My MSc Dissertation: crowdsourcing games for museums

In 2011 I completed my dissertation project for City University’s Human-Centred Systems MSc. It started out as ‘Game mechanics for social good: a case study on interaction models for crowdsourcing museum collections enhancement’ and ended up as ‘Playing with difficult objects: game designs for crowdsourcing museum metadata‘.

To quote from my dissertation, ultimately I investigated the question:

  • ‘can metadata games be designed to encourage people to play with ‘difficult’ museum objects while producing content that will improve museum websites?’

The project also explored a supplementary question that emerged after reviewing related cultural heritage metadata projects:

  • ‘can games be designed to take crowdsourcing beyond tagging? That is, games to encourage the creation of metadata that requires more effort, time or skill than tags (but without creating additional institutional resource requirements for advance data cleaning, object selection or manual game content validation)?’

The original (quickly outdated) project objectives were:

  • Design game-like interaction models applicable to cultural heritage content and audiences through research, analysis and creativity workshops
  • Build an application and interfaces to implement the interaction designs and to create and store user-created content linked to collections content
  • Evaluate the effectiveness of game-like interaction models for eliciting useful content

The beta games I made are hosted at Museum Metadata Games (recently updated with a responsive theme and to include some of the million images from the British Library’s Flickr Commons release).

A quick note after some responses to my project made me realise that my slightly sarcastic comment that the “game was ‘marketed’ sporadically on personal social media channels” may have been too subtle for the hurried or non-native English reader… The main focus of my evaluation phase was in-person play testing, but as the games were picked up on social media, I was able to evaluate wider responses and participation rates. However, as these online participation rates were not the result of a planned marketing or outreach campaign they largely reflect the constitution of my own social networks and should not be taken as indicative of potential results had I taken a more targeted approach to promoting the project. In other words, cultural heritage technologists like to check out other people’s projects but are not necessarily casual game players, so participation rates based on my personal social networks are not statistically reliable.

Open Access version available

MiaRidge_MSc_Dissertation ‘Playing with difficult objects: game designs for crowdsourcing museum metadata’.

Abstract: This project explores the potential for casual browser-based games to help improve the quality of museum catalogue records. The project goal was to design and build casual yet compelling games that would have a positive impact on a practical level, helping improve the mass of ‘difficult’ – technical, near-duplicate, poorly catalogued or scantily digitised – records that make up the majority of many history museum collections. The project was successful in designing games that created improved metadata for ‘difficult’ objects from two science and history museum collections: Dora, a tagging game, and Donald, an experimental ‘trivia’ game that explored emergent game-play around longer forms of content that required some form of research or personal reference.

Keywords: museums, collections, games, crowdsourcing, websites.

The CC-BY license means you have to credit anything you use, but more importantly, I’d love to hear from anyone who finds it useful or who has questions or comments on it.

spacer
Playing with difficult objects: game designs for crowdsourcing museum metadata by Mia Ridge is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 Unported License.
Based on a work at www.miaridge.com/my-msc-dissertation-crowdsourcing-games-for-museums/.

Selected publications and papers

  • Chapter, ‘Crowdsourcing games: playing with museums’ in Museums At Play: Games, Interaction and Learning, MuseumsEtc, 2011
  • May 2011, Edinburgh, Everyone wins: crowdsourcing games and museums (invited talk at MuseumNext)
  • May 2011, Vienna, Museum Games and UGC: Improving Collections Through Play (invited talk at ‘User-generated content for galleries, museums, libraries and archives’)
  • May 2011, Stockholm, Museum Crowdsourcing Games: Improving Collections Through Play (and some thoughts on re-inventing museums) (invited talk)
  • April 2011, Philadelphia, Playing with Difficult Objects – Game Designs to Improve Museum Collections, slides Playing with Difficult Objects – Game Designs to Improve Museum Collections, Museums on the Web conference 2011. My MW2011 paper is probably the most accessible as it is online as well as in the printed publication.
  • My research on crowdsourcing continued throughout my PhD so you can find further publications here.

I occasionally blogged about my MSc dissertation project as I went:

  • Friday, 16 September 2011, ‘Entrepreneurship and Social Media’ and ‘Collaborating to Compete’, a super-short version of my findings about casual game designs for crowdsourcing and audience engagement
  • Monday, 21 March 2011, Rockets, Lockets and Sprockets – towards audience models about collections?
  • Tuesday, 4 January 2011, Interview about museum metadata games and a pretty picture
  • Tuesday, 21 December 2010, Design constraints and research questions: museum metadata games
  • Friday, 18 June 2010, ‘Game mechanics for social good: a case study on interaction models for crowdsourcing museum collections enhancement’

Responses to my MSc Dissertation

I was really excited to discover that another Masters student has extended my research in their own MSc dissertation. I can only assume this is a direct result of making my dissertation publicly available, which is an unexpected but lovely outcome:

Crowdsourcing cultural heritage metadata through social media gaming by Dimitris Paraschakis ‘continues the research of Ridge, who studied the design of “crowdsourcing games” in the cultural heritage sector. As an extension of this research, we explore how and why to deliver this type of games on social networks on the example of Facebook’.

The literature review for the 10 Most Wanted project cites my dissertation. It’s also great to see them take on the challenge of research-based tasks.

Seb Chan interviewed me about my crowdsourcing games for his Fresh+New blog.

I was interviewed for the Microtask crowdsourcing blog: ‘Games at the museum: Mia Ridge interview’.

The UK’s Heritage Lottery Fund (HLF) nominated my project as a case study of ‘outstanding digital practice in the heritage sector in the UK and internationally’.

Games in museums

I’m not currently working on this topic, but you can find some excellent researchers and work on the Lift your (museum) game wiki.

8 thoughts on “My MSc Dissertation: crowdsourcing games for museums”

  1. Pingback: Challenge 7: Museums & Games | #hist3812a Fall 2014 Video Games & Simulations for Historians
  2. Pingback: Notes from ‘The Shape of Things: New and emerging technology-enabled models of participation through VGC’ | Open Objects
  3. Pingback: Slow and still dirty Digital Humanities Australasia notes: day 3 - Open Objects
  4. Pingback: 2011: an overview - mia ridgemia ridge
  5. Pingback: Sharing is caring keynote 'Enriching cultural heritage collections through a Participatory Commons' - Open Objects
  6. Pingback: Setting off small fireworks: leaving space for curiosity - Open Objects
  7. Pingback: Frequently Asked Questions about crowdsourcing in cultural heritage - Open Objects
  8. Pingback: Geek for a week: residency at the Powerhouse Museum - Open Objects

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

You may use these HTML tags and attributes: <a class="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>