Talking to The TV
www.nbcsandiego.com/blogs/press-here/Google-Patent-shows-its-working-on-voice-control-for-Google-TV-140222103.html
.. I suspect this is in response to rumors of a Siri enabled Apple TV product being released end of 2012.
I think a big takeaway is that as the iPhone overnight mainstreamed gestural controls , we need to be prepared for voice control starting to feature more in TV UI/UX.
Even if this ends up being a folly, once Google and Apple, have a go, all the other TV manufacturers will most likely follow suit.
I don’t believe voice will replace everything a 5 button remote can do, but will augment the experience, in the same way that gestures on mobile/tablet are a layer over the traditional point and click. A big difference for TV is that the cost of switching modes is finding and picking up the remote as well as a complete mental switch from language to spatial navigation; a kind of inertia.
My suspicion is that it will influence that first 30 seconds where a user starts casual and then decides if they need to take the interaction to the remote.
The wildcard here is the ability for agents like Siri to facilitate the construction of a complex query and course of action through a conversation.
The cynic in me thinks that if conversational interfaces work and become the norm, we will be able to devote a lot less pixels to navigational prompts.. making more space for advertising :)
If the weak link in this,the voice recognition, fails to live up to expectations this could be a farce. As impressive progress as Siri is, it has not really lived up to expectations, so if Apple do introduce a TV with a Siri like function as a major component, I’m expecting it to bomb. … but deep inside, I want it to work and be a surprise and a delight.
Related…
forums.appleinsider.com/showthread.php?threadid=133953
The other possibility to this one, is that Apple are going to have a companion device with their TV half way in size between an iPhone and iPad – which would be just about the right size.
My Life In IPTV
I was asked by a company to write about myself and my IPTV experience. I’ve left a lot out but here are the highlights.
James has been playing with computers on and off since he can remember. As a youth he cut his teeth on the periphery of the Australian demo scene and BBS underground of the 80’s and early 90’s. He then followed his passion by studying Computer Science.
During this time James became fascinated with using the computer as a visual instrument and developed software and hardware for the Amiga and later on the PC to allow output from the computer to be input to televisions and video projectors. James performed audio visual displays at various nightclubs with DJs and bands as well as using his knowledge of networking to set up live CB-Chat, IRC and CU-SeeMe hook-ups with the audience.
In the early 90’s he set up a warehouse, internet cafe and free ISP for electronic artists in Sydney Australia and co-founded the and ‘Kollektive’ and ‘Clan Analogue’ record labels.
In the process of getting electronic artists online, James started looking into cheap hardware solutions that would enable people to use the internet via their TV. This led to research into the software and hardware required to create a product that would allow the general public to interact with internet services on their TV.
This lead to the founding of a start-up, a crash course in importing, supply chain management, hardware manufacturing and some lucrative contracts in Asia just in time for the Asian Currency Crisis to wipe out all his clients.
James continued to develop software and take a keen interest in IPTV and started working at Massive Interactive in 1998 first as Technical Director and then as Chief Technical Officer, a role he remains in today.
While at Massive Interactive James was able to use his skills with Sky and Austar, a local satellite TV provider via development of many interactive “Red Button” style applications using the OpenTV platform.
For the first two seasons of Australian “Big Brother”, James ran the official IRC server that had a client that would also allow OpenTV, Java and Linux based devices to project the chat into the TV with the show.
In 2005 James architected and built the Telstra/BigPond Movies application for Windows Media Centre, PC, ViiV, Xbox 360 and DLNA devices. This allowed users to download movies and television episodes and watch them on their TV. This was nominated for an Technical Emmy.
In 2007 James designed, architected and built the innovative Telstra/BigPond V8Supercars project which ran on Windows Media Center, PC and the Microsoft Xbox-360. This took live television feeds from the devices digital receiver and combined it with internet video and telemetry data streams from within the car. This innovative application synchronised these three feeds together to give the user and multiview experience and allowed users to mix and match views of car exterior, in car and telemetry an leader-board information on their TV using their remote control. This was nominated for an Technical Emmy. Did I mention that it was innovative?
Since then James’s and Massive’s skills in the area of IPTV video on demand, catch-up and subscription services have been in high demand in various companies around the world. Understandably this has kept him fairly busy.
James sees the emergence of Trick-Play/Time-Shifting and the erosion of audience and advertising revenue as a major threat to the free-to-air market. Combining that with his experience managing and formulating live competitive and interactive events James believes that we will start to see the emergence free to air broadcasts with a time critical interactive element to keep users engaged in “real time”.
The great thing about Massive is that it really is a full service company when it comes to IPTV. User experience design, user interface design, front end development, back end development, systems integration, solution design, architecture and project and delivery management. We design and develop IPTV applications at each every stage of the production pipeline.
While originally Massive developed multi-platform libraries in Flash, JavaScript and C/C++ our new UI Library developed in the HaXe language and various cross-compilers allows us to practically target multiple platforms with a single code-base.
James has experimented with many single screen modes of interactivity and sees the new multi-modal/multi-device landscape as particularly exciting. The new Massive UI library means that the time and effort between an idea and a practical experiment is now greatly reduced.
WebTV 2.0
As you may notice from my lack of posts, I’ve been rather busy for the last three years.
History
What is IPTV?
Where Are We Now?
The Devices
Connected Televisions
These are Televisions that contain some kind of middleware that let you run applications.
Check out Sony, LG and Samsung (Who publish a really good SDK).
These TVs are fairly modern so the software development process around these is thankfully sensibly “standards” based.
Custom Set-Top Boxes
The PC
Companion Devices
The Publishing Model
The Integration Model
The Future
So back to the transition phase I mentioned previously This is similar to what we are now seeing the tail end of in the mobile market.
In a just a handful of years we are going to end up with 99% of phones running just 3 operating systems. iOS, Android and Microsoft.
The Devices
- Generic devices based on standards based browsers. (covered above).
- Personal Set-Top Boxes/Televisions.
Personal Set-Top Boxes/Televisions
Into this category I place Apple TV, Google TV and the probably soon to be announced Windows TV solution.
The Publishing Model
The Integration Model
As a service provider you will no longer have to ship or design your own device.
IPTV devices will be products that people will already have. They will have bought them from a store. The same way that one now buys a TV, PC or mobile phone (outright purchase off a plan).
People will choose the one that suits them or just use the one