Vol 8 (2015)
Main Articles
Sentence-internal
"same" and its quantificational licensors: A new window into
the processing of inverse scope |
PDF
|
Adrian
Brasoveanu,
Jakub
Dotlačil |
1:1-52 |
Chimerical conditionals |
PDF
|
Itamar Francez |
2:1-35 |
The role of givenness, presupposition, and prosody in Czech word order: An experimental study |
PDF
|
Radek Šimík, Marta Wierzba |
3:1-103 |
Neg-raising and positive polarity: The view from modals |
PDF
|
Vincent Homer |
4:1-88 |
On the semantics and pragmatics of epistemic vocabulary |
PDF
|
Sarah Moss |
5:1-81 |
The Degree Semantics Parameter and cross-linguistic variation |
PDF
|
M. Ryan Bochnak |
6:1-48 |
Dual Content Semantics, privative adjectives, and dynamic compositionality |
PDF
|
Guillermo Del Pinal |
7:1-53 |
The ingredients of comparison: The semantics of the excessive construction in Japanese |
PDF
|
Xiao Li |
8:1-38 |
Incremental quantification and the dynamics of pair-list phenomena |
PDF
|
Dylan Bumford |
9:1-70 |
A "de-Fregean" semantics (and neo-Gricean pragmatics) for modified and unmodified numerals |
|
Christopher Kennedy |
10:1-44 |
Investigating the distribution of some (but not all) implicatures using corpora and web-based methods |
|
Judith Degen |
11:1-55 |
Vol 7 (2014)
Main Articles
A discourse model for überhaupt |
PDF |
Tania Rojas-Esponda |
1:1-45 |
Varieties of update |
PDF |
Sarah E. Murray |
2:1-53 |
Bound 'de re' pronouns and the LFs of attitude reports |
PDF
|
Simon Charlow, Yael Sharvit |
3:1-43 |
Contrast and the structure of discourse |
PDF
|
Maziar Toosarvandani |
4:1-57 |
Dependent indefinites and their post-suppositions |
PDF
|
Robert Henderson |
6:1-58 |
Mixed quotation: The grammar of apparently transparent opacity |
PDF
|
Emar Maier |
7:1-67 |
Disfluencies as intra-utterance dialogue moves |
PDF
|
Jonathan Ginzburg, Raquel Fernández, David Schlangen |
9:1-64 |
Epistemic modals and context: Experimental data |
PDF
|
Joshua Knobe, Seth Yalcin |
10:1-21 |
Global positive polarity items and obligatory exhaustivity |
PDF
|
Benjamin Spector |
11:1-61 |
Squibs, Remarks, and Replies
Cancelling the Maxim of Quantity: Another challenge for a Gricean theory of Scalar Implicatures |
PDF
|
Danny Fox |
5:1-20 |
Typicality made familiar: A commentary on Geurts and van Tiel (2013) |
PDF
|
Chris Cummins |
8:1-15 |
Vol 6 (2013)
Main Articles
Modals with a taste of the deontic |
PDF |
Joshua Knobe, Zoltán Gendler Szabó |
1:1-42 |
Strategic Conversation |
PDF |
Nicholas Asher, Alex Lascarides |
2:1-62 |
Raising and resolving issues with scalar modifiers |
PDF |
Elizabeth Coppock, Thomas Brochhagen |
3:1-57 |
'And' or 'or': General use coordination in ASL |
PDF |
Kathryn Davidson |
4:1-44 |
It's that, and that's it! Exhaustivity and homogeneity presuppositions in clefts (and definites) |
PDF
|
Daniel Büring, Manuel Kriz |
6:1-29 |
Epistemics and attitudes |
PDF
|
Pranav Anand, Valentine Hacquard |
8:1-59 |
Embedded scalars |
PDF
|
Bart Geurts, Bob van Tiel |
9:1-37 |
Experimenting with the king of France: Topics, verifiability and definite descriptions |
PDF
|
Márta Abrusán, Kriszta Szendrői |
10:1-43 |
Squibs, Remarks, and Replies
A note on presupposition accommodation |
PDF |
Roni Katzir, Raj Singh |
5:1-16 |
N-words and sentential negation: Evidence from polarity particles and VP ellipsis |
PDF
|
Adrian Brasoveanu, Donka Farkas, Floris Roelofsen |
7:1-33 |
Vol 5 (2012)
Main Articles
Presuppositions, provisos, and probability |
PDF |
Daniel Lassiter |
2:1-37 |
The meaning of plural definites: A decision-theoretic approach |
PDF |
Sophia A. Malamud |
3:1-58 |
Counterfactual attitudes and multi-centered worlds |
PDF |
Dilip Ninan |
5:1-57 |
Information Structure: Towards an integrated formal theory of pragmatics |
PDF |
Craige Roberts |
6:1-69 |
Information Structure: Afterword |
PDF |
Craige Roberts |
7:1-19 |
Contrastive topics decomposed |
PDF |
Michael Wagner |
8:1-54 |
Squibs, Remarks, and Replies
Two types of class B numeral modifiers: A reply to Nouwen 2010 |
PDF |
Bernhard Schwarz, Brian Buccola, Michael Hamilton |
1:1-25 |
Embedding epistemic modals in English: A corpus-based study |
PDF |
Valentine Hacquard, Alexis Wellwood |
4:1-29 |
Vol 4 (2011)
Main Articles
Quantity implicatures, exhaustive interpretation, and rational conversation |
PDF |
Michael Franke |
1:1-82 |
Explaining presupposition projection with dynamic semantics |
PDF |
Daniel Rothschild |
3:1-43 |
Wh-islands in degree questions: A semantic approach |
PDF |
Márta Abrusán |
5:1-44 |
Another argument for embedded scalar implicatures based on oddness in downward entailing environments |
PDF |
Giorgio Magri |
6:1-51 |
Temporal anaphora across and inside sentences: The function of participles |
PDF |
Corien Bary, Dag Trygve Truslew Haug |
8:1-56 |
Squibs, Remarks, and Replies
Exhaustivity in questions with non-factives |
PDF |
Daniel Rothschild, Nathan Klinedinst |
2:1-23 |
Operators or restrictors? A reply to Gillies |
PDF |
Justin Khoo |
4:1-25 |
Modification in non-combining idioms |
PDF |
Scott McClure |
7:1-7 |
Vol 3 (2010)
Main Articles
Quantifiers in Than-Clauses |
PDF |
Sigrid Beck |
1:1-72 |
Two kinds of modified numerals |
PDF |
Rick Nouwen |
3:1-41 |
Iffiness |
PDF |
Anthony S Gillies |
4:1-42 |
The semantics and pragmatics of plurals |
PDF |
Henriëtte de Swart, Donka Farkas |
6:1-54 |
Varieties of conventional implicature |
PDF |
Eric Scott McCready |
8:1-57 |
Cross-linguistic variation in modality systems: The role of mood |
PDF |
Lisa Matthewson |
9:1-74 |
Free choice permission as resource-sensitive reasoning |
PDF |
Chris Barker |
10:1-38 |
Squibs, Remarks, and Replies
Embedded Implicatures and Experimental Constraints: A Reply to Geurts & Pouscoulous and Chemla |
PDF |
Uli Sauerland |
2:1-13 |
Embedded Implicatures? Remarks on the debate between globalist and localist theories |
PDF |
Michela Ippolito |
5:1-15 |
Embedded implicatures observed: a comment on Geurts and Pouscoulous (2009) |
PDF |
Charles Clifton, Chad Dube |
7:1-13 |
Conjunctive interpretations of disjunctions |
PDF |
Robert van Rooij |
11:1-28 |
Vol 2 (2009)
Main Articles
Universal Implicatures and Free Choice Effects: Experimental Data |
PDF |
Emmanuel Chemla |
2:1-33 |
Local Contexts |
PDF |
Philippe Schlenker |
3:1-78 |
Embedded implicatures?!? |
PDF |
Bart Geurts, Nausicaa Pouscoulous |
4:1-34 |
Squibs, Remarks, and Replies
Bishop Sentences and Donkey Cataphora: A Response to Barker and Shan |
PDF |
Paul David Elbourne |
1:1-7 |
Free choice for all: a response to Emmanuel Chemla |
PDF |
Bart Geurts, Nausicaa Pouscoulous |
5:1-10 |
Vol 1 (2008)
Main Articles
Donkey anaphora is in-scope binding |
PDF |
Chris Barker, Chung-chieh Shan |
1:1-46 |
Forthcoming articles
Moral asymmetries and the semantics of "many" |
Paul Egré and Florian Cova |
Actuality and fake tense in conditionals |
John Mackay |
The semantic and pragmatic underpinnings of grammaticalization paths: The progressive to imperfective shift |
Ashwini Sharad Deo |
Consistency preservation in Quantity implicature: the case of at least |
Bernhard Schwarz |
Focus fronting, unexpectedness, and the evaluative dimension |
Valentina Bianchi, Giuliano Bocci, Silvio Cruschina |
Comparing theories of quantifiers in than clauses: Lessons from downward-entailing differentials |
Nicholas Fleisher |
A novel problem for the likelihood-based semantics of even |
Yael Greenberg |
How similar is similar enough? |
Michela Ippolito |
About the Journal
Semantics and Pragmatics (S&P) is published by the Linguistic Society of America (LSA). It is a fully open-access peer-reviewed journal publishing high quality, original, self-contained research articles on the semantics and pragmatics of natural languages. In 2013, in its sixth year of publication, Semantics & Pragmatics became one of only two full journals of the LSA, alongside the society’s flagship journal, Language. There are no publication fees of any kind for publication in S&P.
While the core target audience of Semantics & Pragmatics is academic linguists, we also publish material by, or of relevance to, philosophers, psychologists, and computer scientists. Papers must include new results of interest to those working in semantics and pragmatics, and must demonstrate clear significance for theoretical development of those areas. Provided the work meets those criteria, we welcome both submissions of papers on core topics in semantics and pragmatics, and submissions of interdisciplinary papers involving work on syntax, phonology, psycho-linguistics, text and corpus studies, discourse and conversation analysis, computational semantics, the lexicon, historical linguistics, cross-linguistic typology, logic, and philosophy of language.
We strongly encourage all readers and prospective authors to register, which will let us send you email notifications of new articles. Other ways of staying in touch with the journal are the RSS newsfeed that you can subscribe to with your favorite newsreader, S&P's Facebook page, S&P on Twitter, and our editors' blog.
Our pilot issue (Vol. 0, 2007) contained an inaugural editorial explaining the concepts behind the journal.
We do not require any particular format for initial submissions (except requiring that the submission be a pdf file).
Once your paper is accepted, it will be typeset in LaTeX in S&P's house style. While we do not require final submission in LaTeX format, we do strongly encourage authors to submit in LaTeX and furthermore to use our LaTeX package. We do provide typesetting services for authors of accepted articles that are not in LaTeX format. However, as explained here, Word submissions will take much longer to reach the publication stage.
We would be grateful for any comments and feedback on the journal and this website. You can send us email or visit our editors' blog and leave a comment there.