Post a comment
Comments are moderated, and will not appear until the author has approved them.
Your Information
(Name and email address are required. Email address will not be displayed with the comment.)
Philosophy Bites Books
Edmonds and Warburton: Philosophy Bites Again
-
Edmonds and Warburton: Philosophy Bites
-
Edmonds and Warburton: Philosophy Bites Back
Support Philosophy Bites
- Donate in GB Pounds
- Donate in Euros
- Donate in US Dollars
- Subscribe
Payment Options
Tweets by @philosophybites
Tweets by @DavidEdmonds100
Your email address:
Powered by FeedBlitz
Subscribe
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- About Us
- Sponsorship
- Music
- Ethics Bites
- For iPhone Users
- Downloading Episodes
- NEWS
- On Facebook
- On Twitter
- Philosophy Bites Book
- A Little History of Philosophy
- Links to Past Episodes
- Nigel Warburton
- 325 Bites interviews arranged by theme
- 325 Bites interviews arranged alphabetically by interviewee
- 340 Bites Interviews Arranged Alphabetically by Interviewee
- 352 Bites Interviews Arranged Alphabetically by Interviewee
- 352 Bites Interviews Arranged by Theme
« John Campbell on Schizophrenia | Main | Colin McGinn on Descartes on Innate Knowledge »
January 25, 2013
Tom Sorell on Surveillance
What, if anything, is wrong with surveillance? How does it affect privacy? Why value privacy anyway? Tom Sorell explains his position on these issues in this episode of the Philosophy Bites podcast.
Listen to Tom Sorell on Surveillance
Philosophy Bites is made in association with the Institute of Philosophy
Posted at 01:42 PM in Ethics, Photography, Political Philosophy, Politics, Public Life, Surveillance | Permalink
Reblog (0)
Comments
Verify your Comment
Previewing your Comment
Posted by: |
This is only a preview. Your comment has not yet been posted.
Your comment could not be posted. Error type:
Your comment has been saved. Comments are moderated and will not appear until approved by the author. Post another comment
The letters and numbers you entered did not match the image. Please try again.
As a final step before posting your comment, enter the letters and numbers you see in the image below. This prevents automated programs from posting comments.
Having trouble reading this image? View an alternate.
Books by Nigel Warburton
-
Nigel Warburton: Philosophy: The Basics
-
Nigel Warburton: A Little History of Philosophy
-
Nigel Warburton: Free Speech: A Very Short Introduction
-
Nigel Warburton: The Basics of Essay Writing
-
Nigel Warburton: Thinking from A to Z
-
Nigel Warburton: Erno Goldfinger: The Life of an Architect
-
Nigel Warburton: Philosophy: The Essential Study Guide
-
Nigel Warburton: The Art Question
-
Nigel Warburton: Freedom: An Introduction with Readings
-
Nigel Warburton: Philosophy: The Classics
Books by David Edmonds
-
David Edmonds: Would You Kill the Fat Man?
-
David Edmonds: Caste Wars: The Philosophy of Discrimination
-
David Edmonds and John Eidinow: Rousseau's Dog: A Tale of Two Philosophers
-
David Edmonds and John Eidinow: Bobby Fischer Goes to War
-
David Edmonds and John Eidinow: Wittgenstein's Poker
Search
Recent Posts
- 365 Bites Podcast Interviews Arranged by Theme
- Gregory Currie on the Philosophy of Film
- Katherine Morris on Merleau-Ponty on the Body
- Michael Devitt on Experimental Semantics
- Steven Hyman on Categorising Mental Disorders
- Leif Wenar on Trade and Tyranny
- Katrin Flikschuh on Philosophy in Africa
- Carlo Rovelli on Philosophy and Physics
- John Worrall on Evidence-Based Medicine
Podcast RSS Feeds
- Philosophy: The Classics
- Philosophy Bites
- Ethics Bites
Categories
- Aesthetics
- Analytic Philosophy
- Ancient Philosophy
- Animals
- Applied Ethics
- Aquinas
- Aristotle
- Art
- Atheism
- Avicenna
- Beilef
- Bentham
- Berkeley
- Bias
- Bio-Ethics
- Biography
- Blackburn
- Books
- Buddhism
- Causation
- Chance
- Children
- Cohen
- Consciousness
- Consequentialism
- Continental Philosophy
- Courses
- Crane
- Current Affairs
- David Edmonds
- De Botton
- Death
- Dennett
- Derrida
- Descartes
- Dworkin
- Education
What a rich and unusual philosophical topic! I like the linkage of surveillance to loss of autonomy - I find it hard to say what is wrong with surveillance but I think you hit the nail on the head.
I would add concerns about the impossibility of controlling information once obtained. There is identity fraud (government departments are always losing disks). The phone hacking scandal and paparazzi intrusion are "unethical", because the publishing of information causes real harm to someones reputation though the subject may not have broken any law. Medical information made public can cause shame or jepodise a job. Finally, thinking of 1984, undemocratic governments of the future would undoubtedly use general surveillance data collected unguardedly now e.g. website tracking, social media, emails etc. to target political opponents. Information is power, and can be misused for purposes never originally intended.
Something you touched on, which I feel is crucial is also the issue of trust. Some employers take urine samples from employees to check for drug abuse. Others monitor their activities on computer, or using satnav tracking data. You could argue that employees working conscientiously should not object. However, by monitoring, the lack of trust shown in the relationship destroys something valuable. Trust is the currency of a relationship, so just by investigating your spouse, you are being unfaithful. I think this is why people object to overuse of CCTV etc. It damages the trust between government and governed. We all become a little more suspicious of each other.
Posted by: Jim Vaughan | February 01, 2013 at 12:19 PM
The key need that we might be talking about here is the freedom to be oneself - to fully express one's physical, emotional, intellectual, and spiritual matter and energy. We don't necessarily need privacy or lack of surveillance, but we do need the right to unconditional expression, at least in some spaces. We need to know that we can relax and be ourselves regularly and conveniently, so that we don't feel the need to repress anything (causing us to be sick and liable to explode at a later point in time) for very long. We can do that even with others watching, as long as we can trust those watching to support our need to be fully human, with all our weird and messy physical and mental outputs.
So, yeah, the core issue isn't any need for privacy, really, but a need for respect and unconditional support, at least in some areas we can easily access whenever we need to vent.
Posted by: Turil | February 04, 2013 at 05:57 PM