Email:
Password: Login Cancel
« Previous WTF Catwoman! | Those Are Some Special Skills Next »
Light Reading And Heavy Petting
Share
Submitted by: dunno source via Submit Page
It’s 1979, on the cusp of a new decade and we’re ready to toss our inhibitions to the wind.
-Joe Hawtness
afufle!: p = picture
a = p contains high “WTF” value
b = p contains a woman
set u (“Unrelated”) states: “WTF photos and videos”
p (photo) is a potential member of set u if and only if a
set h (“Hawtness”) states: “The women of WTF”
p is a potential member of set h if and only if a AND b
This photo is highly weird and elicited a “wtf”. The (human) subject is presumably female.
this picture is both WTF and contains a woman, therefore, p is a potential member of BOTH set u and set h
photo is valid
but still very creepy
This is amazing.
-
Share on Facebook
-
Email
-
Copy & paste this:
You May Like:
This was posted on Wednesday, March 17th, 2010 at 10:00 am
uhhhhhh… wtf… is there peanut butter involved
I’ve not seen this particular book, but I’ve seen a few just like it and if the cover art isn’t enough for you the contents should be. UGH!
Bad Fido! BAD DOG!
“A pet book”. Doh.
wtf that dog isn’t Fabio
Okay. so the cover art wasn’t just a big misunderstanding:
www.aeclassics.net/PBPage03.html
This book along with other classics like Beast-Raped Mom And Daughter, Animal Farm Orgy, …
www.jonathankellerman.com/ ..all I’m sayin. Nice pug, John.
More like, “Good doggy! Good boy!”
And they call it…
This is just gross.
Photoshopped. That doesn’t look like a real dog to me.
nice tits
hawtness this is not
I thought I had clicked on Picture Is Unrelated, but its Hawtness……wtf dude, how’d this get picked?
p = picture
a = p contains high “WTF” value
b = p contains a woman
set u (“Unrelated”) states: “WTF photos and videos”
p (photo) is a potential member of set u if and only if a
set h (“Hawtness”) states: “The women of WTF”
p is a potential member of set h if and only if a AND b
This photo is highly weird and elicited a “wtf”. The (human) subject is presumably female.
this picture is both WTF and contains a woman, therefore, p is a potential member of BOTH set u and set h
photo is valid
but still very creepy
best part of that website is the pic of him with an akward smile holding a dog.
they say “write what you know!”
Ah,…skin so smooth, like a peach. Looks like it’s fixing to get “Ruff’d” up
Ugh, I actually conversed with a woman like that on a random site once. She argued that it was perfectly natural, and in no way wrong, since her dog enjoyed it so much. I kind of wanted to smash her face with a brick.
Gives new meaning to the term: “Doggy Style”
I’m always happy to discover sick perverse materials like this, cuz it makes me feel so gosh darn normal and wholesome. And a touch aroused…I mean, there IS a boob in the picture. And the dog totally slappin dat ass? Shoot, that’s hot as hell.
i’m pretty sure that john kellerman and the one that wrote the above book are two different people. i mean he seems fairly well known and seems to deal mostly in non-ew-we’re-all-gonna-burn-in-hell-for-this sorta books. i dunno. maybe the pug is trying to warn us.
So yer snatch is so stanky a dog wouldn’t tough it? LOL
The dog is thinking “Jeeze lady, come on, let’s get this over with, I have a mail man to bark at at 2:30″
It’s a drawing, not a photo.
googled the title, it is online here neatopotato.net/xnovel/pb219-a-girls-best-friend the damn girl is in a three-way with a horse and the dog by the bottom of the page. Is this really THE Johnathan Kellerman? Geez he has come a long way!
Girl and dog…OK.
Girl is hawt and naked…WTF?
Dog is feeling up hawt naked girl’s ass…GTFO!
Hawt girl is in the process of slipping off panties……..
OMFGWTFBBQ!!!!
That does it; the hawtness is gone. And the book is EXACTLY what it appears to be?
God damn, I feel like dry-heaving. The bad thing is, I’m aware of ppl sick enough to do that…
Personally, I would have preferred “The Big Book of Lesbian Horse Stories” and yet, it is fascinating that there are people so desperate to be a published author (“I wrote a book!”) that they will stoop to anything — and even keep their name from that book for their subsequent works. There probably is a fascinating story behind how this book came to be — a pity Mr. Kellerman hasn’t written it.
Why is it that a dildo, that is an inanimate plastic object, does not raise hackles in anyone except a fundamentalist Christian? (and a fundamentalist Muslim. Have you noticed there is an unbelievable lot of common ground between the two?) And yet, a dog, living, loving, wagging it’s tail, is totally unacceptable. Why? I mean, why, as long as a dildo IS acceptable?
LMFAOROF^^^ Win
Wrong Jonathon Kellerman
This is more of a question of ethics than religion. The majority of society (religious or not) feels that bestiality is wrong. If you really want to know, some (more strict versions of) religions also feel that pleasuring oneself is wrong.
“Oh @#$! how can I screw this hot babe now?” or
“WTF? You mean I go seconds after Fido???”
Kate (from the TV series LOST by Evangeline Lilly) gets bored, real bored.
the drawing has been photoshopped
Master, I go back and forth between two answers. Pick one:
1) Because we’re different species, and in general we don’t have sex with different species. On the other hand, a dildo is just a tool.
2) You’re crazy. Go fuck a dog for all I care.
damn it. I just sent him fan mail…
Rule 14
Yeah, no it’s not. Sadly, it’s a real book.
There’s certain things you don’t have sex with. Kids, dead people, and animals, because it’s just sick, perverted, and wrong.
Just when I think the internet can’t get any weirder . . .
That bitch is hot!
further-more and still sadly.
it’s a real drawing on a real book. Both a artist and a author thought about this for awhile before doing it……….
Animals have sex with other animals all the time.
And we are just animals with a big ego.
A artist? A author? Try “an” next time.
Oh, people dry-heave all the time, it possibly natural in cases like this.
Oddly enough, the first thing that popped in my head was that the girl taking off her panties looks a bit like Meghan Fox.
$2.95, that’s pretty cheap
@Milo – haha, nice!
Thanks for letting us know.
Now then, could you look into whether the ocean contains water?
Sadly, for Otto, there would be no next time.
No, it doesn’t.
Well done! Thank you, Coyttl!
Except without the deformed mutant thumbs.
Well, of course they have to stoop down. Dogs are low to the ground, y’know.
Grammar Nazi! You forgot I didn’t capitalize my sentences jack-off.
Thanks for playing.
hahahahahhahaha
That bitch looks like Megan Fox!!