-
Co-Founder/CEO of
Boston, Massachusetts
emil [at] sotirov [dot] com
-
Emil on Twitter
Readers
Featured links
- Aidpage
- People Networks
- z a y k o
- Anti-Architecture Manifesto
Subscribe
- RSS feed
Categories
- aidpage
- architecture
- business
- food
- free ideas to Google
- juicetorrent
- our squirrels
- personal
- politics
- social
- technology
- uncategorized
- web
People I read
- Fred Wilson
- Umair Haque
- David Weinberger
- Brad Feld
- Simeon Simeonov
- Dave Winer
- Mashable
- Read/WriteWeb
- dana boyd (apophenia)
Archives
- October 2011 (1)
- January 2011 (2)
- February 2010 (1)
- January 2010 (1)
- September 2009 (1)
- May 2009 (1)
- February 2009 (1)
- November 2008 (4)
- October 2008 (3)
- September 2008 (5)
- August 2008 (3)
- July 2008 (3)
- June 2008 (1)
- May 2008 (1)
- March 2008 (4)
- February 2008 (3)
- July 2007 (1)
- May 2007 (1)
- April 2007 (4)
- March 2007 (1)
- February 2007 (2)
- October 2006 (2)
- September 2006 (6)
- August 2006 (1)
- July 2006 (2)
- May 2006 (1)
- April 2006 (4)
- March 2006 (1)
- February 2006 (2)
- January 2006 (1)
- December 2005 (3)
- November 2005 (2)
- October 2005 (8)
- September 2005 (8)
- August 2005 (5)
- July 2005 (4)
- March 2005 (3)
- February 2005 (1)
- December 2004 (2)
- November 2004 (3)
- October 2004 (4)
- September 2004 (3)
- August 2004 (2)
- July 2004 (1)
-
Anti-Architecture Manifesto
illustration by E.S.
Why Useless Architecture
If architecture is “locked” in the “universal chain” of mutual “exploitation” and “channeling” of human life – where every human practice is used for another practice’s goals – perpetuating, in this way, the general condition of instrumentality (nothing is important, including humans, because everything is instrumental), Useless Architecture would give presence to that suppressed human need to be loved for what you are, and not for what you perform. Everybody knows that need.
Exercise:
Design a house without interior space. Or, design the ruins of a building whose original function you do not know. Or, design a small summer house for a Parisian clochard – situated on the sidewalk of a small Parisian street or square. Do not try to meet any of his needs. In summer, he does not need a house at all. Use your professional architectural knowledge to give his life presence.
Why Destructured Architecture
If formal order, structural stability, and durability of buildings are established as architectural metaphors of institutional order, stability of power systems, and durability of ideologies, then, perhaps, Destructured Architecture would give presence to the basic human need for transcendence of given establishments, conditions, or constraints. To deconstruct a structure is a pleasure. Every child knows that.
Exercise:
Think of an institution or people you do not particularly like. Then, design for “them” a “shelter” that, while still standing, would really be “mature” for structural and formal disintegration, and would very clearly express that condition. Use your professional knowledge of formal order and structures the way a criminal with a medical degree would use a scalpel. Prepare a model and test/taste its tendency for formal and structural disintegration.
Why Ugly Architecture
If architecture is embodiment, expression, or a presence of human values, then, we could imagine appreciating Ugly Architecture the way we value people for courage, honesty, sensibility, and intelligence – and not necessarily for beautiful appearance. Designing Ugly Architecture would, perhaps, open our eyes wider to aspects of human existence beyond appearance.
Exercise:
Try to discern and describe for yourself what “ugliness” in architecture would be. Then, design an “ugly” house for your best friend. Observe the relief of not having to make the house “beautiful”. There is also, in your friend, an “embarrassed”, “poor”, “alienated” side that you, as a friend, see and understand. Give presence to that side too.
Note:
If you really like an exercise – repeat it.
Original title:
On the Need to Design Useless, Destructured, and Ugly Architecture
Published in:
Dimensions, no 7 (1993), 70-71
Journal of the College of Architecture and Urban Planning
University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan
Aditya Dev Sood (Editor of Dimensions at that time) called my article “The Anti-Architecture Manifesto.”
See related:
Discipline vs “Field” Discourse
{ 1 } Trackback
-
Emil Sotirov : Discipline vs. “Field” Discourse | March 10, 2010 at 11:40 pm | Permalink
[...] related: On the Need to Design Useless, Destructured, and Ugly Architecture (a.k.a. The Anti-Architecture [...]