You are here: Logical Fallacies > Alan Johnson on the Comprehensive Spending Review: "This is what they came into politics for"

Alan Johnson on the Comprehensive Spending Review: “This is what they came into politics for”

October 26, 2010 at 7:35 pm

In last week’s Comprehensive Spending Review, the Chancellor George Osborne set out a four-year plan to scale back the British public sector. This will mean cuts deeper than Thatcher’s across almost all areas of government. He and his colleagues in government argue that the cuts are necessary to bring Britain back from the brink of bankruptcy, but many fear that they will push the UK into back into recession, hitting the poor and vulnerable particularly hard in the process. (more…)

“People who viewed this product bought this…”

October 22, 2010 at 7:18 am

One of the most powerful ideas in advertising is the idea that everyone is doing it. Whether you’re looking for a holiday destination, buying a mobile phone, or just choosing a new CD, most people are more likely to get out their wallets if they think that other people are doing the same.

This is one reason why Amazon has those ‘X% of people who viewed this bought this’ boxes. This is more than just cross-promotion, more than just suggesting products related to the one that you’ve shown an interest in; it’s a subtle endorsement of the decision to buy, appealing to the fact that lots of other people have done the same. “How could it be a mistake when so many people have done it?” Or, to make the old trope unmistakable, “Millions can’t be wrong”.

Persuasive though this train of thought can be, it lacks logical rigour. Popular decisions can be mistakes; millions can be wrong. And if X% of people have messed up and bought rubbish, then you wouldn’t want to join them.

Blog

  • Alan Johnson on the Comprehensive Spending Review: “This is what they came into politics for”
  • “People who viewed this product bought this…”

Fallacies of Relevance

  • Ad Hominem (Personal Attack)
  • Bandwagon Fallacy
  • Fallacist’s Fallacy
  • Fallacy of Composition
  • Fallacy of Division
  • Gambler’s Fallacy
  • Genetic Fallacy
  • Irrelevant Appeals
    • Appeal to Antiquity / Tradition
    • Appeal to Authority
    • Appeal to Consequences
    • Appeal to Force
    • Appeal to Novelty
    • Appeal to Pity
    • Appeal to Popularity
    • Appeal to Poverty
    • Appeal to Wealth
  • Moralistic Fallacy
  • Naturalistic Fallacy
  • Red Herring
  • Weak Analogy

Fallacies of Ambiguity

  • Accent Fallacies
  • Equivocation Fallacy
  • Straw Man Fallacy

Fallacies of Presumption

  • Affirming the Consequent
  • Arguing from Ignorance
  • Begging the Question / Circular Reasoning
  • Complex Question Fallacy
  • Cum Hoc Fallacy
  • False Dilemma / Bifurcation Fallacy
  • Hasty Generalisation Fallacy
  • ‘No True Scotsman’ Fallacy
  • Post Hoc Fallacy
  • Slippery Slope Fallacy
  • Sweeping Generalisation Fallacy
  • Subjectivist Fallacy
  • Tu Quoque Fallacy
gipoco.com is neither affiliated with the authors of this page nor responsible for its contents. This is a safe-cache copy of the original web site.