spacer
Listen News Programs Schedule
PLEDGE NOW
Cognoscenti Thinking That Matters
more Science
Environment

Colleges Should Divest From Fossil Fuels. That Means You, Harvard

  • by
  • 5
spacer
  • PRINT
  • EMAIL

In this Jan. 19, 2012 file photo, smoke rises in this time exposure image from the stacks of the La Cygne Generating Station coal-fired power plant in La Cygne, Kan. Federal records show that this year the nation’s weather has been hotter and more extreme than ever. (Charlie Riedel/AP, file)

I grew up in Cambridge, just around the corner from Harvard Yard, and the first word in Latin I ever learned was “Veritas.” Truth. The motto, laid out in those three iconic books that adorn the Harvard shield, is plastered on everything from sweatshirts to the statue of John Harvard.

As institutions dedicated not to profit — but to education, colleges and universities have a special responsibility not to fund the destruction of the planet.

Harvard’s commitment to its creed is now being tested by a new campaign pushing the college to divest from the fossil fuel industry. Along with students at over 100 other campuses across the country, Harvard undergrads are pushing the college to immediately freeze all new investments in the fossil fuel industry and then phase out all holdings over the next five years. Earlier this month, a student body resolution supporting divestment passed with 72 percent of the vote.

The campaign is part of a new, nationwide divestment movement spearheaded by 350.org, an international climate campaign that I helped co-found with writer (and Harvard graduate) Bill McKibben. Over the last month, we’ve been building support for the effort with an old-fashioned, 21-city road show called. When the “Do The Math” tour came to Boston on Nov. 15, we sold out the 2,500 seat Orpheum Theater.

Bill first laid out the math that we’re talking about this summer, in a piece for Rolling Stone that went viral, becoming one of the most shared online articles in the magazine’s history. It goes like this: So far we’ve warmed the planet 1 degree Celsius, enough to melt the polar ice-caps and plunge most of the country into an epic drought this summer. Scientists say that in order to avoid climate catastrophe we must keep warming below 2 C, a target that the U.S. and nearly every other country on Earth has agreed to meet. To stay below that mark, we can only emit another 565 gigatons of carbon dioxide into the atmosphere. Now, here comes the scary part: The fossil fuel industry currently has 2795 gigatons of CO2 in their reserves and every day they’re spending hundreds of millions of dollars looking for more carbon to burn.

Do the math: Fossil fuel corporations, and the countries that act like fossil fuel companies (think Saudi Arabia and Venezuela), are planning to emit five times more carbon dioxide than scientists and governments have agreed is safe. As Bill put it, either the fossil fuel industry has a healthy bottom line or we have a healthy planet, you can’t have both.

spacer

Bill McKibben, pictured here in Nov. 2012, has said “Either the fossil fuel industry has a healthy bottom line or we have a healthy planet, you can’t have both.” (350.org)

This is where divestment comes in. As institutions dedicated not to profit — but to education, colleges and universities have a special responsibility not to fund the destruction of the planet. Divestment is not only a tool to strip away the social license of the fossil fuel industry, but a way for universities to live up to their core values.

In 1990, Harvard joined other colleges across the country to divest from the tobacco industry. It was the right decision. Today, smokestacks are just as dangerous as cigarettes. If it was right to divest from the tobacco industry, then it’s only consistent to divest from the fossil fuel industry as well.

Perhaps the most famous use of divestment related to the struggle to end apartheid in South Africa. At Harvard, the debate over whether to divest from that country went on for years. In 1984, the Advisory Committee on Shareholder Responsibility voted in favor of total divestment, writing:

Even if the costs were great, would it be too great for the University — which exists to serve the pursuit of Truth — to pay in order to separate itself from support of a regime which denies the truth to which this university has always been dedicated: that all people are created equal?

Harvard is also dedicated, one assumes, to the truth that all people and future generations, deserve a livable planet. It’s time for President Drew Gilpin Faust and the Harvard Corporation to live up to their motto and divest from fossil fuels.

Related:

  • Environmental champion Bill McKibben on fracking, pipelines, and Mother Earth (On Point)
  • As Other Colleges Discuss Divestment, Harvard Stays Mum (The Harvard Crimson)

Tags: Environment

The views and opinions expressed in this piece are solely those of the writer and do not in any way reflect the views of WBUR management or its employees.

Science
Prev
  • spacer

    ‘Dirty Old Man': What If It’s Not A Cultural Trope, But A Gentleman Losing His Mind?

    By Elizabeth Marcus
  • spacer

    Attracting Latina Students To STEM Careers, One Role Model At A Time

    By Noramay Cadena
  • spacer

    This Time Is Different: Obama’s Climate Change Opportunity

    By David Wirth
  • spacer

    Two Stories, One Reason: Why An Actor And An Athlete Refuse To Support Football

    By Marianne Leone
  • spacer

    Computer Engineer Barbie: Not Just Anatomically Incorrect

    By Sarah Kuhn
  • spacer

    The Unintended Consequences Of Cultural Blindspots In Health Care

    By Jennifer Potter
  • spacer

    This Thanksgiving, I’m Thankful For The Atlantic Cod

    By Janna Malamud Smith
  • spacer

    President Obama’s Climate Deal Doesn’t Go Far Enough

    By Jon D. Lee
  • spacer

    Why It Matters That The World’s Two Biggest Polluters Forged A Climate Accord

    By Robert C. Bordone and Sara E. del Nido
  • spacer

    And The Nobel Prize For Facilitating Scientific Discovery Goes To: The Minivan

    By Suzanne Greenwald
  • spacer

    Preaching To The Choir? Beyond The People’s Climate March

    By Christopher R. Knittel
  • spacer

    Could Legalizing Pot Reduce Accidental Deaths From Harder Drugs?

    By Judy Foreman
  • spacer

    A Quarter Century Of Righting Wrongful Convictions

    By Daniel S. Medwed
  • spacer

    Cracking The Girl Code In Math And Science

    By Erica Orthmann
  • spacer

    To Deny The Deniers, Champion The Cause Of Science

    By Christopher R. Knittel
  • spacer

    Thinking With Your Feet: How Soccer Rewires Your Brain

    By Jeffrey Holt
  • spacer

    Dismissing The Deniers: Climate Change Is Real

    By Rich Barlow
  • spacer

    The Psychology Of Violence In Sports — On The Field And In The Stands

    By Leonard L. Glass
  • spacer

    The Dark Side Of Getting Into College

    By Lauren Stiller Rikleen
  • spacer

    The Danger Of Absolutist Advocates Who Want It All

    By David Ropeik
Next
Please follow our community rules when engaging in comment discussion on this site.
  • karlostj

    Do the Math: The Earth has warmed and cooled before, over multi-million-year spans. Polar bears are still with us. Warmer is better for plant and animal life. And yet, Global Warming Alarmists still shriek incessantly about 1 degree, most of which can be accounted for by inaccurate measuring and fudging by climate models. Maybe physics and thermodynamics and that math stuff doesn’t work in your hypothetical realm.

    • jeremyhayes

      Nice! The lunatics are going to be attacking you soon!

      • bafranta
gipoco.com is neither affiliated with the authors of this page nor responsible for its contents. This is a safe-cache copy of the original web site.