Snowmobiles in Yellowstone National Park:
An American right, or wrong?

Created by Jen Millner, Geoscience Education Web Development Team, Montana State University

This module includes information and resources about:
Impacts on Air Quality :: Impacts on Snowpack Chemistry and Water Quality :: Impacts on Wildlife :: Noise Level Impacts :: Economic Impacts :: Public Opinion :: Proposed Solutions and Alternatives :: Particulate Emissions

You will also findTeaching Activities to help teachers and students utilize and integrate the information into the classroom.

---

What is the controversy all about?

Snowmobiling in the park is controversial on several fronts. Conservationists are concerned about how snowmobiles, and snowmobile emissions in particular, may impact wildlife, air and water quality, noise levels, and the pristine aesthetic of the Yellowstone wilderness. Another concern is for the health effects upon both snowmobile riders and park rangers who are exposed to exhaust and high noise levels for significant amounts of time. Supporters of snowmobiling point to other considerations such as the economic benefits to local communities and the importance of preserving access to public lands. They also contend that newer technologies make cleaner, quieter snowmobiles that mitigate the effects of snowmobile use on air, water and noise pollution.

Background

Snowmobiles were first allowed into the Park in 1963. At the time, the National Park Service (NPS) encouraged sensible snowmobile use in the Park as a way to increase winter visitation. But as snowmobile visitor numbers have grown to more than 75,000 each winter - up to 720 per day - so has concern for the effects that snowmobile emissions, noise, and crowds have on the health of the Greater Yellowstone Ecosystem and those who enjoy it.

Winter use first became a legal issue in 1997 when the animal rights organization Fund For Animals filed a lawsuit to ban all snow grooming of paved roads in the Park, effectively banning snowmobiles because they are only allowed to travel on groomed roads. Upon settlement of that suit, the Park and the NPS began to develop a new usability plan and environment impact statement (EIS) which led to a Record of Decision in 2000 to ban all snowmobiles within the park. This ban became effective in April 2001. A subsequent lawsuit filed by snowmobile manufacturers and supporters prompted a second, supplemental EIS (SEIS) and ultimately overturned that ban in 2003. Legislation continues to be hotly debated while public opinion remains strongly polarized. With both sides still actively pursuing their interests the issue remains unresolved.

Learn more:
Final Rule (more info) - provides background information about the legal events leading up the 2004 decision, a summary of responses to public comments, and economic analyses of proposed alternative management plans.
Winter Use Background Information

Environmental Issues

Impacts on Air Quality

One of the biggest concerns about snowmobiling in Yellowstone is whether or not snowmobile emissions cause air pollution. Those opposed to snowmobiles attest that emissions can lead to health problems for park employees who are subjected to prolonged exposure, while snowmobile supporters contend that the toxicity levels of emissions and exposure rates are not significant enough to cause harm.

Most snowmobiles currently in use have two-stroke motors that pass 20-33% of the fuel straight through the engine and out the tailpipe unburned. Standard two-stroke engines also require that lubricating oil be mixed with fuel, so lubricating oil makes up part of the exhaust. This creates most of the visible haze that snowmobiles produce in the form of particulate matter, which itself is composed primarily of volatile organic compounds and hydrocarbons.

Under Yellowstone's Temporary Winter Use Rules, snowmobiles must meet the NPS's Best Available Technology (BAT) standards for noise and exhaust emissions, including carbon monoxide, unburned hydrocarbons and volatile organic compounds, oxides of nitrogen, and particulate matter. These compounds are common mobile source emissions.


What do you think? Compare the information you've just read with the graphs below.

Click on the image to see a chart of comparative HC, CO, and NOx emissions for different types of engines and vehicles.
Click on the image to see charts of carbon monoxide and hydrocarbon emissions by vehicle type.
Click on the image to see a comparison of emission ratios of selected compounds from two-stroke and four-stroke snowmobile exhaust.

Which type of engine emits the most toxins?

Newer four-stroke engine technology reduces levels of some of these emissions, as well as reducing noise output of the snowmobile. Unfortunately, reducing emission levels does not necessarily reduce the concentrations of those emissions in the air in Yellowstone. The reason is weather. Concentrations may vary depending on wind, temperature, sunlight and inversion.

What do you think?

• How would an inversion effect the dispersion of snowmobile emissions?
• How would this distribution influence health?

---

Impacts on Snowpack Chemistry and Water Quality

One of the least-studied aspects of the environmental impact of snowmobile emissions is their potential effect on snowpack and localized water quality through snowmelt runoff. Quantitative research is sparse and many questions remain unanswered.

In one study, samples taken from the on-road snowpack near West Yellowstone, the most heavily traveled snowmobile route into the park, contained several varieties of PAHs and VOCs known to be major ingredients in two-stroke engine lubricants. Samples taken in Gallatin Canyon where there is car traffic but no snowmobiles did not contain these compounds.

Click on the table to see concentrations of n-alkanes and n-alkyl acids (hydrocarbons) on snowmobile routes.

Click on the graph to see ammonium and sulfate concentrations on snowmobile routes.

What do you think?

• According to the first graph, how is the distribution of n-alkanes and n-alkyl acids (an expected oxidation product of n-alkanes) in the snowpack related to proximity to roads used by snowmobiles?
• According to the second graph, how is the concentration of ammonium and sulfates related to proximity to roads used by snowmobiles?
• Based on this research, do you think this distribution can be definitively attributed to snowmobile emissions?

Read about the Impact of Two-Stroke Engines on Aquatic Resources (Acrobat (PDF) 36kB Apr3 06) to learn about the potential impacts of snowmobile emissions on aquatic organisms. (The full report is available below.)

• There are 185 miles of paved roads groomed for snowmobile use in park, most of which are adjacent to rivers, streams and ponds (see snowmobile route map at right). Considering what you have learned about the distribution of pollutants in the snowpack and the effects of toxins on aquatic organisms, do you think there is potential for surface water contamination from snowmelt runoff? Consider factors such as distance of contaminated snowpack from waterbody, contaminant level versus dilution factor (how large is the water body, is it contained or free-flowing?) and so on.

---

Impacts on Wildlife

Many studies have looked at how wintertime stress affects animal health and survival, but measuring the added stress of vehicle proximity and noise emissions is problematic. Aside from observed interactions between snowmobiles and animals, it is difficult to determine what kinds of long-term impacts snowmobiles may have on animal health from sources such as toxins in snow, water, or soil and the bioaccumulation effects of eating plants that may have taken up these toxins. Furthermore, even highly specialized biochemical studies that look for stress levels in animals may not be able to distinguish the sources of that stress.

Review some of the research:

• Effects of Snowmobiling on Wildlife gives an overview of various studies examining the effects of snowmobiles on deer, elk, bison and other wildlife.
• The first page of this report on Wildlife Responses to Motorized Winter Recreation in Yellowstone presents a statistical summary of snowmobile/wildlife interactions and responses.
• Snowmobiles, Wolves and Elk: The Straight Poop discusses the results of studies that examined stress hormone levels in wolf and elk droppings.

What do you think?

• What is the most common reaction animals have to snowmobiles? Do different animals have different reactions?
• Can stress hormone levels measured in fecal matter be definitively attributed to snowmobile activity? What else may cause elevated stress levels during winter?
• Do these studies indicate that snowmobiles are a danger to wildlife?

---

Human Landscape Issues

Noise Level Impacts

While hearing impairment and high blood pressure are notable health concerns related to sustained high-level noise pollution, when it comes to snowmobiling in the Park the issue is also about how noise emissions affect the visitor experience.

See what those in the snowmobiling industry have to say:

• What is Noise?

See what opponents of snowmobiles have to say:

• Leaked Documents Reveal Lies About Snowmobiles in Parks shows evidence for much higher noise levels than technical reports show.(Original document is not available, accessed through archive.org)
  

What do you think?

• Do noise emissions from snowmobiles have a negative effect on animals?
• Do snowmobile sound levels cause health problems or are they more just a nuisance?

---

Economic Impacts

Snowmobiling is a $27 billion industry in the United States, and the average snowmobiler spends $4,000 annually on recreation. Many small towns in the Park's border states of Idaho, Montana and Wyoming depend upon revenues earned during the winter season. For example, more than half of the 65,000 snowmobiles that entered Yellowstone in 2001 accessed the Park through the town of West Yellowstone, Montana accounting for 75% of Montana's total revenue from the snowmobile industry that year. Read about how winter use regulations and a Lack of Snowmobiles Affect Montana Town.

According to a 1998 report on the Economic Importance of the Winter Season to Park County, Wyoming, 30% of local businesses said that nearly 80% of their total winter revenues came from winter visitors to Yellowstone National Park. This table from the report (Acrobat (PDF) 9kB Apr13 06) shows the economic impact to Park Country of YNP visitors. The Wyoming Department of State Parks and Cultural Resources reports that a ban on snowmobiles could cost Wyoming as many as 938 jobs, no small layoff considering the total state population is just under 494,000. Read the article Yellowstone Snowmobile Ban Leaves Working Families in the Cold for more details.

However, there are hundreds of miles of National Forest open to snowmobiles directly outside Yellowstone, so a ban on snowmobiles in the Park would not mean and end to the snowmobile-based economy altogether.

Furthermore, some would argue that the relative economic health of border towns should not be considered a priority when determining how best to preserve the ecosystem health of a national park. As Kevin Collins of the National Parks Conservation Association says, "It is also essential to note t