What matters in what comments your audience sees?

One thing businesses obsess about is customer/audience sentiment online. Negative reviews, scathing blog posts, ugly tweets.

The question is, how much do negative vs. positive comments affect your audience? As usual, there are many variables, but a recent study offers a few clues into how variables come together to influence sentiment.

The first clue is that well-known trusted brands are less impacted by negative commentary because the recognized brand name automatically puts the audience in what the researchers call “promotion orientation” (as opposed to “prevention orientation”). The bad news is that if your business is already struggling with a poor reputation, this is likely to automatically put your audience into “prevention orientation” mode, and in turn they will be more influenced by negative commentary.

Another clue is in how much information is presented. Similar to studies that show people can only handle a small cognitive load of choices, so too can they only typically process a few brand comments, and are thus likely to rely only on a few comments and additionally will take more seriously those comments that reflect their orientation to “promotion orientation” or “prevention orientation”:

When provided with a large number of mixed commentaries, promotion- and prevention-oriented individuals were biased in expected ways, positively or negatively. Under high information loads, individuals’ processing capacity was limited so they relied on only a subset of available information to simplify the judgment process. But this changed when only a few commentaries were provided. “When information load is low, individuals have higher cognitive capacity to process inconsistent information,” the authors write.

While this is only one study, what can you take away from this?

If you’re already a strong brand, don’t spend too much time worrying about negative brand comments. Obviously it’s important to listen and respond to customer complaints, but this is probably enough to attenuate negative comments.

If you’re an unknown or struggling brand, negative comments matter more. Monitoring social media is important as well as responding in a timely manner and making responses public, as well as following up with responses by making appropriate changes internally. You can further strengthen these responses by publicly announcing changes to products, customer service, your website etc that are a result of negative feedback.

Additionally, budget priorities should go towards customer relations and gaining positive reviews that are search engine friendly.

Lastly, no matter how strong or weak your brand, remember that your audience will only process small amounts of information at a time. So when using testimonials, highlight the most important through layout and design so that your audience can quickly scan and get the “gist” from just a few testimonials.

*Photo credit: geishaboy500 

Our brain is wired for “first impressions”.

Imagine how combining the power of insight from marketing, neuromarketing, behavioral economics, psychology, evolutionary sciences, neuroeconomics, and other such disciplines can be combined to:

How many times a day do you need to sway someone to your point of view, or get them to do something you want them to do? How you say it can make all the difference according to a team of scientists at University of Michigan.

According to a recent study, brands like Corona that define their brand with narrow associations do better than brands that try to be too many things to too many people.

Last year Volkswagon launched TheFunTheory.com, an initiative that builds on the principles of nudge theory to influence behavior towards healthy or positive actions through the use of FUN. Check out the site. There’s a garbage can in a park with sound effects, a video game glass recycling machine, a “speed trap” lottery that awards law-abiding drivers with prizes, and more.

It’s time for conferences to think outside the box on networking, designed with human nature in mind. Events that reduce anxiety, that facilitate putting the right people together, and have opportunities for interaction built in. If the real value of a conference is the networking, than ensure its value.

Ran across this video today about Nudge theory, a behavioral economics concept. I share it because it illustrates how the smallest changes in presentation can make big changes in human behavior.

Oxytocin, mirror neurons, dopamine, in-group jumping, social proof…the list goes on. Social media and social good are clearly symbiotic and when social media is intelligently leveraged, the opportunities to affect social change are immense.

Neuromarketing firm NeuroFocus made big news when they unveiled their new Mynd dry, wireless, EEG headset at the recent 2011 ARF conference in New York City. I wasn’t able to make it to the conference to see Mynd in action for myself, but I did get a chance to speak with NeuroFocus CEO AK Pradeep by phone.