3rd Annual Iowa 1:1 Institute

February 6, 2012 Nick Sauers No comments

If you’re new here, you may want to sub­scribe to this blog via e-mail or my RSS feed. I also am on Twit­ter. Thanks for visiting!

I’m extremely excited to offi­cially announce that the 3rd Annual Iowa 1:1 Insti­tute will be held on April 11 at the Events Cen­ter in Des Moines. The con­fer­ence was launched two years ago, and it was made pos­si­ble through the help of the one-to-one schools in Iowa. Iowa’s one-to-one schools con­tributed to the con­fer­ence by pro­vid­ing pre­sen­ters who had suc­cess­fully imple­mented one-to-one. Those pre­sen­ters along with the excite­ment around one-to-one have helped the con­fer­ence grow from approx­i­mately 600 atten­dees in year one to 1300 last year. Although the con­fer­ence con­sists of pre­dom­i­nantly Iowa edu­ca­tors, we have had atten­dees from all of the sur­round­ing states and even the east coast.

With CASTLE’s move to the Uni­ver­sity of Ken­tucky, we did make some changes to the con­fer­ence. How­ever, our pur­poses have remained the same.

  • Help Iowa’s 1:1 dis­tricts learn from each other about inno­v­a­tive teach­ing, learn­ing, and admin­is­tra­tive prac­tices that are occur­ring in their districts;
  • Build excite­ment and ‘buzz’ around 1:1 lap­top com­put­ing ini­tia­tives in the state; and
  • Help oth­ers who are inter­ested in 1:1 com­put­ing learn more about how to get started and be successful.

On Tues­day of last week Iowa one-to-one schools were invited to sign up for the con­fer­ence. That prelaunch has already led to nearly 300 reg­is­trants. If you are inter­ested in learn­ing more or par­tic­i­pat­ing, click on one of the links below:

  • Gen­eral details
  • Reg­is­ter
  • Present
  • Be a vendor

We hope you will be part of what has become the biggest, and we hope best, one-to-one con­fer­ence in the world!

Nick Sauers

 

Everything I Need To Know — About Education — I Learned In Kindergarten

February 2, 2012 Sam Gliksman 3 comments

Orig­i­nally posted on iPads in Edu­ca­tion net­work web­site - ipadeducators.ning.com/profiles/blogs/kindergarten

Authored by Sam Gliksman, Twitter: @samgliksman

I had some­what of an epiphany while doing a work­shop at a local ele­men­tary school recently. Walk­ing around and speak­ing to teach­ers and chil­dren it sud­denly dawned on me that many of the “rev­o­lu­tion­ary” edu­ca­tional changes that many of us have been call­ing for have already been around for quite a while — just talk a stroll down to the Kinder­garten classes.

If only the rest of school looked a lit­tle more like those class­rooms. In fact, eight impor­tant pil­lars of a 21st cen­tury edu­ca­tion can be found in most Kinder­garten class­rooms every day of the week:

1. PLAY

The first rule of Kinder­garten is to have fun. Our youngest stu­dents love com­ing to school, and if any child doesn’t seem happy then we make it a high pri­or­ity to find and rem­edy the prob­lem. Play is a highly effec­tive method of infor­mal learn­ing that requires imag­i­na­tion and cre­ativ­ity. Happy, play­ful chil­dren are not day­dream­ing and clock watch­ing — they are engaged and absorbed in their activ­i­ties. As chil­dren get older how­ever, play starts tak­ing a back seat to “aca­d­e­mics” … which are usu­ally pri­or­i­ties deter­mined by peo­ple in offices far away from the stu­dents’ actual class­room environment.

2. CREATE

Cre­ativ­ity is becom­ing lost in the shuf­fle of the cur­rent “back to basics” school move­ment. While cer­tainly required in any artis­tic endeavor, cre­ativ­ity is also a highly essen­tial cop­ing skill for our rapidly chang­ing lives in the 21st cen­tury. Our tod­dlers are con­stantly being encour­aged to think and play cre­atively. We even struc­ture the class­room phys­i­cally in an attempt to stim­u­late cre­ativ­ity — using bright col­ors, infor­mal seat­ing and allow­ing chil­dren ample room to move. Con­trast that to the staid col­ors and fixed rows of desks found in most upper school classes where “fol­low the norm” has replaced “think out of the box”.

A cou­ple of years ago I attended a lec­ture by Amer­i­can artist, Erik Wahl. As part of his pre­sen­ta­tion he splashed paint around a can­vas while cre­at­ing a por­trait on stage. After­wards he turned to the audi­ence and asked, “How many of you con­sider your­selves artists?”. Out of an audi­ence of sev­eral hun­dred peo­ple only a cou­ple of hands were raised. He then related how he often goes into pre-school classes and asks the very same ques­tion. The dif­fer­ence is that almost every hand in the room imme­di­ately shoots up. The sad fact is that school squashes our inner sense of cre­ativ­ity as we get older. Instead of inspir­ing our stu­dents to be imag­i­na­tive and cre­ate we tell them to fol­low the rules — “Do what I tell you to do … and make sure do it exactly the way I asked you to do it”.

3. SOCIALIZE

We under­stand that young chil­dren are social by nature and encour­age them to min­gle. We don’t seat them alone in fixed desks fac­ing the front of the room. Instead we allow them appro­pri­ate time to roam and social­ize. Impor­tantly, we rec­og­nize the value of get­ting them to work together in small groups. When they get older and try to work together we often label the activ­ity “cheat­ing”. They’re usu­ally told to sit alone, face the front and work qui­etly on their own. Social­iz­ing is con­sid­ered an extra-curricular activ­ity that has no place in seri­ous aca­d­e­mics … well, not until you get out into the workplace!

4. DISCOVER

Chil­dren are curi­ous and love to explore the world around them. They nat­u­rally observe, ask ques­tions and demand answers. Kinder­garten class might be spent explor­ing a bug brought in from the play­ground or lis­ten­ing to a story from a par­ent with an inter­est­ing pro­fes­sion. Their world is a play­ground that they con­stantly explore.

As they get older we tell them that their world is divided into nicely delin­eated courses with pre­de­ter­mined content. Important ques­tions and issues that would nor­mally require dis­cus­sion and expla­na­tion are shelved because they don’t fit into some arbi­trary course cur­ricu­lum. How many times do you hear “we don’t have time for that today”? If course­work is com­pleted then there might pos­si­bly be some time left to explore a topic of inter­est. In the mean­time, explo­ration is put on hold.

5. EXPERIENCE

Effec­tive learn­ing occurs when chil­dren build new under­stand­ings based on expe­ri­ences that help them con­struct new knowl­edge. Kinder­garten teach­ers help pro­vide a myr­iad of expe­ri­ences for their stu­dents. We don’t read about ham­sters — we keep a pet in class and observe how they eat. We might even allow each child to take the pet home for an evening. We encour­age chil­dren to bring things into class so that oth­ers can feel, taste, expe­ri­ence and learn from them. Their expe­ri­ences pro­vide a scaf­fold­ing for the chil­dren to build upon and extend what they already know. We under­stand that chil­dren learn most deeply and effec­tively through experience.

How­ever, con­tent is king when they get to the older grades. It seems that the only valid expe­ri­ence for learn­ing is read­ing from a text book or lis­ten­ing to a teacher.

6. EXPRESS

Mix­ing dif­fer­ent forms of media and com­mu­ni­ca­tion is an essen­tial com­po­nent of Kinder­garten class. Chil­dren look at pho­tos, lis­ten to music, watch video, tell sto­ries and of course, read books. We under­stand that peo­ple com­mu­ni­cate in a vari­ety of man­ners and we bring them into play in our classrooms.

In upper grades our entire world is expressed through text. For what­ever rea­son, it seems that the only valid form of express­ing knowl­edge is through text. Out of class they con­stantly inter­act and cre­ate video, music and more. In class, we have stu­dents read from text­books and almost exclu­sively require them to respond in writing.

7. MOVE

Chil­dren need to move. We all need to move. It’s healthy for both body and mind. We under­stand that in Kinder­garten. The fur­ni­ture is arranged to facil­i­tate move­ment and we often have chil­dren move around to dif­fer­ent parts of the room depend­ing on the activ­ity. Out­doors, it’s essen­tial to pro­vide time and equip­ment for play.

The mantra of upper school is to sit still and face the front. Classes are designed for quiet, motion­less, obe­di­ent activ­i­ties. That can be excru­ci­at­ingly dif­fi­cult for many students.

8. RELATE

Finally, in Kinder­garten we strive to make learn­ing as mean­ing­ful as pos­si­ble. Learn­ing has mean­ing as defined by its rel­e­vance to the lives of stu­dents. If chil­dren can’t relate to it then it won’t hold their interest.

On the other hand, the vast amount of bleary eyed, day­dream­ing stu­dents in upper grades is tes­ta­ment to the fact that they don’t relate to much of what passes for learn­ing in class. It’s usu­ally a pre­de­fined pack­age of con­tent defined by an “author­ity” sit­ting far from the lives of our stu­dents — phys­i­cally and emo­tion­ally. Just as impor­tantly, this pre­de­fined con­tent pack­age is becom­ing increas­ingly inad­e­quate in prepar­ing our stu­dents for their lives after school.

So if you have a few moments I’d strongly encour­age you to take a stroll down to the lower grades in your school. In fact, the lower the bet­ter. Spend a few min­utes observ­ing the dynam­ics in class. Note the energy, laugh­ter and enthu­si­asm … the gen­uine thirst for learn­ing. Then ask your­self why it can’t be that way through­out school.

Sam Gliks­man
samgliksman@gmail.com
Twit­ter: @samgliksman
http:\\ipadeducators.ning.com

What if or yeah but?

February 1, 2012 Nick Sauers No comments

I spent the day on Fri­day work­ing with a school in Ken­tucky that is actively seek­ing ways to enrich the learn­ing expe­ri­ences for their stu­dents. The super­in­ten­dent kicked-off the meet­ing with other school lead­ers with a clear direc­tive for the meet­ing. He wanted the group to think and talk about “what if” state­ments. The group dis­cussed some pos­si­ble “what if” state­ments, but more impor­tantly they planned to do the same with their staffs.

As I sat in on the meet­ing, a cou­ple of dif­fer­ent thoughts came to mind. The first was that every school has staff mem­bers with ideas about how to change their school. My sec­ond thought was that schools all too often fail to “dream” about the pos­si­bil­i­ties for the school. All too often schools get in the habit of talk­ing about ideas in “yeah, but” terms instead of “what if” terms.

  • Yeah, but the par­ents at our school won’t sup­port that.
  • Yeah, but our stu­dents won’t do that.
  • Yeah, but our bud­get doesn’t allow for that.
I would be the first to admit that I cer­tainly can be a “yeah, but” type of per­son. I am very prac­ti­cal at times, and I some­times quickly dis­miss ideas that don’t seem prac­ti­cal. Unfor­tu­nately, that atti­tude isn’t one that always har­nesses cre­ative and inno­v­a­tive ideas. As schools look for ways to change and trans­form, they should cer­tainly take the time to have some con­ver­sa­tions about the what ifs.
  • What if we involved stu­dents in impor­tant school decisions?
  • What if stu­dents were chal­lenged with work that was relavent to them?
  • What if teach­ers rou­tinely observed each oth­ers classrooms?
I have had the oppor­tu­nity to learn from design thinkers Chris­t­ian Long and John Nash, who is a col­league. Their work is extremely relavent to schools try­ing to redesign them­selves. One major con­cept that I heard cen­ters around the devel­op­ment of ideas. In that stage it is crit­i­cal to focus on gen­er­at­ing ideas, and not eval­u­at­ing ideas (What ifs vs. yeah buts). A sec­ond idea is that we have to be will­ing to fail. This doesn’t nec­es­sar­ily mean that you gam­ble on one huge change for an entire dis­trict at the same time. It may involve pilots or phased imple­men­ta­tion of an initiative.
If you work at a one-to-one school, some­one at some point cer­tainly dreamed of inno­va­tion and change. Beyond imple­ment­ing one-to-one, has your school con­tin­ued to have real con­ver­sa­tions about the “what ifs” for your school? If not, it may cer­tainly be time to have those conversations!
Nick Sauers

Keeping Students Engaged in a 1:1 Project-Based Classroom [guest post]

January 29, 2012 Scott McLeod 5 comments

spacer

Image approved for copy by Cre­ative Commons.

Source: bit.ly/vYUkXB

 

When lap­tops first arrived in my class­room, I wor­ried about class­room man­age­ment. How could I cre­ate an envi­ron­ment where stu­dents used their com­put­ers as tools rather than toys?

I was wor­ried for noth­ing. The fol­low­ing are sug­ges­tions for keep­ing stu­dents engaged in a project and account­able for their time with computers:

Stu­dents make a plan.

Stu­dents are most tempted to open wid­gets, games, and social chats when they are faced with a blank screen and have no plan.

Much of the time, stu­dents think they have a plan. If you ask them What are you going to do?, the answer is usu­ally I’m gonna make a Power Point about… or I want to make a movie about… Those answers indi­cate that stu­dents are think­ing of tech­nol­ogy before content.

Instead, ask What are you try­ing to learn? or What are you try­ing to com­mu­ni­cate? or What are you work­ing on as a writer? Those ques­tions get answers like I want to know more about the horses that Civil War gen­er­als rode or I want to con­vince peo­ple that Justin Bieber is the best singer ever or I’m try­ing to describe the character’s actions.

When you ask about learn­ing and com­mu­ni­ca­tion, you are sig­nal­ing that the con­tent is more impor­tant than the tech­nol­ogy. Pull aside those who are strug­gling with plans. Let them talk together and encour­age them to sketch their ideas with dia­grams or bul­let points and return to the com­puter later. Stu­dents with a plan tend to stay on task.

Stu­dents set time-bound goals.

Once stu­dents have a plan, they break the project into smaller tasks that can be fin­ished in 10– to 15-minute chunks of time. Have stu­dents write the spe­cific tasks on Post-it notes. Post-its are set beside the com­puter. On their Post-its, stu­dents fin­ish the sen­tence, “In the next [x-amount of] min­utes, I plan to…” They gen­er­ally write things like…

Tasks should be spe­cific. I’m gonna work on my project is not spe­cific enough. At the end of class, Post-its become “exit slips”. Stu­dents tick off the tasks they have com­pleted and hand the Post-its to the teacher so the teacher can see the progress.

Lap­top screens are “fisted” or “put at half mast”. spacer

Teach­ers don’t lec­ture much in a project-based learn­ing envi­ron­ment. How­ever, some­times stu­dent work time is inter­rupted so the teacher can give reminders or clar­ify directions.

Ask stu­dents to “fist” their com­puter (or “put the screen at half mast”). Screens should be gen­tly low­ered so that stu­dents’ fists fit between the edge of the track pad and the screen.

When screens are fisted, stu­dents are not dis­tracted by items on their screen nor can they type. At the same time, stu­dents do not lower their screens to the point that the com­put­ers go to sleep. In an iPad envi­ron­ment, stu­dents might care­fully face their screens down on the desk.

Fin­gers indi­cate the amount of time stu­dents need to com­plete a shorter task.

Some tasks are shorter and need to be com­pleted within a few min­utes of class. After stu­dents have worked for a rea­son­able amount of time, ask stu­dents to show fin­gers for how many addi­tional min­utes they need. Fisted com­put­ers sig­nal completion.

If a stu­dent is far behind the rest of the class, try to deter­mine whether the stu­dent got dis­tracted or if the stu­dent needs reteach­ing. Have the stu­dent take a screen­shot of his or her progress. Screen­shots are help­ful to guide future conversations.

Cir­cu­late the room, con­fer­enc­ing with students.

Walk­ing and talk­ing with stu­dents is impor­tant with or with­out com­put­ers. In her arti­cle 10 Ways to be a Ter­ri­ble Teacher, Vicki Davis describes the ter­ri­ble teacher as one who is work­ing on his or her own com­puter and not pay­ing atten­tion to students.

Stu­dents wel­come teacher con­ver­sa­tion. They are eager to share their progress and request advice when they’re stuck. You build rela­tion­ships with stu­dents when you talk to them about their work.

Rather than ban­ning chat, teach stu­dents how to use it for collaboration.

Chat fea­tures are pro­grammed into Gmail and Google prod­ucts. The first year, I banned chats. Then, I real­ized that chats can be used for stu­dent collaboration.

I glance at the chat win­dows as I cir­cu­late the room. Since stu­dents have spe­cific, time-bound goals, most chats are used to ask peers to look over a para­graph or help with another aspect of the project.

Don’t be afraid to have tough con­ver­sa­tions with indi­vid­ual students.

Each year, I have to pull aside one or two stu­dents to talk about time man­age­ment. It’s not a puni­tive con­ver­sa­tion. The con­ver­sa­tion goes some­thing like this:

I’ve noticed you haven’t made much progress on…I need to know what’s get­ting in the way of your progress. I’m not ask­ing because I want to get you in trou­ble. I’m ask­ing because you’re now x-years old and I’m wor­ried that, if you get in the habit of…,then school will be really hard for you in the future.

Many of the sug­ges­tions above apply to project-based learn­ing envi­ron­ments both with and with­out com­put­ers. The trick in a 1:1 envi­ron­ment is to main­tain focus on learn­ing and com­mu­ni­ca­tion. Then let tech­nol­ogy nat­u­rally enhance those outcomes.

What tricks do you use to keep stu­dents engaged?

spacer

Janet Moeller-Abercrombie is the author of Expat Edu­ca­tor. She has 16 years of teach­ing expe­ri­ence and cur­rently works full time at Hong Kong Inter­na­tional School. Janet is a doc­toral can­di­date with the Uni­ver­sity of Min­nesota and has begun cur­ricu­lum con­sult­ing with admin­is­tra­tors and teach­ers. She is cer­ti­fied by the National Board for Pro­fes­sional Teach­ing Stan­dards. @jabbacrombie

 

Creating a welcoming web presence

January 23, 2012 Nick Sauers 4 comments

I have worked the past cou­ple of weeks on get­ting pre­pared to dis­trib­ute a sur­vey to teach­ers through­out the state of Iowa. Part of that work included vis­it­ing school web­sites and col­lect­ing teacher emails. With the help of a friend, I ended up col­lect­ing approx­i­mately 4,000 emails from 140 dif­fer­ent schools.  As you can imag­ine, the look and feel of those school web­sites var­ied greatly. My expe­ri­ence vis­it­ing those web­sites brought for­ward the fol­low­ing issues.

When I vis­ited web­sites, I often won­dered what the pur­pose of the web­site was.  I would guess that the pur­pose each school had for its web­site would explain some of the dif­fer­ences between web­sites. Most of the web­sites seemed to fit into one of two categories.

Sta­tic repos­i­tory of information-These web­sites were obvi­ously updated or changed very infre­quently. They con­tained forms and var­i­ous resources about the school. This would by far be the larger category.

Fluid infor­ma­tion source-These web­sites were updated fre­quently, and they con­tained cur­rent news about the school. Some included videos, pic­tures, and even twit­ter feeds.

This post isn’t intended as a crit­i­cism of schools, but rather as a con­ver­sa­tion starter. As a school, you need to decided where to spend your time and resources. Keep­ing an up to date web­site cer­tainly takes time. With that in mind, I’m going to end with a list of poten­tial rea­sons to invest in updat­ing your web­site and a list of the com­mon prob­lems I found on websites.

Why invest time to keep an up to date website?

Com­mon prob­lems and frus­tra­tions with school websites:

Visit your own web­site and click around on var­i­ous resources. What mes­sage does your school web­site send?

Characteristics of 1:1 Schools and Communities

January 6, 2012 Nick Sauers 13 comments

This is my first blog of the New Year, and first post for some time. I’d like to say that my depar­ture from blog­ging has been due to a trip to warm Phoenix to see my Hawkeyes play in the Insight Bowl, but unfor­tu­nately that isn’t the case. I’ve instead been work­ing on my dis­ser­ta­tion, which will attempt to ana­lyze the impact of one-to-one schools across the state of Iowa. Some of my ini­tial find­ings have been very inter­est­ing, but I share them with a dis­claimer. These are very pre­lim­i­nary find­ings, and I may be over­sim­pli­fy­ing them a bit. I am still work­ing to clean-up the data, but I thought these very crude results may be of inter­est to some of you. If you’d like to find out more, feel free to send me an email so we can chat (nck0208@gmail.com).

spacer

The ini­tial part of my study attempted to ana­lyze the char­ac­ter­is­tics of one-to-one schools. The goal was to iden­tify char­ac­ter­is­tics of one-to-one schools that were very dif­fer­ent (sta­tis­ti­cally sig­nif­i­cant) from non-one-to-one schools. Because I didn’t want the char­ac­ter­is­tics to be impacted as a result of a school going one-to-one, I used data from a year that schools were not one-to-one (2007). Here are some of those char­ac­ter­is­tics that were very dif­fer­ent between one-to-one and non-one-to-one schools.

It is impor­tant to stress a cou­ple of points with these data.

  1. I didn’t report items above sim­ply if one group had a higher median. They were only reported if there was a sta­tis­ti­cally sig­nif­i­cant dif­fer­ence. I actu­ally com­pared schools on nearly 100 dif­fer­ent char­ac­ter­is­tics, most of which didn’t show dif­fer­ences between the two groups.
  2. These results are NOT  results of 1:1! These data were col­lected prior to one to-one imple­men­ta­tion in an effort to describe the “type” of schools that were the first in Iowa to tran­si­tion to one-to-one (41 schools).
  3. I have over­sim­pli­fied these results a bit, and they aren’t yet finalized!
Char­ac­ter­is­tics of 1:1 Schools/Communities in Iowa

Even with those dis­claimers above, I have found these results EXTREMELY inter­est­ing. There are some I cer­tainly would have expected, and oth­ers that were more surprising.

Nick Sauers

Addressing issues with reality

December 15, 2011 Nick Sauers 2 comments

Edu­ca­tion Week recently reported on a study that looked at the preva­lence of sex­ting among youth ages 10–17. That report cited two dis­tinct stud­ies that indi­cated a sur­pris­ingly small per­cent­age of stu­dents were involved in sex­ting as they defined it. My point in high­light­ing their arti­cle isn’t to weigh-in on the issue of sex­ting.  Rather, my objec­tive is to stress how impor­tant i

gipoco.com is neither affiliated with the authors of this page nor responsible for its contents. This is a safe-cache copy of the original web site.