« Dog bites man | Main | Not dead yet... »
Yeah, it's been a while. Ran out of things to say. And lazy. Maybe I'll start back into this slowly..
So according to the Wall Street Journal:
Of 1,003 U.S. adults surveyed in a telephone poll, 29% think Mr. Bush is doing an "excellent or pretty good" job as president, down from 35% in April and significantly lower than 43% in January. It compares with 71% of Americans who said Mr. Bush is doing an "only fair or poor" job, up from 63% in April.
The article then goes on to characterize "excellent or pretty good" as "positive", and "fair or poor" as "negative". Well, I'll grant them "poor", but since when is "fair" a negative assessment? If I say I think the President is doing a "fair" job (which I do), I don't mean that negatively. I mean that in a neutral-to-positive "not bad, but could be better" way.
So why not just break down the results as "excellent", "pretty good", "fair", and "poor"? Wouldn't that be fairer reporting?
Posted by Peter Dutton on May 12, 2006 5:53 PM | Politics | Permalink
TrackBack URL for this entry:
www.oobleck.com/mt3/mt-tb.cgi/1314
This page contains a single entry from the blog posted on May 12, 2006 5:53 PM.
The previous post in this blog was Dog bites man.
The next post in this blog is Not dead yet....
Many more can be found on the main index page or by looking through the archives.