Do you know your Congress persons' position on Article V of the Constitution? by Daniel Summars - Saturday, 5 February 2011, 01:49 PM | |
NOTE: Do you know your Congress persons' position on Article V of the Constitution? I wrote my Senators (Senator Kay Bailey Hutchison (R- TX) and Senator John Cornyn (R- TX) ) and Representative (Representative Michael Burgess (R - 26)) on 01-July-2007. I'm still awaiting a reply. Please feel free to use the template letter below.
Dear Senator / Representative [insert name here],
Thank you, Reply |
eRe: Do you know your Congress persons' position on Article V of the Constitution? by Weary Willie - Sunday, 1 July 2007, 03:21 PM | |
Thank you, Daniel, for providing the form letter above. I have sent it via email to Senators Bayh and Lugar on 7-1-2007. I have yet to receive a reply. Perhaps because it does not include a pay raise. Show parent | Reply |
Re: Do you know your Congress persons' position on Article V of the Constitution? by Administrator NumberTwo - Sunday, 1 July 2007, 03:29 PM | |
Michael wrote: Perhaps because it does not include a pay raise. Show parent | Reply |
Re: Do you know your Congress persons' position on Article V of the Constitution? by Weary Willie - Wednesday, 1 August 2007, 06:08 PM | |
Yes! That is what's so frustrating about this amendment thing. If government wants to amend the constitution, government amends the constitution! Just like that. Someone pointed out that the 16th amendment was ratified by a republican congress, yet it was (so called) ratified by the states during Woodrow Wilson's presidency, six years later. And many state documents pertaining to the state's ratification are unsubstanciated. The wording of the law was changed in the state's version and considered a radification of the 16th amendment. The wording of the amendment cannot be changed. It must be ratified by the states as presented to the states. Serious examination of the state's ratification of the 16th amendment must be undertaken before an article V convention takes place. Show parent | Reply |
Re: Do you know your Congress persons' position on Article V of the Constitution? by Daniel Summars - Thursday, 2 August 2007, 08:12 AM | |
Yes, it is very frustrating. It is only one of many ways revealing how arrogant and irresponsible our politicians have become. Congress thinks only they are allowed to make admendments, and are ignoring 567 requests by ALL 50 state legislatures to make amendments. That is a violation of the Constitution and the Supreme Court that also chose to ignore the states' constitutional right clearly stated in Article V of the Constitution. That's why I believe we need to build a list (i.e. an Article V Grade Card) of politicians that either support or oppose the citizens' constitutional right to an Article V Convention. Then, come election 2008, we'll know exactly who to stop re-electing. Congress will continue to ignore the Constitution as long as we repeatedly reward them for it; letting them enjoy a cu$hy 90% to 95% re-election rate since 1996. One thing is for certain. Federal and State politicians will NEVER take the citizens of the nation seriously as long as the citizens (200 million eligible voters) repeatedly reward politicians by repeatedly re-electing them and blindly pulling the party lever; empowering the two-party duopoly's stranglehold. Show parent | Reply |
Re: Do you know your Congress persons' position on Article V of the Constitution? by Weary Willie - Sunday, 1 July 2007, 05:59 PM | |
www.cityofknox.net/ This is an interesting city in the county of Starke, in northern Indiana. It's a small city, 3000+ people. The county seat of Starke. Starke County has a population of around 27,100. It's not a bad place to live... I take that back. Austrialia sounds good to me now. This mayor and this city/county government wouldn't have the slightest idea what Article V of the U.S. Constitution is. They are more concerned with the height of the grass in the neighbor's yard. They are really involved with manipulation the property tax while accumulating as much property as they can via an E.D.I.T. income tax. They use this tax to buy property but they never let go of it. They just keep taking our payroll taxes to fund the purchase of property and the property sits, unproductive. It's considered an asset by the local government and no taxes are paid on this property. Hmmm. My home is next to an extinct glove manufacturing plant. The "Pariso Glove Factory" produced knitted gloves for the automobile manufacturing plants in this area. A union convinced the workforce to insist on higher wages and the "Pariso Glove Factory" was out a' bidnes in just 2 years. A shame. The government sold the assetts to pay back taxes and the government still holds the property some 15 years later. If any Article V convention were to be held, it must be held by people who are NOT lawyers, who are NOT politicians. The First Article V Convention should be held by delegates chosen by a random selection from a pool of valid SSN's. We must first validate the ssn's, or find another way of validating the ratification process. Show parent | Reply |
Re: Do you know your Congress persons' position on Article V of the Constitution? by Daniel Summars - Monday, 2 July 2007, 09:18 AM | |
Property taxes are too high, and getting higher in many places. Show parent | Reply |
Re: Do you know your Congress persons' position on Article V of the Constitution? by Weary Willie - Wednesday, 4 July 2007, 09:06 AM | |
smokytown.typepad.com/smokytown/2000/05/index.html A little piece of the history of Starke County, Indiana. Show parent | Reply |
Re: Do you know your Congress persons' position on Article V of the Constitution? by Weary Willie - Monday, 2 July 2007, 04:04 PM | |
Below is a reply to the form letter I sent to Senator Evan Bayh asking for his position on an Article V convention.
Dear Mr. Densmore :
Thank you for contacting me regarding next year's proposed federal Budget. I appreciate hearing your thoughts and understand your concerns on this issue.
As you may know, on March 23, 2007 the Senate passed, with my support, a budget resolution which funds our nation's priorities, provides tax relief to middle class families and restores fiscal responsibility to our budget process. Increasing debt and deficits are very troubling to me, and they will have a lasting impact on America 's future unless the President and Congress begin to seriously address our nation's fiscal challenges.
The Senate
During consideration of the budget, I joined five other Democrats in offering an amendment to make permanent a number of middle-class tax cuts. The amendment, which passed the Senate by 97-1, made permanent the 10% tax bracket, child tax credit, marriage penalty relief, adoption tax credit, dependent care credit, employer provided child care credit, and EITC combat pay. I will continue to work hard in Washington to provide the tax relief American families need.
It is also troubling to me that the federal government is now borrowing billions each year from foreign creditors, such as the Chinese and Japanese Central banks. The growing indebtedness of our country to foreign competitors raises troubling questions of American independence and the ability of foreign countries to influence our economic and trade policies in ways that might not be in our national interest. In order to avoid this threat to our national interest, I will continue to work with my colleagues on both sides of the aisle to enact sound fiscal policies that do not pass today's burden on to our children and grandchildren.
I will fight to make sure we keep our promises with essential federal programs like Social Security and Medicare, which provide critical support for our nation's elderly. I also support the need to make critical investments in our children, which is why I support additional funding for education and job training. The tax code should also be fair, which is why I have supported the extensions of the middle-class tax cuts such as the marriage penalty relief and child tax credit provisions.
Now is a time for tough choices. With the baby boom retirement looming and the continued costs of the War on Terror, we cannot afford to waste taxpayer money on ineffective federal programs or corporate subsidies. For that reason, I will work in a bipartisan manner with my colleagues to reduce unnecessary spending and close unfair tax loopholes.
Again, thank you for contacting me. I hope that the information I have provided is helpful. My website, bayh.senate.gov , can provide additional details about legislation and state projects, and you can also sign up to receive my monthly e-newsletter, The Bayh Bulletin , by clicking on the link at the top of my homepage. I value your input and hope you will continue to keep me informed of the issues important to you.
Show parent | Reply |
Re: Do you know your Congress persons' position on Article V of the Constitution? by Weary Willie - Monday, 2 July 2007, 04:29 PM | |
I am waiting for replies from Rep. Joe Donnally, and Senator Richard Lugar. Show parent | Reply |
Re: Do you know your Congress persons' position on Article V of the Constitution? by Administrator NumberTwo - Monday, 2 July 2007, 05:06 PM | |
Senator Evan Bayh did not even answer your question. Show parent | Reply |