACSH was a front for industry, agrichemical industries, and that everybody’s not necessarily looking out for America's health and welfare. Julia went nuts. She was mad. She said "well buh buh buh, this is not a front for industry, we have many reputable scientists on our board, and blah, blah, blah. You know saying the same old thing that isn't true.

I’d forgotten about that. Is there a takeaway from Julie & Julia that relates to our concerns about food, environment, and health?

The idea of real food. If it makes your mouth water, generally you know it's probably ok. I guess a Big Mac makes your mouth water ... Her [Julia's] message was you can eat butter and all these things we've been taught to fear, but as long as it's a little bit. Moderation and portion size, portion size, portion size -- that's the difference. That's the whole thing. It's all about moderation, and real food, you know food that is recognizable.

What should people be most mindful of today?

The shopping. Before you take your food home, you need to consider where it comes from. It's about being a careful consumer, with thoughtfulness applied to every decision. The idea that your food budget is a really important thing may be as important as your cable budget. Maybe you don't need 20 channels of ESPN. Maybe you spend less over here, so you can spend more on healthier, safer foods. Some foods may be more expensive, but they're cheaper in the long run. It's all about the long run, in my view.

You can also save money by cooking more at home. Do you buy mostly organic? Local?

Yes. I buy organic, though not everything. I buy local mostly. I live in the city. I go to the farmers' market. I do shop at Whole Foods, but I shop at my local Food Emporium, which carries a lot of things they didn't used to, which is sort of wonderful. I remember back in the olden days when

gipoco.com is neither affiliated with the authors of this page nor responsible for its contents. This is a safe-cache copy of the original web site.