Are Your Viewers Looking or Seeing?

by Alyson Stanfield on March 22, 2012

The job of the artist isn’t to give people something to look at. God knows we have enough to look at.

The job of the artist is to get people to see. – Richard Tuttle

Deep Thought Thursday

This week’s deep thought is courtesy of artist Richard Tuttle, whom I heard speak at the Denver Art Museum last night.

What’s the difference between looking and seeing?

Is it your job to get people to see?

How do you do that job?

 

Tagged as: communication

{ 12 comments… read them below or add one }

spacer Janice Tanton March 22, 2012 at 6:35 am

I feel it is very important to be clear in your statement as an artist, but also to have a statement for each work that you create. This takes the “look” into a “see” and draws the audience closer to your work, context and intent. There will always be the first “look” which is like an infatuation stage – seeing something you are attracted to, enough to take a second look and “see” what is really there. That’s where you come to the love of it all. spacer

Not only does having a statement for each piece help to draw your audience closer, but it also will draw you closer to your work.

Reply

spacer Laura Higgins March 22, 2012 at 6:54 am

I do think my job is to get people to “see.” Many of my pieces are paintings of things you may observe every day but I try to draw closer attention to them either through close cropping in composition, light effects or by reinterpreting them through borrowed symbolism like gold embellishments in my Sacred Food Series. Like Janice Tanton, when I display my work I write labels for each piece that share more about their inspiration or meaning and I find that my viewers love having that “way into” the pieces.

Reply

spacer Pam Regan March 22, 2012 at 7:24 am

Being a new gallerist, I’ve experienced many visitors who are looking. I must say that with our current Lisa Call exhibit, people are really seeing. Your comment helps me explain the difference that we are experiencing at the gallery. It is amazing, and I now know that I need to attract visitors who see rather than look. I also agree with Janice, in that Lisa Call’s statements about each body of work help visitors see the depth of her works.

Reply

spacer Bill lester March 22, 2012 at 7:27 am

To much of your information about any of your work could take the viewer away from finding their own interpretation of the work, thereby giving them a chance to reject you and the piece. Keep the mystery there and allow them to find their answers.

Reply

spacer Vicki Ross March 22, 2012 at 10:32 am

The 1 million dollar question, Alyson. I feel I’ve come close a couple of times lately when a commission brought tears to the client’s eyes.

Reply

spacer Josh McCallister March 22, 2012 at 10:38 am

This is the main reason I went into art education – to teach people how to see. I don’t know if it’s always the artist’s job, though I am certainly against pretentious notions from elitists : people who don’t already understand are a lost cause.
My opinion is that art classes should include good art history, which will help students to appreciate, or see new work.
Last thing: as a portrait artist, making a piece to consider, rather than a snapshot to forget, that’s my business.

Reply

spacer Josh McCallister March 22, 2012 at 2:22 pm

I left a bad link to my site: joshmacart.com.

Reply

spacer swag March 22, 2012 at 3:43 pm

seeing art the way the artist meant it to be interprated is always usefull

Reply

spacer Jamie March 23, 2012 at 12:06 pm

What a great quote! It reminds of one of my favs from Ansel Adams:
“A great photograph is one that fully expresses what one feels, in the deepest sense, about what is being photographed.”

Reply

spacer Jill Rosoff March 23, 2012 at 3:25 pm

This idea is so important. I talk to my watercolor students about this, about when they are in the process of deciding what to paint, that they often look at something, but to take the time to really see what is there. When they do this, and bring it back to a workshop, its exhilarating to hear things like, “do you know how many greens there are in a tree?” My job in a painting is to express my ideas about what I see, and what my imagination adds to it, when then hopefully affects the viewers of the artwork. When it does affect them, and I see a change in their face, or posture, or even if they have just stopped to consider the work, to see it, it’s magic, unspoken communication.

Reply

spacer victoria pendragon March 24, 2012 at 4:58 am

How do I do that job? By choosing to paint that which others do not see when they look.

Everything in my art is about the energy that lies behind things. My ‘self’ is a kind of a seer; I’ve been that since I was a kid. So I choose to paint how the energy of – a person or people or a pose – feels to me in terms of metaphorical images and color, taking the viewer right into an experience where, because they cannot immediately identify what they are looking at, they are forced to ‘see.’

Those that don’t, won’t or can’t see deeply usually don’t even ‘see’ the art to begin with and will walk right by. Those who are drawn into the experience by the promise and the mystery become engaged in it and often spend a great deal of time ‘looking’ into the work…seeing what is there for them.

I do pen descriptions for most of my work both to assist those who are learning to see and to open doors they might have missed. That was recommended to my by a gallery owner who carries my work and I’ve found that just the process of it has helped me to be able to talk with what I hope is greater clarity about my work.

(Love that quote!)

Reply

spacer Carolyn March 26, 2012 at 6:29 am

See. But even more, the viewer should experience. Feel. And walk away fuller. (Hopefully, with the painting purchased and tucked under their arm.)

Reply

Cancel reply

Leave a Comment

Previous post: 4 Reasons to Cherish Unsubscribes

Next post: Celebrating My 10 Year Anniversary

This blog is licensed under Creative Commons. Please read the copyright policies.
gipoco.com is neither affiliated with the authors of this page nor responsible for its contents. This is a safe-cache copy of the original web site.