About Aid Watch
The Aid Watch blog is a project of New York University's Development Research Institute (DRI). This blog is principally written by William Easterly, author of "The Elusive Quest for Growth: Economists' Adventures and Misadventures in the Tropics" and "The White Man's Burden: Why the West's Efforts to Aid the Rest Have Done So Much Ill and So Little Good," and Professor of Economics at NYU. It is co-written by Laura Freschi and by occasional guest bloggers. Our work is based on the idea that more aid will reach the poor the more people are watching aid.
"Conscience is the inner voice that warns us somebody may be looking." - H.L. Mencken
Recent Comments
- Rukmini on Aid Watch blog ends; New work on development begins : This has been a valuable resource for me and I’m sorry to see it...
- Jesse on From Hell to Prosperity: I would like to see this graph with a comparative one which shows the number of people in each religion...
- Ellie on Aid Watch blog ends; New work on development begins : Sad to see you go, but I certainly respect the decision. Hope it is...
- Vivek Nemana on From Hell to Prosperity: Jeff, Well, the billionaire effect might explain a disproportionately high mean income, but...
- M on Aid Watch blog ends; New work on development begins : I agree that Bill and Laura should think about how they can get their message...
- Mr. Econotarian on Are Lax US Gun Laws Spilling Violence into Mexico? : The paper says: “DHS data gives the number of illegal...
Archives
Who should be the next IMF chief?
Even if the serious charges against IMF head Dominique Strauss-Kahn are proven false, the IMF will likely be in need of a new leader.
With DSK handcuffed in the back, who will take the IMF driver's seat?
According to unwritten agreement, the IMF has always been headed by a European, just as the president of the World Bank has always been American.
Some (mainly Europeans, funnily enough) argue that the IMF needs a European leader now more than ever, because the biggest issues the IMF currently faces are in the eurozone rather than in the developing world. Possibilities named include French Finance Minister Christine Lagarde, Italian Central Bank head Mario Draghi.
Others, like Felix Salmon, argue it’s time for a change. After all, when he was chosen in 2007 DSK himself said that his appointment would be the last time a European automatically got the nod. “Voice and representation of most countries in a changing world have to be better taken into account by the board, but also by the staff,” he said, “as well as by management.”
Owen Barder calls for the selection to be open, transparent, and merit-based (in contrast to the back-room deals that usually cinch the nomination.) This would open the field to contenders like Turkish former UNDP head Kemal Dervis and South African politician Trevor Manuel.
Meanwhile, the Freakonomics blog attempts to rescue the reputation of economists the world over by reminding us that morality and occupational choice are not highly correlated.
Postscript from Bill 8:30am Tuesday: Did the IMF get it wrong in 2008? Disturbing story in NYT this morning about the previous DSK sex scandal of an affair with a subordinate:
The Board concluded that … Mr. Strauss-Kahn …had not abused his power.
In a letter to the board {at the time}, {the woman in the affair} disagreed, saying Mr. Strauss-Kahn had used his power as managing director to become intimate with her.
“I was damned if I did and damned if I didn’t,” she wrote in a letter to the investigators. In the letter, she went on to say that Mr. Strauss-Kahn was “a man with a problem that may make him ill-equipped to lead an institution where women work under his command.”
10 Comments
the next International Monetary Fund (IMF) chief should be anybody from “China, India or south east Asia”, not his predecessor Gordon Brown.
orlando real estate for sale lake mary homes
Owen got it spot on in his post.
“According to unwritten agreement, the IMF has always been headed by a European, just as the president of the World Bank has always been American.”
Just a correction Laura, James Wolfensohn, the ninth president of the World Bank is Australian.
From the list given here it should be Trevor Manuel. There are back door deals but having someone from the area of the world the Bank was originally supposed to help will, hopefully, focus on getting things done.
Jim Wolfensohn was born in Australia but he became a US citizen a long time ago — some say, precisely to make himself eligible for WB Presidency.
Where I come from the IMF is utterly reviled. These events merely reinforce that feeling.
Pundits have made much of the fact that the man who led the institution famous for insisting on austerity measures was accused of committing a crime in a $3,000 a night hotel.
Coming back to the question posed by the post, the larger issue is that the IMF and the World Bank as presently constituted are more suited for the World of 1945 than for today’s World. I believe these institutions are on the path to irrelevance irrespective of who heads them.
Here’s an idea: instead of appointing a new leader, just get rid of the IMF entirely!
Why not to nominate a new eurozone member: Estonia, for xample, who’s record in keeping the budget balanced has been remarkable.
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Siim_Kallas, for example.
I believe that all these criminal cases based on sexual attraction may affect only European power. This infighting, intrigue, this all instruementy European politicians. Which resulted in the European economy to collapse. The European Union can not long survive due to the European mentality. EU remind me of a group of women who meet demogogiyu.
European mind has not changed since hitler. Essentially they are pursuing his agenda in a subtle and soft manner. European economies are not worth the salt except that they are always given soft loans by there cronies like IMF and World Bank. Its time to trash this euro centric and hegemonistic attitude. Let all others leave this damn IMF and float another body.
One Trackback
[…] Visit link: Who should be the next IMF chief? […]