spacer spacer
spacer spacer
spacer spacer spacer spacer
spacer spacer
  • Blog
  • Twitter
  • About Us
  • News
  • Press / Media
  • Legislation/Policy
Get E-Mail Alerts



Important Links

  • Election Day Problems?
    Call 1-866-OUR-VOTE
  • Find Your Polling Place: Vote411.org
  • Questions? Contact Us
  • Vote Trust USA - national resource for state-based organizations supporting verifiable elections, a Verified Voting Foundation project
  • spacer

    Super Tuesday Snapshot 2012

    March 6, 2012 - 7 States hold primary elections today: Georgia, Massachusetts, Ohio, Oklahoma, Tennessee, Vermont, and Virginia.

    spacer

    Key facts:

    40% of Super Tuesday voters will have to use paperless electronic voting systems on election day. All of Georgia, and the vast majority of Tennessee and Virginia precincts, are paperless. 16% of Super Tuesday voters will use electronic voting machines with a voter-verifiable paper record. Over 50 counties in Ohio use these systems. All of Massachusetts, Oklahoma, and Vermont, as well as approximately 30 Ohio counties, use voter-marked paper ballots. Over 20 jurisdictions in Virginia, including Fairfax County, use paper ballots as the standard voting system.

    Of the 7 Super Tuesday states, only Ohio
    will definitely conduct a post-election audit of electronic vote tallies. Vermont's Secretary of State may order an audit within 30 days of the election.

    Nationwide, 25%
    of the nation's registered voters will have to use paperless electronic voting machines on Election Day (November 6).

    For
    67% of American voters, voter-marked paper ballots are the standard voting system. 37% of the voters live where paper ballots are the sole voting method and accessible ballot marking devices serve voters with disabilities; 30% live in areas where paper ballots are the standard voting system and electronic voting machines are deployed for accessibility.

    Half the states will conduct
    manual-count audits of electronic vote tallies. Hand-counted audits of machine tallies are essential to verified elections; without audits, paper ballots or paper records add little security value.Some planned audits will be weak audits, such as in Florida, where the audit will be conducted after the election is certified, and only one item on a large general election ballot will be chosen randomly in each county. New Mexico has strengthened its audit law, and California is planning robust risk-limiting audit pilots next year. 13 states that now have voter-verifiable paper records for all voting systems will not conduct post-election hand audits.

    In
    11 states, paperless voting accounts for most or all Election Day ballots. Six states have paperless e-voting statewide: DE, GA, LA, MD, NJ, and SC. In five states, paperless voting counts for a heavy majority of votes: IN, PA, TX, TN, and VA. In KS, we estimate that at least 40% of the vote is paperless.

    In 32 states, voter-marked paper ballots counted by ballot scanners will account for most or all votes. 19 states will use voter-marked paper ballots statewide. In 13 states and DC, optical scan voting will account for the majority of ballots: AK, AZ, CA, CO, FL, IL, HI, KY, MO, NC, WA, WI, and WY.

    33 states plus DC now provide a voter-verifiable paper record (VVPR) for every vote cast. A VVPR may be a paper ballot, or it may be a printout that the voter can view before she casts her ballot on a DRE voting machine.

    40 states have moved toward requiring voter-verified paper records (VVPR), either through legislation or administrative decision.
    7 states will not fully implement their VVPR requirements until some time after the 2010 election: AR, CO, FL, MD, NJ, TN, and VA.

    4 states are now mostly or entirely paperless but have enacted laws to end the use of direct-recording electronic voting machines: MD, NJ, TN, and VA. Maryland's, Tennessee's, and Virginia's statutes require a transition to optically scanned paper ballots, and NJ's statute allows printer retrofits. Maryland's statute requires the transition to begin this year, but the money was not allocated in the budget, Tennessee requires optical scan by 2012, and Virginia has banned the future purchase of any direct-recording electronic machines.

    This year some 32 and states and DC allow military and overseas voters to return their ballots by fax, e-mail, or through a Web portal, though security concerns are starting to be heard. States such as MI, OH, and VA prohibit insecure electronic return of voted ballots. These States instead serve their military and overseas citizens by employing common-sense practices such as electronically transmitting blank ballots to voters and extending the deadline for accepting ballots from abroad.

    The District of Columbia's pilot project for Internet voting for overseas and military voters has been scaled back to allow only electronic delivery of blank ballots to voters (though voted ballots may be e-mailed or faxed). In October 2010, DC's pilot Internet voting system for overseas and military voters was hacked in dramatic fashion by University of Michigan researchers who changed votes on submitted ballots, discovered voters' personal information and who observed users in Iran and China attempting to break into the system. To learn more about Internet voting, please visit Verified Voting Foundation's Internet Voting Information page.



    Nationwide Voting Equipment by Registered Voters
    Equipment Type

    Number of Registered Voters

    Percentage of Registered Voters

    Direct Recording Electronic (DRE) Machines with no Voter-Verifiable Paper Record

    45021727

    24.90%

    DRE Machines with a Voter-Verifiable Paper Record

    14699685

    8.13%

    DRE Machines With and Without Paper Record

    345276

    0.19%

    Voter-marked Paper Ballots/Ballot Scanners and DREs with No Paper Record

    19501550

    10.79%

    Voter-marked Paper Ballots/Ballot Scanners and DREs with Paper Record

    33572723

    18.57%

    Voter-marked Paper Ballots/Ballot Scanners and/or hand count***

    67592032

    37.38%

    Punch Card Voting Systems

    69379

    0.04%

    Total

    180802372


    *Jurisdictions are counties or cities, depending on how States organize their elections.
    ***Includes ballot-marking devices for accessibility. Approximately 1 million voters in 10 states vote in jurisdictions that count all ballots by hand.




    spacer spacer
    The Verifier Map

    spacer

    What equipment do Americans use to cast ballots? See the Verifier Map for detailed information on voting systems used in each state and county.



    See information for:

    Announcements

    March 2, 2012
    Internet voting systems are inherently insecure
    March 2, 2012
    In Theory And Practice, Why Internet-Based Voting Is a Bad Idea
    March 2, 2012
    Hacked DC School Board E-Voting Elects Bender President
    March 1, 2012
    Internet voting systems too insecure, researcher warns
    February 16, 2012
    Internet Voting: Will Democracy or Hackers Win?
    February 14, 2012
    Wireless voting still has a long way to go
    February 14, 2012
    Verifier Voting Calls for Safeguarding of Federal Elections in Cybersecurity Bill
    February 13, 2012
    Stealing Oscar
    February 2, 2012
    Oscars vote vulnerable to cyber attack under new online system, experts warn
    January 9, 2012
    Ballot Secrecy Keeps Voting Technology at Bay
    January 6, 2012
    E-voting machine freezes, misreads votes, U.S. agency says
    December 15, 2011
    Roadmap for the Future of California Elections
    December 5, 2011
    IN: Monroe County Approves New Voting Equipment
    December 2, 2011
    PA: Dismissed Vernango County Elections Board Files Appeal
    November 18, 2011
    Meet the Political Reform Group That's Fueled by Dark Money
    November 10, 2011
    Controversy over voting rules and security
    November 9, 2011
    Democracy deficit at Americans Elect?
    October 28, 2011
    South Jersey voting-machine incident makes waves
    October 24, 2011
    How Voting Equipment Varies in the U.S.
    October 24, 2011
    At Issue: Has Voting Machine Integrity Improved?


    spacer

    RSS Feed - E-Mail This Page - Printer Friendly Version

    VerifiedVoting.org, is a 501(c)(4) lobbying organization. VerifiedVoting.org engages in lobbying activities permitted by IRS Section 501(c)(4). Please visit VerifiedVotingFoundation.org for info about 501(c)(3) educational activities. You can also visit Vote Trust USA, a project of the Verified Voting Foundation.

    Copyright 2012, Verified Voting Foundation, Inc. All rights reserved, although reprint permission granted for nonprofit purposes with attribution to Verified Voting Foundation, Inc.


    PrivacySite Map

    gipoco.com is neither affiliated with the authors of this page nor responsible for its contents. This is a safe-cache copy of the original web site.