spacer
spacer
« Previous Entry | Main | Next Entry »


June 10, 2005
Is Small the New Big for Law Firms?

Seth Godin, listed as an author, entrepreneur and agent of change, recently published his thoughts that Small is the New Big. He argues that while big used to matter, small is now where it's at. [Disclaimer alert: I work for a law firm with 370+ attorneys spread over seven offices] In weaving together a conclusion from empirical evidence, he looks at Fortune 500 as where workers made value from efficiency of scale and contrasts that with the demise of Enron. He postulates that since American Airlines (big) is in trouble but Jet Blue (think small) is doing well, small is all that matters. I guess being shackled with labor and pension costs has nothing to do with it.

He laments that:

Big accounting firms were the place to go to get audited if you were a big company, because a big accounting firm could be trusted. Big law firms were the place to find the right lawyer, because big law firms were a one-stop shop.

And then small happened.

Without giving out too many real statistics, he touts that today, little companies often make more money than big companies. For example, he points out that Craigslist (18 employees) is the fourth most visited site according to some measures (his statistic).

This all is well and good but we part ways on our opinions with his belief that a "small law firm or accounting firm or ad agency is succeeding because they’re good, not because they’re big. So smart small companies are happy to hire them." This doesn't really tell the whole story, does it?

A small firm, with small overhead, often charges less -- and that can lead to success. For some, good enough is, well, good enough. But certainly large firms, especially in today's climate, no longer succeed because of their size and stature. Everyone is price (and value) conscious. That means larger firms also succeed because they're good.

Often, large (and medium-sized firms) bring together a team of attorneys with individual specialties that no small firm can match. I am currently working with a client that in one "small" matter, has issues involving not just patent protection but issues in taxation, bankruptcy, interstate & international commerce, regulatory and criminal law, all rolled into one. Fortunately, we're able to put together the right mix of attorneys to work through the problems and come up with a success overall.

As with his Airline example above, on an average day, American Airlines will fly more than 2,600 flights. Meanwhile, Jet Blue has 68 aircraft that connect 32 cities (about 290 flights a day). Let's hope that we don't all need to rely on just Jet Blue or we'll be using a lot of bus service.

Don't get me wrong, I love small. I miss my small, corner grocery store every week whenever I'm forced to go to the big-boxes that have now forced everyone else out of the area. I love the family bicycle shop and the tiny corner coffee shop. But what really matters is personal attention. What we like to call Midwestern values or some sort of hometown attitude. People want to feel appreciated and to feel that their matter is important. To be known by name and to be get attention. That's why our firm doesn't feel "large" -- we take time to notice people and to care about what matters to them.

This is something every large(r) firm needs to learn.

Posted by Stephen at June 10, 2005 01:00 PM
Keywords:
  • law+firms




  • Send This Article Email this entry to:


    Your email address:


    Message (optional):


    spacer
    Stephen & Karlyn

    Contact Us: spacer


    spacer

    Syndicate this site: spacer
    RSS 1.0 • RSS 2.0 • Atom

    Enter your Email


    Powered by FeedBlitz


    spacer
  • D.C. Circuit: Merck Can't Pull the Rug Out From Under Para IV Listers
  • The Importance of Being Earnest (and Getting Things in Writing)
  • Biotech Drugs: How to Spend $1.2 Billion
  • Upcoming Conference on Biotech Patents
  • Daily Dose of IP
  • New Found Property Doesn't Make Known Material Novel
  • Poll: Your Top Legal Blog
  • Friday Editorial: What Do the Elections Mean to Pharma?
  • Relieving the Duty to Pay Royalties-- Go Medical v. Inmed Corp.
  • Is Dr. Reddy's Playing It Smart? Or Is It Glaxo?


  • spacer
    November 2006
    Sun Mon Tue Wed Thu Fri Sat
          1 2 3 4
    5 6 7 8 9 10 11
    12 13 14 15 16 17 18
    19 20 21 22 23 24 25
    26 27 28 29 30    




    spacer
  • Adam Smith, Esq.
  • Anything Under the Sun
  • Bag and Baggage
  • Blawg Review
  • business2blog
  • California Biotech Law Blog
  • DennisKennedy.com
  • Fire of Genius
  • How Appealing
  • In The Pipeline
  • IP Counsel Blog
  • IPEG
  • ipFrontline
  • IP::JUR.com
  • IPKat
  • IP Law Daily
  • IP Litigation Law Blog
  • IP Newsflash
  • I/P Updates
  • inter alia
  • LawPundit
  • Legal Ethics Blog
  • May It Please The Court
  • Nipper's Invent Blog
  • Notes From the Legal Underground
  • the [non]billable hour
  • Orange Book Blog
  • Patent Infringement Updates
  • Patent Prospector
  • Patently-Obvious
  • PHOSITA: an IP blawg
  • Pierce Law IP News Blog
  • Promote the Progress
  • Tech Law Advisor
  • Two-Seventy-One Patent Blog
  • The Wired GC


  • spacer
  • Car Talk
  • Common Scold
  • Gizmodo
  • go fug yourself
  • Infectious Greed
  • Jalopnik
  • Life Hacker
  • patently silly
  • Starbucks Gossip
  • VentureBlog
  • Blogarama
  • BlogStreet
  • Technorati Profile
  • My Ecosystem Details


  • gipoco.com is neither affiliated with the authors of this page nor responsible for its contents. This is a safe-cache copy of the original web site.